God of the Gaps (well then, how did...")

Thats what you freaks do with AGW
AGW Iis a solid theory and enjoys overwhelming consensus...don't compare it to believing in zombie Kings and sky daddies, you embarrass yourself to do so.

Haha. You're embarrassing yourself with the AGW since AGW is supposed to kill animals. For example, anthrax kills animals. That's observable, testable and falsifiable. AGW doesn't even hurt a fly let alone kill a dinosaur. Plants thrive in that environment and that's why it doesn't kill animals. .
 
Thats what you freaks do with AGW
AGW Iis a solid theory and enjoys overwhelming consensus...don't compare it to believing in zombie Kings and sky daddies, you embarrass yourself to do so.

Haha. You're embarrassing yourself with the AGW since AGW is supposed to kill animals. For example, anthrax kills animals. That's observable, testable and falsifiable. AGW doesn't even hurt a fly let alone kill a dinosaur. Plants thrive in that environment and that's why it doesn't kill animals. .

Might wanna rethink that thought there dude. Coral is a living organism, and because they can only survive in a very narrow temperature band, if it gets too hot, they will die off, and all the other animals that depend on the coral reef will also die.

Corals Are Dying on the Great Barrier Reef

Diver surveys based off Cape York, Australia's northeastern tip, found up to 50 percent mortality in the reef from coral bleaching. Death among the organisms that build the reef's structure is most likely linked to rising temperatures in the ocean, the government announced.


"The corals in the remote far north of the reef experienced extremely hot and still conditions this summer, and were effectively bathed in warm water for months, creating heat stress that they could no longer cope with," Russell Reichelt, the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, said in a statement.


Bleaching occurs when warm ocean water stresses corals to the point that they expel the tiny algae, known as zooxanthellae, that normally live inside their tissues. The algae provide the corals with most of their food, as well as their color. If the heat stress is lessened soon enough, the coral can recover. If not the, organisms will die.


What's happening in Australia is part of a global trend. Over the last year, about 12 percent of the world's reefs have bleached, due to El Niño and climate change. Scientists have predicted that nearly half of these reefs (more than 4,600 square miles or 12,000 square kilometers, or more than five percent of reefs) could disappear forever. That warming trend is expected to continue through the year, leading to what may be the longest global coral bleaching event in history.
 
It just goes to show you're not RIGHTEOUS. As I said, plain as day, "God, the supernatural (Genesis) and the Bible were the standard" before the 1850s. That is part of creation science and not religion. I will take back the "lies.. at Tower of Babel." That belongs in religion.

The rest of your post is silly. It goes to show that you do not understand science at all. Your OP shows that. Your post shows that. Your attitude and aptitude shows that.
There is still no god/dog in evidence.
This is the Science section
You're TROLLING and OFF topic..
`
 
Thats what you freaks do with AGW
AGW Iis a solid theory and enjoys overwhelming consensus...don't compare it to believing in zombie Kings and sky daddies, you embarrass yourself to do so.

Haha. You're embarrassing yourself with the AGW since AGW is supposed to kill animals. For example, anthrax kills animals. That's observable, testable and falsifiable. AGW doesn't even hurt a fly let alone kill a dinosaur. Plants thrive in that environment and that's why it doesn't kill animals. .

Might wanna rethink that thought there dude. Coral is a living organism, and because they can only survive in a very narrow temperature band, if it gets too hot, they will die off, and all the other animals that depend on the coral reef will also die.

Corals Are Dying on the Great Barrier Reef

Diver surveys based off Cape York, Australia's northeastern tip, found up to 50 percent mortality in the reef from coral bleaching. Death among the organisms that build the reef's structure is most likely linked to rising temperatures in the ocean, the government announced.


"The corals in the remote far north of the reef experienced extremely hot and still conditions this summer, and were effectively bathed in warm water for months, creating heat stress that they could no longer cope with," Russell Reichelt, the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, said in a statement.


Bleaching occurs when warm ocean water stresses corals to the point that they expel the tiny algae, known as zooxanthellae, that normally live inside their tissues. The algae provide the corals with most of their food, as well as their color. If the heat stress is lessened soon enough, the coral can recover. If not the, organisms will die.


What's happening in Australia is part of a global trend. Over the last year, about 12 percent of the world's reefs have bleached, due to El Niño and climate change. Scientists have predicted that nearly half of these reefs (more than 4,600 square miles or 12,000 square kilometers, or more than five percent of reefs) could disappear forever. That warming trend is expected to continue through the year, leading to what may be the longest global coral bleaching event in history.

I agree that if it gets too hot then the corals die off as in the article, but what if it's just change to the weather or due to the warm current? Would you admit that it wasn't caused by AGW? Because those corals have recovered the following year.
 
Thats what you freaks do with AGW
AGW Iis a solid theory and enjoys overwhelming consensus...don't compare it to believing in zombie Kings and sky daddies, you embarrass yourself to do so.

Haha. You're embarrassing yourself with the AGW since AGW is supposed to kill animals. For example, anthrax kills animals. That's observable, testable and falsifiable. AGW doesn't even hurt a fly let alone kill a dinosaur. Plants thrive in that environment and that's why it doesn't kill animals. .

Might wanna rethink that thought there dude. Coral is a living organism, and because they can only survive in a very narrow temperature band, if it gets too hot, they will die off, and all the other animals that depend on the coral reef will also die.

Corals Are Dying on the Great Barrier Reef

Diver surveys based off Cape York, Australia's northeastern tip, found up to 50 percent mortality in the reef from coral bleaching. Death among the organisms that build the reef's structure is most likely linked to rising temperatures in the ocean, the government announced.


"The corals in the remote far north of the reef experienced extremely hot and still conditions this summer, and were effectively bathed in warm water for months, creating heat stress that they could no longer cope with," Russell Reichelt, the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, said in a statement.


Bleaching occurs when warm ocean water stresses corals to the point that they expel the tiny algae, known as zooxanthellae, that normally live inside their tissues. The algae provide the corals with most of their food, as well as their color. If the heat stress is lessened soon enough, the coral can recover. If not the, organisms will die.


What's happening in Australia is part of a global trend. Over the last year, about 12 percent of the world's reefs have bleached, due to El Niño and climate change. Scientists have predicted that nearly half of these reefs (more than 4,600 square miles or 12,000 square kilometers, or more than five percent of reefs) could disappear forever. That warming trend is expected to continue through the year, leading to what may be the longest global coral bleaching event in history.

I agree that if it gets too hot then the corals die off as in the article, but what if it's just change to the weather or due to the warm current? Would you admit that it wasn't caused by AGW? Because those corals have recovered the following year.

No, those corals haven't recovered. 12 percent of the world's coral reefs were bleached last year. And, bleaching means they die and don't recover, which results in the animals that depend on the coral will either die or move to another place.
 
Thats what you freaks do with AGW
AGW Iis a solid theory and enjoys overwhelming consensus...don't compare it to believing in zombie Kings and sky daddies, you embarrass yourself to do so.

Haha. You're embarrassing yourself with the AGW since AGW is supposed to kill animals. For example, anthrax kills animals. That's observable, testable and falsifiable. AGW doesn't even hurt a fly let alone kill a dinosaur. Plants thrive in that environment and that's why it doesn't kill animals. .

Might wanna rethink that thought there dude. Coral is a living organism, and because they can only survive in a very narrow temperature band, if it gets too hot, they will die off, and all the other animals that depend on the coral reef will also die.

Corals Are Dying on the Great Barrier Reef

Diver surveys based off Cape York, Australia's northeastern tip, found up to 50 percent mortality in the reef from coral bleaching. Death among the organisms that build the reef's structure is most likely linked to rising temperatures in the ocean, the government announced.


"The corals in the remote far north of the reef experienced extremely hot and still conditions this summer, and were effectively bathed in warm water for months, creating heat stress that they could no longer cope with," Russell Reichelt, the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, said in a statement.


Bleaching occurs when warm ocean water stresses corals to the point that they expel the tiny algae, known as zooxanthellae, that normally live inside their tissues. The algae provide the corals with most of their food, as well as their color. If the heat stress is lessened soon enough, the coral can recover. If not the, organisms will die.


What's happening in Australia is part of a global trend. Over the last year, about 12 percent of the world's reefs have bleached, due to El Niño and climate change. Scientists have predicted that nearly half of these reefs (more than 4,600 square miles or 12,000 square kilometers, or more than five percent of reefs) could disappear forever. That warming trend is expected to continue through the year, leading to what may be the longest global coral bleaching event in history.

I agree that if it gets too hot then the corals die off as in the article, but what if it's just change to the weather or due to the warm current? Would you admit that it wasn't caused by AGW? Because those corals have recovered the following year.

No, those corals haven't recovered. 12 percent of the world's coral reefs were bleached last year. And, bleaching means they die and don't recover, which results in the animals that depend on the coral will either die or move to another place.
No it doesnt. Just because they bleach doesnt mean they die.
Look at the indian ocean. In the late 90s, 80 percent got bleached and around 25 percent died.
 
AGW Iis a solid theory and enjoys overwhelming consensus...don't compare it to believing in zombie Kings and sky daddies, you embarrass yourself to do so.

Haha. You're embarrassing yourself with the AGW since AGW is supposed to kill animals. For example, anthrax kills animals. That's observable, testable and falsifiable. AGW doesn't even hurt a fly let alone kill a dinosaur. Plants thrive in that environment and that's why it doesn't kill animals. .

Might wanna rethink that thought there dude. Coral is a living organism, and because they can only survive in a very narrow temperature band, if it gets too hot, they will die off, and all the other animals that depend on the coral reef will also die.

Corals Are Dying on the Great Barrier Reef

Diver surveys based off Cape York, Australia's northeastern tip, found up to 50 percent mortality in the reef from coral bleaching. Death among the organisms that build the reef's structure is most likely linked to rising temperatures in the ocean, the government announced.


"The corals in the remote far north of the reef experienced extremely hot and still conditions this summer, and were effectively bathed in warm water for months, creating heat stress that they could no longer cope with," Russell Reichelt, the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, said in a statement.


Bleaching occurs when warm ocean water stresses corals to the point that they expel the tiny algae, known as zooxanthellae, that normally live inside their tissues. The algae provide the corals with most of their food, as well as their color. If the heat stress is lessened soon enough, the coral can recover. If not the, organisms will die.


What's happening in Australia is part of a global trend. Over the last year, about 12 percent of the world's reefs have bleached, due to El Niño and climate change. Scientists have predicted that nearly half of these reefs (more than 4,600 square miles or 12,000 square kilometers, or more than five percent of reefs) could disappear forever. That warming trend is expected to continue through the year, leading to what may be the longest global coral bleaching event in history.

I agree that if it gets too hot then the corals die off as in the article, but what if it's just change to the weather or due to the warm current? Would you admit that it wasn't caused by AGW? Because those corals have recovered the following year.

No, those corals haven't recovered. 12 percent of the world's coral reefs were bleached last year. And, bleaching means they die and don't recover, which results in the animals that depend on the coral will either die or move to another place.
No it doesnt. Just because they bleach doesnt mean they die.
Look at the indian ocean. In the late 90s, 80 percent got bleached and around 25 percent died.

I call BS. Provide a link that shows the Indian Ocean had 80 percent of their coral reefs bleached.
 
Haha. You're embarrassing yourself with the AGW since AGW is supposed to kill animals. For example, anthrax kills animals. That's observable, testable and falsifiable. AGW doesn't even hurt a fly let alone kill a dinosaur. Plants thrive in that environment and that's why it doesn't kill animals. .

Might wanna rethink that thought there dude. Coral is a living organism, and because they can only survive in a very narrow temperature band, if it gets too hot, they will die off, and all the other animals that depend on the coral reef will also die.

Corals Are Dying on the Great Barrier Reef

Diver surveys based off Cape York, Australia's northeastern tip, found up to 50 percent mortality in the reef from coral bleaching. Death among the organisms that build the reef's structure is most likely linked to rising temperatures in the ocean, the government announced.


"The corals in the remote far north of the reef experienced extremely hot and still conditions this summer, and were effectively bathed in warm water for months, creating heat stress that they could no longer cope with," Russell Reichelt, the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, said in a statement.


Bleaching occurs when warm ocean water stresses corals to the point that they expel the tiny algae, known as zooxanthellae, that normally live inside their tissues. The algae provide the corals with most of their food, as well as their color. If the heat stress is lessened soon enough, the coral can recover. If not the, organisms will die.


What's happening in Australia is part of a global trend. Over the last year, about 12 percent of the world's reefs have bleached, due to El Niño and climate change. Scientists have predicted that nearly half of these reefs (more than 4,600 square miles or 12,000 square kilometers, or more than five percent of reefs) could disappear forever. That warming trend is expected to continue through the year, leading to what may be the longest global coral bleaching event in history.

I agree that if it gets too hot then the corals die off as in the article, but what if it's just change to the weather or due to the warm current? Would you admit that it wasn't caused by AGW? Because those corals have recovered the following year.

No, those corals haven't recovered. 12 percent of the world's coral reefs were bleached last year. And, bleaching means they die and don't recover, which results in the animals that depend on the coral will either die or move to another place.
No it doesnt. Just because they bleach doesnt mean they die.
Look at the indian ocean. In the late 90s, 80 percent got bleached and around 25 percent died.

I call BS. Provide a link that shows the Indian Ocean had 80 percent of their coral reefs bleached.
Corals and Coral Reefs
 
Might wanna rethink that thought there dude. Coral is a living organism, and because they can only survive in a very narrow temperature band, if it gets too hot, they will die off, and all the other animals that depend on the coral reef will also die.

Corals Are Dying on the Great Barrier Reef

Diver surveys based off Cape York, Australia's northeastern tip, found up to 50 percent mortality in the reef from coral bleaching. Death among the organisms that build the reef's structure is most likely linked to rising temperatures in the ocean, the government announced.


"The corals in the remote far north of the reef experienced extremely hot and still conditions this summer, and were effectively bathed in warm water for months, creating heat stress that they could no longer cope with," Russell Reichelt, the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, said in a statement.


Bleaching occurs when warm ocean water stresses corals to the point that they expel the tiny algae, known as zooxanthellae, that normally live inside their tissues. The algae provide the corals with most of their food, as well as their color. If the heat stress is lessened soon enough, the coral can recover. If not the, organisms will die.


What's happening in Australia is part of a global trend. Over the last year, about 12 percent of the world's reefs have bleached, due to El Niño and climate change. Scientists have predicted that nearly half of these reefs (more than 4,600 square miles or 12,000 square kilometers, or more than five percent of reefs) could disappear forever. That warming trend is expected to continue through the year, leading to what may be the longest global coral bleaching event in history.

I agree that if it gets too hot then the corals die off as in the article, but what if it's just change to the weather or due to the warm current? Would you admit that it wasn't caused by AGW? Because those corals have recovered the following year.

No, those corals haven't recovered. 12 percent of the world's coral reefs were bleached last year. And, bleaching means they die and don't recover, which results in the animals that depend on the coral will either die or move to another place.
No it doesnt. Just because they bleach doesnt mean they die.
Look at the indian ocean. In the late 90s, 80 percent got bleached and around 25 percent died.

I call BS. Provide a link that shows the Indian Ocean had 80 percent of their coral reefs bleached.
Corals and Coral Reefs

Current conditions are much worse than what they were in the 80's, and the water around the reefs is heating up for longer periods of time now. And, yes, even your link says that coral reefs are dying from both bleaching and ocean acidification, which dissolves the calcium skeletons of the corals, and they are currently on the decline. Even said that one reef in Hawaii is currently being dissolved.
 
AGW Iis a solid theory and enjoys overwhelming consensus...don't compare it to believing in zombie Kings and sky daddies, you embarrass yourself to do so.

Haha. You're embarrassing yourself with the AGW since AGW is supposed to kill animals. For example, anthrax kills animals. That's observable, testable and falsifiable. AGW doesn't even hurt a fly let alone kill a dinosaur. Plants thrive in that environment and that's why it doesn't kill animals. .

Might wanna rethink that thought there dude. Coral is a living organism, and because they can only survive in a very narrow temperature band, if it gets too hot, they will die off, and all the other animals that depend on the coral reef will also die.

Corals Are Dying on the Great Barrier Reef

Diver surveys based off Cape York, Australia's northeastern tip, found up to 50 percent mortality in the reef from coral bleaching. Death among the organisms that build the reef's structure is most likely linked to rising temperatures in the ocean, the government announced.


"The corals in the remote far north of the reef experienced extremely hot and still conditions this summer, and were effectively bathed in warm water for months, creating heat stress that they could no longer cope with," Russell Reichelt, the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, said in a statement.


Bleaching occurs when warm ocean water stresses corals to the point that they expel the tiny algae, known as zooxanthellae, that normally live inside their tissues. The algae provide the corals with most of their food, as well as their color. If the heat stress is lessened soon enough, the coral can recover. If not the, organisms will die.


What's happening in Australia is part of a global trend. Over the last year, about 12 percent of the world's reefs have bleached, due to El Niño and climate change. Scientists have predicted that nearly half of these reefs (more than 4,600 square miles or 12,000 square kilometers, or more than five percent of reefs) could disappear forever. That warming trend is expected to continue through the year, leading to what may be the longest global coral bleaching event in history.

I agree that if it gets too hot then the corals die off as in the article, but what if it's just change to the weather or due to the warm current? Would you admit that it wasn't caused by AGW? Because those corals have recovered the following year.

No, those corals haven't recovered. 12 percent of the world's coral reefs were bleached last year. And, bleaching means they die and don't recover, which results in the animals that depend on the coral will either die or move to another place.
No it doesnt. Just because they bleach doesnt mean they die.
Look at the indian ocean. In the late 90s, 80 percent got bleached and around 25 percent died.
And as the oceans get warmer and more acidic, more coral will bleach, and more coral will die.
 
I agree that if it gets too hot then the corals die off as in the article, but what if it's just change to the weather or due to the warm current? Would you admit that it wasn't caused by AGW? Because those corals have recovered the following year.

No, those corals haven't recovered. 12 percent of the world's coral reefs were bleached last year. And, bleaching means they die and don't recover, which results in the animals that depend on the coral will either die or move to another place.
No it doesnt. Just because they bleach doesnt mean they die.
Look at the indian ocean. In the late 90s, 80 percent got bleached and around 25 percent died.

I call BS. Provide a link that shows the Indian Ocean had 80 percent of their coral reefs bleached.
Corals and Coral Reefs

Current conditions are much worse than what they were in the 80's, and the water around the reefs is heating up for longer periods of time now. And, yes, even your link says that coral reefs are dying from both bleaching and ocean acidification, which dissolves the calcium skeletons of the corals, and they are currently on the decline. Even said that one reef in Hawaii is currently being dissolved.
It was the late 90s.
And yes, some corals die from bleaching. However, it isnt automatic, like you claimed.
 
Atheists frequently use the evolution of the gaps fallacy, where they blindly insert evolution as an explanation for things we don't understand. I'm not just talking biology, either; it's oozed it's way into cosmology, and elsewhere.

Deep Thinker: "How did the universe get so orderly and comprehensible, exactly as we'd expect it to be if it were the product of design?"

Atheist: "Evolution done it!"

It's merely filling a gap in ignorance with a blind plea to the mystical "evolution." It's embarrassing stuff, especially when the same people using the evolution of the gaps fallacy moan about the God of the gaps fallacy.
 
Atheists frequently use the evolution of the gaps fallacy, where they blindly insert evolution as an explanation for things we don't understand. I'm not just talking biology, either; it's oozed it's way into cosmology, and elsewhere.

Deep Thinker: "How did the universe get so orderly and comprehensible, exactly as we'd expect it to be if it were the product of design?"

Atheist: "Evolution done it!"

It's merely filling a gap in ignorance with a blind plea to the mystical "evolution." It's embarrassing stuff, especially when the same people using the evolution of the gaps fallacy moan about the God of the gaps fallacy.
1. Evolution has Evidence. Lots.
God/s have none.

2. The universe is NOT "so orderly and comprehensible.."
it's a mess.
Galaxies colliding, Stars exploding, causing unimaginable destruction.
Billions of planets at a time losing life if they have any.

3. You're mixing and matching the Universe with Evolution pilgrim.
`
 
Last edited:
Deep Thinker: "How did the universe get so orderly and comprehensible, exactly as we'd expect it to be if it were the product of design?"
Well this is an embarrassingly stupid and circular bit of nonsense. What would a "not designed" universe look like? Who gives a shit about your impressions about what looks designed in what does not? Those are scientific ideas; those are your gut feelings.
 
Atheists frequently use the evolution of the gaps fallacy, where they blindly insert evolution as an explanation for things we don't understand. I'm not just talking biology, either; it's oozed it's way into cosmology, and elsewhere.

Deep Thinker: "How did the universe get so orderly and comprehensible, exactly as we'd expect it to be if it were the product of design?"

Atheist: "Evolution done it!"

It's merely filling a gap in ignorance with a blind plea to the mystical "evolution." It's embarrassing stuff, especially when the same people using the evolution of the gaps fallacy moan about the God of the gaps fallacy.
1. Evolution has Evidence. Lots.
God/s have none.

2. The universe is NOT "so orderly and comprehensible.."
it's a mess.
Galaxies colliding, Stars exploding, causing unimaginable destruction.
Billions of planets at a time losing life if they have any.

3. You're mixing and matching the Universe with Evolution pilgrim.
`

This post is so bad that to respond to it with anything other than a single line of condensation and Muttley laughing would be giving it far more respect than it deserves.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Atheists frequently use the evolution of the gaps fallacy, where they blindly insert evolution as an explanation for things we don't understand
name one specific example. Not the idiotic philosophical example where you assumed the things you must argue.

I'm not going to hold you by the hand and walk you through it, as I'm not the kind of person who has that kind of free time, Mr. 20,000 Messages. Instead, I'll simply give you a nudge in the right direction:

largepreview.png


That's Harvard. Notice how they shoehorn the word "evolution" onto every aspect of existence? This is because evolution is a magical word that can be used to pseudo-explain anything and everything, without bothering any pesky details or evidence. It's used in exactly the same manner the ultra-religious use the term God. The difference is, the ultra-religious don't try to pass their claims off of as science. We can't say the same for the "evolution done it" dummies.
 
I'm not going to hold you by the hand and walk you through it
Which is not what giving "one example" would be. This is you just prancing and preening,honestly thinking you have somehow covered for the fact that you are full of shit. It didn't work. You are, indeed, full of shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top