When did evilutionists create beneficial mutations? Cell mutations can be caused by errors in DNA replication. That would suggest the gods crested a poor design subject to error.
Your examples aren't really beneficial mutation changes, but changes that were already present in the living organism.
If one analyzes these claimed beneficial mutations, then it doesn't add information or some beneficial trait such as a fish growing legs and feet so it can walk on land. Mutations only execute changes that were already
pre-existing. When we ask for this type of evidence, the atheist scientists need millions or billions of years to do it. However, it can't be done because one would have to add new information to the organism.
The examples are clearly beneficial mutations.
If one analyzes the beneficial mutations, they are beneficial to fitness for survival.
You make the mistake typical among the hyper-religious / science illiterate. A fish growing legs is not beneficial to a fish well adapted to its environment.
When this is presented to the hyper-religious / science illiterate, they typically rattle on with meaningless nonsense about fish growing legs or snakes talking to humans.
You could not explain in your own words how each of these examples were beneficial mutations. I had to read your link and found they were not actual beneficial mutations, but just you claiming they were.
Moreover, I found your mutations only execute changes that were already pre-existing in the cells. Your second claim did not actually execute something different from that which was present in the cell. For example, if a group a cells were to help a fish develop his side fins then a mutation would affect the fins. They may be larger than the previous version. The fin cells would produce variations of fins, but not produce a leg and feet there as the atheist evolutionists claim. I mean we know what these cells can do and they just solely execute what the fin cells are supposed to do. Even with long time, they won't become cells that will grow legs and feet. Why? They're not that type of cells. The cells do not contain the information for legs and feet. Had you read and understood your link so you could explain it to me, then you would have realized these mutations do not get additional information so the cells can become legs and feet.
Thus, I found that another of your claims was not true using your own link
.
You could not explain how the beneficial mutations were not, in fact, beneficial mutations so you were left to make unfounded claims.
You made some unfounded claim about cells being preexisting yet that is simply another of your “... because I say”, claims. That is a standard tactic of the hyper-religious / non-scientific types.
To cure disease, researchers are starting to scour the genomes of the abnormally healthy. In 2009, researchers at the Broad Institute in Boston, led by geneticist David Altshuler, started recruiting elderly, overweight individuals who, by all accounts, ought to have type 2 diabetes but didn’t...
www.pnas.org
When beneficial mutations are rare, they accumulate by a series of selective sweeps. But when they are common, many beneficial mutations will occur before any can fix, so there will be many different mutant lineages in the population concurrently. ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Researchers discovered that bacteria can evolve much more efficiently than once thought, which might help develop better ways to treat nasty infections.
news.utexas.edu
Soooo.... here we have additional data from leading science organizations and teaching / research universities refuting your unsourced, “... because I say so” claims. I would have thought you could offer some competing testing and research data from one of your ID’iot creation ministries. However, we both know that ID’iot creation ministries do no research.
Once again we’re left to to the hyper-religious denying science and deny the research data in attempts to protect their sacred cows.
Can you just briefly explain your links and how they support your argument of beneficial mutation? I'm not going to read again to find something you didn't realize or missed for which I use to win the argument.
I would suggest that read the links, especially the one that is directed to the high school student. That link explains beneficial mutations to those with a limited science vocabulary.
I’ve noticed a pattern of behavior where, when you are presented with the science data, you offer some variation of the “... because I say so” argument, utterly unsupported, and declare yourself the “winner”.
Can you offer some lab data prepared by one of your creation ministries which has performed testing and published works that refutes the existence of beneficial mutations?
For your use and information, here is a lengthy discussion that describes beneficial mutations.
Here are the references that were used in compiling the above document.
Futuyma, Douglas J. (1997).
Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
Ridley, Mark. (2003).
Evolution. Boston: Blackwell Scientific.
Hartl, Daniel L. & Andrew G. Clark. (1997).
Principles of Population Genetics. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
Crow, James F. & Motoo Kimura. (1970).
Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Edina, Minn.: Burgess Publishing Company.
Graur, Dan & Wen-Hsiung Li. (2000).
Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
Lewontin, Richard C. (1974).
The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Gillespie, John H. (1997).
The Causes of Molecular Evolution. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Golding, Brian, ed. (1994).
Non-Neutral Evolution. Boston: Chapman and Hall.
Kimura, Motoo. (1983).
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Endler, John A. (1986).
Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.
Eldredge, Niles. (1989).
Macroevolutionary Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cowen, Richard. (2004).
History of Life. Boston: Blackwell Scientific.
Dawkins, Richard. (1987).
The Blind Watchmaker. New York: W.W. Norton.
Kitcher, Philip. (1982).
Abusing Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Wilson, Edward O. (1992).
The Diversity of Life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Belknap.
Darwin, Charles. (1859).
On the Origin of Species.
Darwin, Charles. (1871).
The Descent of Man.
Haldane, J.B.S. (1932).
The Causes of Evolution. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press (reprinted 1990).
Simpson, George G. (1944).
Tempo and Mode in Evolution. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Mayr, Ernst E. (1982).
The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Belknap.
Provine, William B. (2001).
The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
.
