Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See?Surely not the genocidal prick, Yahweh? If so, let's check that prick's morals.
I guess if one believes God created evil this is the logical conclusion.Jehovah sounds quote satanic.
He regretted creating us in his incompetent way, but not for using genocide.
That shows his satanic nature. He does not have the good moral sense to repent for his sins and crimes against humanity.
Regards
DL
Yetzer means to form, as in to perfect.Wrong. Mankind has a choice between doing good and not doing good. So free will still exists. God did not create evil.According to @rylah’s logic had God not created evil then the Holocaust would have never have happened.
Wow you really scratching the bottom!
Let me help you out.
Had not G-d created evil inclination,
man wouldn't have the freedom to choose between good and evil.
And what did G-d call this 'not doing good?
The tree of good and...?
Ra means corrupted.
Ding means Ignore.
Not good.Wrong. Mankind has a choice between doing good and not doing good. So free will still exists. God did not create evil.According to @rylah’s logic had God not created evil then the Holocaust would have never have happened.
Wow you really scratching the bottom!
Let me help you out.
Had not G-d created evil inclination,
man wouldn't have the freedom to choose between good and evil.
And what did G-d call this 'not doing good?
The tree of good and...?
unless you want to blame God for creating evil. Is that what you want to do?
And yet, that's exactly what you suggested regarding the flood.See?Surely not the genocidal prick, Yahweh? If so, let's check that prick's morals.
Way to go rylah
Neither, nor.And you wonder why so many Jews are atheist?
And people like the OP calls the G-d of Abraham a genocidal prick?
And yet, that's exactly what you suggested regarding the flood.See?Surely not the genocidal prick, Yahweh? If so, let's check that prick's morals.
Way to go rylah
He's wrong, and you're wrong - I'm not the one to blame for that.
Nice try - but you're both responsible for your own thoughts and deeds.
I can hear it now. Your rabbi’s taught that I created evil. Oy vey.
Christians are confused.Why does God allow suffering and evil? Christians can answer:
1) It is good for God to give people freedom, but some people misuse their freedom and reject Jesus' call for forgiveness, kindness, and human dignity.
2) God also gives angels freedom. Some angels are fallen (like Satan) and cause suffering - for example bringing about natural disasters.
Satan and the Corruption of Nature: Seven Arguments – ReKnew
-
Book Review: Satan and the Problem of Evil: Constructing a Trinitarian Warfare Theodicy - Gregory A. Boyd
Satan has suffered defeats, but he is still powerful:
Ephesians 6:12 - For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
3) Suffering can lead to good. I'm sure we can all think of times when suffering has led to personal growth. What would life be without challenges? Should we spend our lives lounging on comfy pillows eating potato chips and watching reruns while someone tells us how wonderful we are?
4) The earthly death we suffer is not the end, but the beginning.
5) God's noble goals come intertwined with suffering.
Dr. Francis Collins: the same forces that produced a life-sustaining planet including the laws of physics, chemistry, weather and tectonics, can also produce natural disasters.
Here's John Polkinghorne: Cosmic Questions - Polkinghorne: The Problem of Evil
Why do you say that?Christians are confused.Why does God allow suffering and evil? Christians can answer:
1) It is good for God to give people freedom, but some people misuse their freedom and reject Jesus' call for forgiveness, kindness, and human dignity.
2) God also gives angels freedom. Some angels are fallen (like Satan) and cause suffering - for example bringing about natural disasters.
Satan and the Corruption of Nature: Seven Arguments – ReKnew
-
Book Review: Satan and the Problem of Evil: Constructing a Trinitarian Warfare Theodicy - Gregory A. Boyd
Satan has suffered defeats, but he is still powerful:
Ephesians 6:12 - For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
3) Suffering can lead to good. I'm sure we can all think of times when suffering has led to personal growth. What would life be without challenges? Should we spend our lives lounging on comfy pillows eating potato chips and watching reruns while someone tells us how wonderful we are?
4) The earthly death we suffer is not the end, but the beginning.
5) God's noble goals come intertwined with suffering.
Dr. Francis Collins: the same forces that produced a life-sustaining planet including the laws of physics, chemistry, weather and tectonics, can also produce natural disasters.
Here's John Polkinghorne: Cosmic Questions - Polkinghorne: The Problem of Evil
Angels don't have freedom - by definition.
There’s no translation needed to know God did not create evil. That can be solved by inspection.Yetzer means to form, as in to perfect.Wrong. Mankind has a choice between doing good and not doing good. So free will still exists. God did not create evil.According to @rylah’s logic had God not created evil then the Holocaust would have never have happened.
Wow you really scratching the bottom!
Let me help you out.
Had not G-d created evil inclination,
man wouldn't have the freedom to choose between good and evil.
And what did G-d call this 'not doing good?
The tree of good and...?
Ra means corrupted.
Ding means Ignore.
Short circuit- the experience of translating English to Hebrew
to define Hebrew words...
God did not create an evil inclination. God created a good inclination. Your understanding is flawed. Man is not inclined to evil. Man is inclined to good. Man must choose not to do good because his inclination his nature is good. It’s an artifact of intelligence. So it’s good that you don’t blame God for creating man’s evil inclination because he didn’t. Man is responsible for his choices and he can chose to do good or he can choose to not do good. But man’s nature and inclination which is from God, who is Holy, is good. Everything God created is good. Why is this so hard for you to comprehend?Not good.Wrong. Mankind has a choice between doing good and not doing good. So free will still exists. God did not create evil.According to @rylah’s logic had God not created evil then the Holocaust would have never have happened.
Wow you really scratching the bottom!
Let me help you out.
Had not G-d created evil inclination,
man wouldn't have the freedom to choose between good and evil.
And what did G-d call this 'not doing good?
The tree of good and...?
unless you want to blame God for creating evil. Is that what you want to do?
I don't blame G-d for creating the evil inclination,
rather thank G-d for allowing me the freedom of choice.
Big difference.
On the other hand, you call 2+2=-5 as "not much correct", and yet, it's wrong.
Imagine Olympic games where everyone gets a golden medal, including the guy who came to walk a 100m backwards, and purposefully hit every real sportsmen, who sweat in discipline for the last 4 years.
Moral relativism corrupts and devalues everything, for the sake of corruption.
Evil for the sake of evil.
Moral relativism is what Adam and Eve did when they were caught. They rationalized their wrong as a right. But their inclination was good which is why they blamed others for their failure. Because their inclination is good. Not evil. They recoiled not because they gained knowledge of good and evil but because they did wrong. The whole moral of this story is that man knows right from wrong and when he fails to do right rather than abandoning the concept he rationalizes he didn’t. He does this because his nature and inclination is good. If man’s inclination were evil he wouldn’t care. Everything you believe is wrong.Moral relativism corrupts and devalues everything, for the sake of corruption.
Evil for the sake of evil.
This is nonsense. This is the analogy for your flawed belief that God created evil and gave man an evil inclination. Does God have an evil inclination? No. So where did God get this evil to give man. Isn’t man created in God’s image? Yes. So if man has an evil inclination than God must have one too. So that is your 2+2=5 worldview.On the other hand, you call 2+2=-5 as "not much correct", and yet, it's wrong.
Imagine Olympic games where everyone gets a golden medal, including the guy who came to walk a 100m backwards, and purposefully hit every real sportsmen, who sweat in discipline for the last 4 years.
Actually he is wrong which makes you wrong. His being wrong makes me right because my position is diametrically opposed to his position and your position. My position is that everything God created is good so God is not responsible for what you two call evil. Man is. Man fails to choose to do the right thing. The OP understands what it means for God to create evil. Why can’t you? In a way it’s your fault the OP is calling God a genocidal prick.And yet, that's exactly what you suggested regarding the flood.See?Surely not the genocidal prick, Yahweh? If so, let's check that prick's morals.
Way to go rylah
He's wrong, and you're wrong - I'm not the one to blame for that.
Nice try - but you're both responsible for your own thoughts and deeds.
I disagree you are the one saying man is inclined to evil. I don’t believe you understand the literal meaning of inclination. I see way more good being done than evil so I don’t see how you can say man is inclined for evil.Neither, nor.And you wonder why so many Jews are atheist?
And people like the OP calls the G-d of Abraham a genocidal prick?
Two wrongs don't make you right.
Your entire thought process is based on wrong assumptions.
One argument at at time.And yet, that's exactly what you suggested regarding the flood.See?Surely not the genocidal prick, Yahweh? If so, let's check that prick's morals.
Way to go rylah
He's wrong, and you're wrong - I'm not the one to blame for that.
Nice try - but you're both responsible for your own thoughts and deeds.
You know what's curious, you claim you don't blame G-d for creating evil.
And yet though I'm not that dead Jew whom you worship as god,
that's exactly what you tried to do here.
Hilarious really.