Trump just slapped us all with a 10% tariff. That's above and beyond the 6% tax we pay. Does it really matter to you who's ******* you? Does it matter if it's the King of England or President of the USA? Regardless, Trump is ******* you with a 10% tariff.
1. We know this country was founded on treason and insurrection. What's your point?
Kings dont pass "duly passed laws" they impose tyranny by edict a concept rejected by American morals and law. The article is easily destroyed with a little common sense.A horde of White men disguised themselves as Native Americans — coppering their faces and donning headdresses in the same tradition that would lead to blackfaced minstrel shows decades later — to commit seditious conspiracy and destroy private property. The riotous mob trespassed on three ships and destroyed goods worth nearly $2 million in today’s money — all because they didn’t want to obey a duly passed law.
I love this article, if for nothing else that it speaks truths, while asking serious questions.
Opinion | Was the Boston Tea Party an act of terrorism? It depends.
The Boston Tea Party took on the British 250 years ago. It pitted one American value against another.web.archive.org
Opposition to a royal tyrant isnt insurrection its revolution
It was the Declaration that established the myth that George III was a tyrant. Yet George was the epitome of a constitutional monarch, deeply conscientious about the limits of his power. He never vetoed a single Act of Parliament, nor did he have any hopes or plans to establish anything approaching tyranny over his American colonies, which were among the freest societies in the world at the time of the Revolution: Newspapers were uncensored, there were rarely troops in the streets and the subjects of the 13 colonies enjoyed greater rights and liberties under the law than any comparable European country of the day.
Insurrection:
A king is objectively a tyrant
very topical these days
Non sequitur
