What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... an

Freewill

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
31,158
Reaction score
5,061
Points
1,130
Good news, I guess. I am not really sure what the temperature should be. My guess from Al Gore is something much cooler then it apparently is. Not sure of what he thinks is the right temperature.

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it

Read more: Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

article-2217286-157E3ADF000005DC-561_644x358.jpg
 

Inthemiddle

Rookie
Joined
Oct 4, 2011
Messages
6,354
Reaction score
675
Points
0
Good news, I guess. I am not really sure what the temperature should be. My guess from Al Gore is something much cooler then it apparently is. Not sure of what he thinks is the right temperature.

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it

Read more: Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

article-2217286-157E3ADF000005DC-561_644x358.jpg

I completely reject this report. It has too many assumptions in it.
 
OP
Freewill

Freewill

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
31,158
Reaction score
5,061
Points
1,130
I completely reject this report. It has too many assumptions in it.

What assumptions are you talking about? I would think you may have a dispute with the data but I didn't read a word that indicated to me they made assumptions. Of course with the computer models they do make a lot of assumptions which are proving not to be correct.
 

Charles_Main

AR15 Owner
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
16,692
Reaction score
2,248
Points
88
Location
Michigan, USA
I completely reject this report. It has too many assumptions in it.

What assumptions are you talking about? I would think you may have a dispute with the data but I didn't read a word that indicated to me they made assumptions. Of course with the computer models they do make a lot of assumptions which are proving not to be correct.

He is an idiot, the Whole GW argument is based on assumptions, Science is often Based on assumptions.

what does this have to do with Politics By the way, we have a whole section on the environment.
 

Charles_Main

AR15 Owner
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
16,692
Reaction score
2,248
Points
88
Location
Michigan, USA
Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, last week dismissed the significance of the plateau, saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.

I find this comment really funny. 15 or 16 years is not long enough to draw Conclusions. Their Entire Argument that things were Warming was based on 16 years of warming.
 
OP
Freewill

Freewill

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
31,158
Reaction score
5,061
Points
1,130
I think that the politics that surround GW is worthy of the Political forum. GW, in my opinion, is all about control and politics.
 

lukelk

VIP Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
1,191
Reaction score
109
Points
83
As someone in the field of science, this report is wrong, full of holes, and is quite dishonest.
 

Amazed

Rookie
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
1,947
Reaction score
128
Points
0
Location
Omaha, Nebraska
The whole GW hoax is dishonest.
 
OP
Freewill

Freewill

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
31,158
Reaction score
5,061
Points
1,130
As someone in the field of science, this report is wrong, full of holes, and is quite dishonest.

So your argument is against the chart? The data? What? Field of science could mean a whole lot of things.

So, answer one question, what should the temperature be?
 

NYcarbineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
117,063
Reaction score
13,865
Points
2,210
Location
Finger Lakes, NY
Does this mean we can start polluting again?
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
67,027
Reaction score
17,973
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, last week dismissed the significance of the plateau, saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.

I find this comment really funny. 15 or 16 years is not long enough to draw Conclusions. Their Entire Argument that things were Warming was based on 16 years of warming.
And we have retards here (*coughChrisOldRockscough*) who screech "GLOBAL WARMING!!!" if there's a couple of record high temps in a single day. :lmao:
 
Last edited:

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
67,027
Reaction score
17,973
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
As someone in the field of science, this report is wrong, full of holes, and is quite dishonest.
Pssst! Womyn's Studies isn't really science.
 

westwall

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
73,316
Reaction score
28,673
Points
2,250
Location
Nevada
Does this mean we can start polluting again?





Well of course it does. But only if you're a clueless lib jackwagon. We conservationists will still be cleaning up after you long after you're dead and buried.
 

IanC

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
11,064
Reaction score
1,315
Points
245
As someone in the field of science, this report is wrong, full of holes, and is quite dishonest.

So your argument is against the chart? The data? What? Field of science could mean a whole lot of things.

So, answer one question, what should the temperature be?

I love your sig, especially the supporters signing different sides of the cheque. but shouldnt the other part read "Just because President Obama said he was born in Kenya doesn't mean he wasn't"?
 

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
35,975
Reaction score
4,503
Points
1,140
Location
Not the middle of nowhere
Top story on DRUDGE right now.................


More k00k losing...............
 

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
35,975
Reaction score
4,503
Points
1,140
Location
Not the middle of nowhere
Here is a key statement from the article.................

Others disagreed. Professor Judith Curry, who is the head of the climate science department at America’s prestigious Georgia Tech university, told The Mail on Sunday that it was clear that the computer models used to predict future warming were ‘deeply flawed’.


All computer models on this are gay............the religion just doesnt accept any models except their own.:eusa_dance:


Dont forget too.......all these "conensus science" geeks have been living in a bubble for 2 decades rejecting anything that challenges the established narrative................

bubbletree01.jpg
 
Last edited:

IanC

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
11,064
Reaction score
1,315
Points
245
none


I dont see much difference other than the offset, and the slightly greater variance in UAH
 

IanC

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
11,064
Reaction score
1,315
Points
245
Good news, I guess. I am not really sure what the temperature should be. My guess from Al Gore is something much cooler then it apparently is. Not sure of what he thinks is the right temperature.

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it

Read more: Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

article-2217286-157E3ADF000005DC-561_644x358.jpg

does anyone have the actual covenance of this graph? did it come from the Met or did the newspaper just generate it?
 

Inthemiddle

Rookie
Joined
Oct 4, 2011
Messages
6,354
Reaction score
675
Points
0
What assumptions are you talking about?

Well, for starters, the notion that any global warming has been going on at all, as opposed to happenstance warmer temperatures for a few years. Then, there's the assumption that the time frame studied is a relevant sample set. That one is particularly troublesome, because even the past 100 years can only represent a snap-shot on a geological scale.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$191.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top