Global Warming Pie Chart

[Redfish]

Consensus: 97% of climate scientists agree

you do see that the y axis shows a temp variation of .5 degree---1/2 of a degree.

Do you really think that the temp measuring stations are that accurage?
What would you expect from a temp station that was in a forest in 1940 and is now on an asphalt parking lot? think it might be giving higher readings?

 

[ClosedCaption]

So many questions yet, no answers

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So many questions yet, no answers

My answer is don't spend trillions on such flimsy "evidence".

 

[ClosedCaption]

So many questions yet, no answers

My answer is don't spend trillions on such flimsy "evidence".

I agree, your evidence (or lack thereof) is flimsy

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So many questions yet, no answers

My answer is don't spend trillions on such flimsy "evidence".

I agree, your evidence (or lack thereof) is flimsy

My flimsy evidence doesn't require trillions in spending, your flimsy evidence does.

 

[ClosedCaption]

My answer is don't spend trillions on such flimsy "evidence".

I agree, your evidence (or lack thereof) is flimsy

My flimsy evidence doesn't require trillions in spending, your flimsy evidence does.

Your evidence would have to exist first...start there.

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars and if it did, how much is the earth worth to you? 1 million...2?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I agree, your evidence (or lack thereof) is flimsy

My flimsy evidence doesn't require trillions in spending, your flimsy evidence does.

Your evidence would have to exist first...start there.

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars and if it did, how much is the earth worth to you? 1 million...2?

What evidence do you feel I need to find? Evidence that the temperature changes?

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars

My link showed they wanted $14 trillion, at Davos, over the next 20 years.
You should tell them they don't need trillions.

 

[ClosedCaption]

My flimsy evidence doesn't require trillions in spending, your flimsy evidence does.

Your evidence would have to exist first...start there.

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars and if it did, how much is the earth worth to you? 1 million...2?

What evidence do you feel I need to find? Evidence that the temperature changes?

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars

My link showed they wanted $14 trillion, at Davos, over the next 20 years.
You should tell them they don't need trillions.

Evidence is something that provides a possible answer based on information. The more ppl review it and agree the more credible it becomes. So you saying "It's hot a my mamas house" is not evidence of anything.

Dude you are looking at it all wrong...I pay $200 for an airbag that never deploys its an investment, not a waste. Compare the $200 to what a hospital bill for a cracked skull and the impact on quality of life...Now that $200 looks like a bargain

So I ask you again, what is the earth worth to you? What is clean air worth?

If you give me a number at least we can compare to see if erring on the side of caution is smart or a dumb idea...Annnd go

 

[Mustang]

Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart | DeSmogBlog

Discuss..

There used to be ice a mile deep in my backyard, where'd it go? LOL!

How again is it that you know that there once used to be ice a mile thick where your back yard is now?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Your evidence would have to exist first...start there.

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars and if it did, how much is the earth worth to you? 1 million...2?

What evidence do you feel I need to find? Evidence that the temperature changes?

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars

My link showed they wanted $14 trillion, at Davos, over the next 20 years.
You should tell them they don't need trillions.

Evidence is something that provides a possible answer based on information. The more ppl review it and agree the more credible it becomes. So you saying "It's hot a my mamas house" is not evidence of anything.

Dude you are looking at it all wrong...I pay $200 for an airbag that never deploys its an investment, not a waste. Compare the $200 to what a hospital bill for a cracked skull and the impact on quality of life...Now that $200 looks like a bargain

So I ask you again, what is the earth worth to you? What is clean air worth?

If you give me a number at least we can compare to see if erring on the side of caution is smart or a dumb idea...Annnd go

Yes, $200 for an airbag is a bargain.

$14 trillion, for an airbag that doesn't work is stupid.

Buying an airbag that doubles the price of your gasoline is stupid.
Buying an airbag that destroys your economy so you have to sell the car is stupid.

Tell you what, if the socialists at Davos get their wish, $14 trillion over the next 20 years,
what will the concentration of CO2 be, compared to not spending the $14 trillion?

How much will the reduced CO2 level mean in reduced temperature?
Prove the investment is worth the cost.

 

[ClosedCaption]

What evidence do you feel I need to find? Evidence that the temperature changes?

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars

My link showed they wanted $14 trillion, at Davos, over the next 20 years.
You should tell them they don't need trillions.

Evidence is something that provides a possible answer based on information. The more ppl review it and agree the more credible it becomes. So you saying "It's hot a my mamas house" is not evidence of anything.

Dude you are looking at it all wrong...I pay $200 for an airbag that never deploys its an investment, not a waste. Compare the $200 to what a hospital bill for a cracked skull and the impact on quality of life...Now that $200 looks like a bargain

So I ask you again, what is the earth worth to you? What is clean air worth?

If you give me a number at least we can compare to see if erring on the side of caution is smart or a dumb idea...Annnd go

Yes, $200 for an airbag is a bargain.

$14 trillion, for an airbag that doesn't work is stupid.

Buying an airbag that doubles the price of your gasoline is stupid.
Buying an airbag that destroys your economy so you have to sell the car is stupid.

Tell you what, if the socialists at Davos get their wish, $14 trillion over the next 20 years,
what will the concentration of CO2 be, compared to not spending the $14 trillion?

How much will the reduced CO2 level mean in reduced temperature?
Prove the investment is worth the cost.

Everything in bold is shit you just make up without providing anything to back it up. Cool story bro, but no where near the truth.

So what is the earth or clean living conditions worth to you? A couple dollars? $100?

 

[Freewill]

Your evidence would have to exist first...start there.

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars and if it did, how much is the earth worth to you? 1 million...2?

What evidence do you feel I need to find? Evidence that the temperature changes?

And it doesnt require trillions of dollars

My link showed they wanted $14 trillion, at Davos, over the next 20 years.
You should tell them they don't need trillions.

Evidence is something that provides a possible answer based on information. The more ppl review it and agree the more credible it becomes. So you saying "It's hot a my mamas house" is not evidence of anything.

Dude you are looking at it all wrong...I pay $200 for an airbag that never deploys its an investment, not a waste. Compare the $200 to what a hospital bill for a cracked skull and the impact on quality of life...Now that $200 looks like a bargain

So I ask you again, what is the earth worth to you? What is clean air worth?

If you give me a number at least we can compare to see if erring on the side of caution is smart or a dumb idea...Annnd go

you are wrong on so many levels. GW and CC have nothing to do with polution, nothing.

The Earth, it does not care what we do.

Warm is better then cold, warm brings life, cold brings death.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart | DeSmogBlog

Discuss..

There used to be ice a mile deep in my backyard, where'd it go? LOL!

How again is it that you know that there once used to be ice a mile thick where your back yard is now?

I live in Chicago. That lake near my house, it used to be a glacier.

The tongue of the ice sheet that flowed into Illinois came from the north. It became known as the Lake Michigan Lobe because it flowed as a river of ice through the Lake Michigan Basin before it spread out into central Illinois. When the glacier reached its southernmost limit about 20,000 years ago, the ice was a mile thick at Chicago--

DNR

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Evidence is something that provides a possible answer based on information. The more ppl review it and agree the more credible it becomes. So you saying "It's hot a my mamas house" is not evidence of anything.

Dude you are looking at it all wrong...I pay $200 for an airbag that never deploys its an investment, not a waste. Compare the $200 to what a hospital bill for a cracked skull and the impact on quality of life...Now that $200 looks like a bargain

So I ask you again, what is the earth worth to you? What is clean air worth?

If you give me a number at least we can compare to see if erring on the side of caution is smart or a dumb idea...Annnd go

Yes, $200 for an airbag is a bargain.

$14 trillion, for an airbag that doesn't work is stupid.

Buying an airbag that doubles the price of your gasoline is stupid.
Buying an airbag that destroys your economy so you have to sell the car is stupid.

Tell you what, if the socialists at Davos get their wish, $14 trillion over the next 20 years,
what will the concentration of CO2 be, compared to not spending the $14 trillion?

How much will the reduced CO2 level mean in reduced temperature?
Prove the investment is worth the cost.

Everything in bold is shit you just make up without providing anything to back it up. Cool story bro, but no where near the truth.

So what is the earth or clean living conditions worth to you? A couple dollars? $100?

Tell you what, if the socialists at Davos get their wish, $14 trillion over the next 20 years,
what will the concentration of CO2 be, compared to not spending the $14 trillion?

How much will the reduced CO2 level mean in reduced temperature?
Prove the investment is worth the cost.

Or you could run away again?

 

[healthmyths]

Consensus: 97% of climate scientists agree

you do see that the y axis shows a temp variation of .5 degree---1/2 of a degree.

Do you really think that the temp measuring stations are that accurage?
What would you expect from a temp station that was in a forest in 1940 and is now on an asphalt parking lot? think it might be giving higher readings?

How can there be a global warming if 12.5% of the Earth's land mass is NOT included in the historical temperature stations.

"The number of [Siberian] stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present only four stations, those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…
The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world’s land mass.
The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.

Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit

 

[ClosedCaption]

Conjecture and irony believes you know the future and believes one theory (reducing by .5) while dismissing another (humans affect the earth)

The only difference being you want to believe one and don't want to believe the other. Both coming from scientists

 

[KissMy]

Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart | DeSmogBlog

Discuss..

There was a consensus that house prices never go down. It is not always best to follow the herd.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart | DeSmogBlog

Discuss..

There was a consensus that house prices never go down. It is not always best to follow the herd.

Yeah, because thats science

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart | DeSmogBlog

Discuss..

There was a consensus that house prices never go down. It is not always best to follow the herd.

Yeah, because thats science

If the socialists at Davos get their wish, $14 trillion over the next 20 years,
what will the concentration of CO2 be, compared to not spending the $14 trillion?

How much will the reduced CO2 level mean in reduced temperature?
Prove the investment is worth the cost.

 

[jon_berzerk]

There was a consensus that house prices never go down. It is not always best to follow the herd.

Yeah, because thats science

If the socialists at Davos get their wish, $14 trillion over the next 20 years,
what will the concentration of CO2 be, compared to not spending the $14 trillion?

How much will the reduced CO2 level mean in reduced temperature?
Prove the investment is worth the cost.

maybe the better question is

how much lower does the beat have to go

to lower C02