Global Warming Liars

[ding]

Hot and cold means they're right ... ha ha ha ha ha ... nothing to falsify ...

True but nobody will care because cold sucks.

 

[Crick]

D-O events warmed faster.

That doesn't authorize you to ignore the effect of increasing CO2.

 

[ding]

That doesn't authorize you to ignore the effect of increasing CO2.

What effects? CO2 does not drive climate change. You are completely ignoring natural climate variability as a cause for the recent warming trend when the geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends that were cause by natural climate variability.

 

[ding]

Does that sound right to you IS_JESS_AN_ACCOUNT ?

 

[Crick]

What effects? CO2 does not drive climate change. You are completely ignoring natural climate variability as a cause for the recent warming trend when the geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends that were cause by natural climate variability.

The geological record does not allow you to ignore CO2 and the greenhouse effect.

 

[ding]

The geological record does not allow you to ignore CO2 and the greenhouse effect.

Sure it does. It overwhelming confirms that prior to the industrial revolution that CO2 correlated to temperature due to the solubility of CO2 in water versus temperature. Which means that the geologic record overwhelming confirms that temperature does not correlate CO2. In other words, prior to the industrial revolution temperature determined what the atmospheric concentration of CO2 would be. That CO2 did not determine what the temperature would be.

That sound right to you Larsky ?

 

[ding]

Brave Larsky demonstrates his intellectual prowess on the subject with an emoticon as expected.

 

[Larsky]

Sure it does. It overwhelming confirms that prior to the industrial revolution that CO2 correlated to temperature due to the solubility of CO2 in water versus temperature. Which means that the geologic record overwhelming confirms that temperature does not correlate CO2. In other words, prior to the industrial revolution temperature determined what the atmospheric concentration of CO2 would be. That CO2 did not determine what the temperature would be.

That sound right to you Larsky ?

Sure it does. It overwhelming confirms that prior to the industrial revolution that CO2 correlated to temperature due to the solubility of CO2 in water versus temperature. Which means that the geologic record overwhelming confirms that temperature does not correlate CO2. In other words, prior to the industrial revolution temperature determined what the atmospheric concentration of CO2 would be. That CO2 did not determine what the temperature would be.

That sound right to you Larsky ?

"Overwhelmingly"

And I'll have to side with real science on this matter.

So, no. It makes no sense.
Have a happy new year!

 

[ding]

"Overwhelmingly"

And I'll have to side with real science on this matter.

So, no. It makes no sense.
Have a happy new year!

Have you looked at the data? No.

Are you even aware that CO2 lags temperature by ~800 years? No.

Are you aware that the natural phenomenon that causes a correlation between temperature and CO2 - throughout the long geologic record - is the solubility of CO2 in water versus temperature? No.

Are you aware that no one has proposed any other possible explanation for the correlation between temperature and CO2 because there is no other way that can explain the correlation? No.

That you are so ignorant on this subject and hold the opinion that you do means you are a fucking unthinking sheep.
So yeah, I'm going to have a great New Years because I can think for myself.

 

[ding]

And I'll have to side with real science on this matter.

Which you couldn't explain if your life depended upon it because you don't know the first thing about it. You believe it because your liberal buddies believe it. That's the only analysis you have ever made.

 

[psikeyhackr]

http://GlobalWarmingLiars.blogspot.com
Other greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, are omitted from graphs and discussion.
If in fact humans were the primary, or even major contributor to carbon dioxide production, then the highest concentrations of CO2 would be industrial and population centers around the globe, instead of the rain forests of Africa and South America:

If you read about Keeping he knew about CO2 being concentrated near factories and cities. That is the reason to NOT measure there. The whole point is to get a reasonable measure for the whole atmosphere not the concentration at a source that will eventually spread changing the global average.

These arguments that are transparently stupid with a little thought are amazing. It is like debates are only really about manipulating dummies who don't think.

 

[Dagosa]

http://GlobalWarmingLiars.blogspot.com

THE LIE: An overwhelming consensus of scientists support global warming.

This lie is based on a 2009 article by Maggie Kendall Zimmerman, then a student at the University of Illinois.
As stated in the Wall Street Journal, "The '97 percent' figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change. Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."
The WSJ went on to elaborate further: "The survey's questions don't reveal much of interest. Most scientists who are skeptical of catastrophic global warming nevertheless would answer "yes" to both questions. The survey was silent on whether the human impact is large enough to constitute a problem. Nor did it include solar scientists, space scientists, cosmologists, physicists, meteorologists or astronomers, who are the scientists most likely to be aware of natural causes of climate change."
So much for that lie one hears so often and so loudly.
THE LIE: Humans are causing catastrophic changes in earth's climate by burning fossil fuel and increasing carbon dioxide.
This lie is based on the extremely disingenuous and anti-scientific Keeling Curve, below.

This terribly misleading graph is intended to scare you into immediate action.
Just adding water vapor, which constitutes 1.5% of the atmosphere, or 15,000 parts per million, that graph above becomes this below, far more realistic, more honest, less misleading:


Other greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, are omitted from graphs and discussion.
If in fact humans were the primary, or even major contributor to carbon dioxide production, then the highest concentrations of CO2 would be industrial and population centers around the globe, instead of the rain forests of Africa and South America:

THE LIE: Global catastrophe, "tipping point"! We must do something now!
This incredible lie is preached by Al Gore, the United Nations, bureaucracies beholden to research billions, and by Barack Obama. Obama recently flew on Air Force One from Washington, D.C. to California, to play a round of golf with his friends, the same way he uses Air Force One to fly to Democrat fund-raisers all over the U.S.
Preaching doom and gloom to you little people is what they do, but not what they practice themselves. At the most recent Global Warming Scare-Fest, in Davos, Switzerland, the Scare-Mongers flew 1,700 private jets, rather than videoconference. Don't do as they do, do as they say.
Net global emission of CO2 looks nothing like human production of CO2. Rather, CO2 is the product of temperature and soil moisture.


THE LIE: Big oil billions are driving "deniers"
Budget requests from a few of the U.S. government agencies for global warming "research" money, just in 2011:

NOAA $437 million
NSF $480 million
NASA $438 million
DOE $627 million
DOI $171 million
EPA $169 million
USDA $159 million

ON OCTOBER 6, 2010, UC SANTA BARBARA PHYSICS PROFESSOR EMERITUS, HAROLD LEWIS, RESIGNED FROM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY IN PROTEST OF THE GLOBAL WARMING FRAUD. HIS LETTER READS IN PART:“FOR REASONS THAT WILL SOON BECOME CLEAR MY FORMER PRIDE AT BEING AN APS FELLOW ALL THESE YEARS HAS BEEN TURNED INTO SHAME, AND I AM FORCED, WITH NO PLEASURE AT ALL, TO OFFER YOU MY RESIGNATION FROM THE SOCIETY. “IT IS OF COURSE, THE GLOBAL WARMING SCAM, WITH THE (LITERALLY) TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS DRIVING IT, THAT HAS CORRUPTED SO MANY SCIENTISTS, AND HAS CARRIED APS BEFORE IT LIKE A ROGUE WAVE. IT IS THE GREATEST AND MOST SUCCESSFUL PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC FRAUD I HAVE SEEN IN MY LONG LIFE AS A PHYSICIST. ANYONE WHO HAS THE FAINTEST DOUBT THAT THIS IS SO SHOULD FORCE HIMSELF TO READ THE CLIMATEGATE DOCUMENTS, WHICH LAY IT BARE. (MONTFORD’S BOOK ORGANIZES THE FACTS VERY WELL.) I DON’T BELIEVE THAT ANY REAL PHYSICIST, NAY SCIENTIST, CAN READ THAT STUFF WITHOUT REVULSION. I WOULD ALMOST MAKE THAT REVULSION A DEFINITION OF THE WORD SCIENTIST. “SO WHAT HAS THE APS, AS AN ORGANIZATION, DONE IN THE FACE OF THIS CHALLENGE? IT HAS ACCEPTED THE CORRUPTION AS THE NORM, AND GONE ALONG WITH IT." - END OF QUOTE BY PROFESSOR LEWIS ​

​

NOBEL LAUREATE IN PHYSICS, IVER GIAIVER LIKEWISE RESIGNED IN DISGUST FROM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 OVER THIS ONGOING SCANDAL PARADING AS "SCIENCE". IT IS ANYTHING BUT.​

THE LIE: Why would scientists lie! For money, and for cowardice. They don't want to be blackballed by other cowards.

Who is the liar ? You claimed the periodic table was misnamed by every “ school “ in the world and only you knew it.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Since the fanatical Leftists of Google have cancelled my email account as well as forty of my websites for what I said about Hunter Biden being a pedophile, whom they protect with Gestapo tactics, the original website can no longer be accessed.
Please use this one in its place:
theglobalwarmingfraud

 

[otto105]

View attachment 776971

Since the fanatical Leftists of Google have cancelled my email account as well as forty of my websites for what I said about Hunter Biden being a pedophile, whom they protect with Gestapo tactics, the original website can no longer be accessed.
Please use this one in its place:
theglobalwarmingfraud

Go away with your national socialist bullshit snowflake.

 

[jc456]

Go away with your national socialist bullshit snowflake.

Ahhh, look at you snowflake

 

[otto105]

Ahhh, look at you snowflake

Thanks for the imitation snowflake.

Do you have to run to 4chan for your reaffirmations Stewart.

 

[jc456]

Thanks for the imitation snowflake.

Do you have to run to 4chan for your reaffirmations Stewart.

Always projecting from you

 

[otto105]

Always projecting from you

Again, can you name one scientific organization which will back your view on global climate change?

If not, why?

 

[psikeyhackr]

If you read about Keeping he knew about CO2 being concentrated near factories and cities.

Damn that was supposed to be Keeling! Was that the autocorrect artificial stupid?

 

[sealybobo]

View attachment 776971

Since the fanatical Leftists of Google have cancelled my email account as well as forty of my websites for what I said about Hunter Biden being a pedophile, whom they protect with Gestapo tactics, the original website can no longer be accessed.
Please use this one in its place:
theglobalwarmingfraud

I love 90 degree days in Michigan mid April and floods in Florida

Fort Lauderdale residents impacted by historic floods on edge as rain returns; FDEM director says progress made - WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA. (WSVN) - Strong thunderstorms returned to parts of Broward County, putting residents impacted by last week’s historic floods on edge.More rainfall was<a class="excerpt-read-more"...

wsvn.com

Do fish swim in the streets of Miami as Barack Obama said?

As the world watched President Barack Obama’s news conference about climate change, he drew on South Florida to illustra

www.politifact.com