PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
It just goes to prove that a statement repeated over and over will eventually be accepted as truth.
There are lot of folks who benefit from the belief that global warming is caused by man. There are the universities who get government funds to keep studying this fake phenomenon. There is also the government who can "scare" the public into thinking that they need government to help with this "problem." Government can use this as a vehicle to tax industries on CO2 emittance.
There is a ton of evidence that climate change is caused by cycles and cannot by changed by man.
Global View - WSJ.com
But mother nature has opinions of her own. NASA now begrudgingly confirms that the hottest year on record in the continental 48 was not 1998, as previously believed, but 1934, and that six of the 10 hottest years since 1880 antedate 1954. Data from 3,000 scientific robots in the world's oceans show there has been slight cooling in the past five years, never mind that "80% to 90% of global warming involves heating up ocean waters," according to a report by NPR's Richard Harris.
The Arctic ice cap may be thinning, but the extent of Antarctic sea ice has been expanding for years. At least as of February, last winter was the Northern Hemisphere's coldest in decades. In May, German climate modelers reported in the journal Nature that global warming is due for a decade-long vacation. But be not not-afraid, added the modelers: The inexorable march to apocalypse resumes in 2020.
This last item is, of course, a forecast, not an empirical observation. But it raises a useful question: If even slight global cooling remains evidence of global warming, what isn't evidence of global warming? What we have here is a nonfalsifiable hypothesis, logically indistinguishable from claims for the existence of God. This doesn't mean God doesn't exist, or that global warming isn't happening. It does mean it isn't science.
Hey, what about global warming on Mars. It must be all those SUV's out there...
There are lot of folks who benefit from the belief that global warming is caused by man. There are the universities who get government funds to keep studying this fake phenomenon. There is also the government who can "scare" the public into thinking that they need government to help with this "problem." Government can use this as a vehicle to tax industries on CO2 emittance.
There is a ton of evidence that climate change is caused by cycles and cannot by changed by man.
Global View - WSJ.com
But mother nature has opinions of her own. NASA now begrudgingly confirms that the hottest year on record in the continental 48 was not 1998, as previously believed, but 1934, and that six of the 10 hottest years since 1880 antedate 1954. Data from 3,000 scientific robots in the world's oceans show there has been slight cooling in the past five years, never mind that "80% to 90% of global warming involves heating up ocean waters," according to a report by NPR's Richard Harris.
The Arctic ice cap may be thinning, but the extent of Antarctic sea ice has been expanding for years. At least as of February, last winter was the Northern Hemisphere's coldest in decades. In May, German climate modelers reported in the journal Nature that global warming is due for a decade-long vacation. But be not not-afraid, added the modelers: The inexorable march to apocalypse resumes in 2020.
This last item is, of course, a forecast, not an empirical observation. But it raises a useful question: If even slight global cooling remains evidence of global warming, what isn't evidence of global warming? What we have here is a nonfalsifiable hypothesis, logically indistinguishable from claims for the existence of God. This doesn't mean God doesn't exist, or that global warming isn't happening. It does mean it isn't science.
Hey, what about global warming on Mars. It must be all those SUV's out there...
Last edited: