Well, we'll see how many others here sign onto your proclamation that the attacks on Palin's children were Sarah Palin's fault.
lol.
Not only was it her fault, using her baby to push her "pro life" agenda, and her daughter for the importance of "abstinence only" (a failed policy), but she entered into a national dogfight with a teenager - "Levi Johnson".
It demonstrates that Sarah Palin herself is immature and not ready for prime time.
Point of Order...
Abstinence continues to enjoy a 100% efficacy rate. Not a single female has ever been impregnated, where she chose to not allow a male sperm to gain access to her womb.
Except of course where someone rationalizes that their needs are more important than the rights of that woman... Whereupon if we can find 'em and the facts try to conviction, we'll kill'em for it.
What you're doing here is advancing a rationalization which is not only factually incorrect, but the construct of which is logically invalid and intellectually unsound.
Wherein you surrender that teenagers will have sex, and your answer is to simply authorize that be misinforming them that they have a RIGHT to murder their unborn child to avoid the responsibility for their actions; or to use some form of contraception to avoid responsibility for their actions...
It's IRRATIONAL!