Germany has surpassed the United States in ammunition production capacity

[Litwin]

Remember the last time Germany was unified and heavily built up their arms. Not good news. The whole world is going in the wrong direction.

Only because we ignored the predatory nature of Moscow Bolshevik imperialism. We could have easily finished off the Bolshevik gang in 1917–18. And Germany would never have turned to National Socialism.

Post in thread 'Was Bolshevik Lenin a German Spy? Germany Sealed Train for the Bolshevik gang'

Apr 25, 2026

• Litwin

 

[Kruska]

A good point. Still:

1. They have a great — maybe too great — military tradition.
2. No one else can lead Europe: population size, economy, stable credit balance, industries, etc.

That "military tradition" passed away in 1945. And the USA and the Europeans made sure of it for 71 years.

Since it is all simply and only about $$ - yes, that is were Germany has it's present standing from.
From the point of view of military expertise and political leadership capabilities - I could only hope for the UK or Sweden to take the leadership of a European Army.

 

[DonGlock26]

the Jochi project (empire) has run out of gas. The Bolshevik´s empire is gone, the Romanov´s empire is gone. NEVER 2 WITHOUT 3, the Saddam Putsein ´s empire will follow!

Jochi - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Good luck.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Danish straits?​

Hormuz straits.

 

[Litwin]

Good luck.

DO YOU REMEMBER 1991?

 

[Litwin]

That "military tradition" passed away in 1945. And the USA and the Europeans made sure of it for 71 years.

Since it is all simply and only about $$ - yes, that is were Germany has it's present standing from.
From the point of view of military expertise and political leadership capabilities - I could only hope for the UK or Sweden to take the leadership of a European Army.

Many interesting points. So you think that Germany (with our support) cannot bring back its old militaristic tradition?

The UK is not part of the EU. Scandinavia (with UK support) already leads NATO against Moscow imperialism. The Scandinavian states are way too small to lead NATO full‑time. Some politicians ask France to lead NATO. What do you think about France?

 

[Norm Paperman]

We cant produce enough for ourselves and the Euros

So as long as they dont turn the weapons on us it will be ok

Of course they can, what the US cannot do is afford for the government to buy enough arms to keep them all in business.

The US is closing in on 40 trillion in debt and 130% debt to GDP ratio.

 

[Litwin]

Hormuz straits.

Nobody (no country) in Europe is going to fight for Israel against Iran. Germany has the strongest support for Israel, but they simply don’t do wars anymore. I’d rather see Israel fight for Germany if Germany were attacked. European post‑modernist mentality would choose to take "back" all Jews rather than fight wars to protect the Jewish state. Without US Christian Zionism, Israel is cooked

 

[Litwin]

 

[DonGlock26]

DO YOU REMEMBER 1991?

View attachment 1248337

Yep, I watched it on TV. I was happy to see communism collapse.

 

[Kruska]

Many interesting points. So you think that Germany (with our support) cannot bring back its old militaristic tradition?

Not with the present mainstream parties and a US/Israel brainwashed German society over the cause of 81 years.

The UK is not part of the EU.

Doesn't matter - they are still Europeans.

Scandinavia (with UK support) already leads NATO against Moscow imperialism. The Scandinavian states are way too small to lead NATO full‑time. Some politicians ask France to lead NATO. What do you think about France?”

Sweden doesn't lead NATO against Russia - Sweden assumed command of NATO's Forward Land Forces in Finland for the next 6 month. Sweden IMO is the best organized military force in both military and civilian regards in Europe. Taking their "only" 11 million population into account their military structure and weaponry is probably the best in Europe.

France is politically very unstable - and if it comes to national interests, they will place them above a "united Europe", or a European army. The UK if they stop being the #1 US ball-carriers they have a far more practical and balanced approach towards Europe then France. However TACO is already preparing for the UK to get dragged into another Malvina's issue.

So IMO, the Swedish approach in military and civilian protection is the best one Europe could take.

 

[Litwin]

Yep, I watched it on TV. I was happy to see communism collapse.

So why do you think that the smaller version of the Bolshevik empire won’t collapse the same way? Don’t you think that the age of empires has passed?

The Inevitable Fall of Putin’s New Russian Empire

What history tells us about collapsed empires trying to restore their former possessions.

foreignpolicy.com

 

[Litwin]

Germany has published its first military strategy in the history of the federal republic.

 

[Litwin]

STUBB: Most credible security guarantee Ukraine has right now is 800,000-strong armed force and capacity to conduct modern warfare unlike any other NATO member state.

 

[Ringo]

 

[Litwin]

“Guys, we need to change — everything needs changing! Otherwise, we’re f*cking screwed!”
- ivan

 

[Litwin]

Not with the present mainstream parties and a US/Israel brainwashed German society over the cause of 81 years.

Doesn't matter - they are still Europeans.

Sweden doesn't lead NATO against Russia - Sweden assumed command of NATO's Forward Land Forces in Finland for the next 6 month. Sweden IMO is the best organized military force in both military and civilian regards in Europe. Taking their "only" 11 million population into account their military structure and weaponry is probably the best in Europe.

France is politically very unstable - and if it comes to national interests, they will place them above a "united Europe", or a European army. The UK if they stop being the #1 US ball-carriers they have a far more practical and balanced approach towards Europe then France. However TACO is already preparing for the UK to get dragged into another Malvina's issue.

So IMO, the Swedish approach in military and civilian protection is the best one Europe could take.

1) Agreed on France.

2) Swedish, not Finnish? Sweden is one of the best (by European standards) when it comes to military and civilian protection. But Finns are so much better — that’s why Trump likes them, and why the entire world wants to meet Finnish officials and ask one question: why aren’t they afraid of the evil Moscow empire.

3) What about Norway? They can be attacked at any moment, but they do so little today? Is it because they are afraid of a Moscow attack.

Finland as one of the most resilient countries in Europe: Inspiration not only for the Czech Republic

Civil defence in Finland is not just about the military or security forces – it is a society-wide approach that is deeply rooted in the country's history and…

www.czdefence.com