Right?
But, I'm more the fool for arguing with him, I guess.
What has been the motivation of CBP to get rid of numerous tourists this year for seemingly unknown reasons? They've been handed a directive from Trump to scrutinize incoming travelers. And since the CBP directive is a loyalist Trump appointee, he'll go overboard doing his job. Look at how ICE has caused an international incident shackling and detaining Hyundai workers. What is the motivation for ICE to potentially cost Georgia thousands of jobs? When asking about motivation, all you have to do is look at what's driving the policy.
I doubt that the CBP director was personally involved in this. Unless he has given an order to "call me if any cute young fraudsters get caught."
American students who backpack through Europe are not choosing to stay in, say, super expensive Zurich for 5 weeks and then heading to the next most expensive city of Paris for who knows how long. Staying in Zurich alone for that length of time would wipe out whatever budget they had saved for traveling throughout Europe, maybe 2x over. Backpacking through Europe doesn't mean living in cities for weeks at a time.
I feel like I have to look up stuff just to prove you're making it up as you go along. So, we're on the same sheet, are you saying that you know these girls are fabulously wealthy, or that they "might" be fabulously wealthy as you said in a previous post?
Either way:
Hostels, presumably the cheapest one they can find always have to be booked ahead of time to insure rates and availability. No one is flying into Hawaii with no hotel bookings, looking to walk into a "cheap" hostel at the peak of spring break, ffs.
No, but they could very well fly in hoping to sleep on the beach, get picked up in a bar, or just fall in with some student vacationers who would invite them to stay with them. Pretty girls with smarts can always find a way.
But it isn't up to me to prove any of that. The rules say you have to have a reservation for the type of visa one of them had (the other had none), and they did not follow that rule.
Newsflash, no one from Europe who comes to America for a few weeks does it either, because it's completely unrealistic and defeats the whole purpose of traveling the world. Cleaning someone's yard wouldn't even pay the hotel fee for that day, lol.
Are you this niave, seriously? They weren't coming to America for a few weeks, they were there to make as much money as they could and likely look for a way to get a green card. People come to American for that purpose all the time (or at least they used to, heh, heh), so why is that so impossible in this case? Because they are not brown?
Dude, check your privilege. Germans are not as rich as Americans.
I'm not buying the whole traveling cheap angle you're pushing. They lived in New Zealand for a few weeks before eventually landing in Honolulu during spring break season, making an already expensive trip more expensive and without booking a hotel in order to get the best prices. None of this is possible on the average 18 year old's income, whatever that may be.
Okay. Don't "buy it."
They broke the rules, they got sent home. Happens all the time. The only difference is these girls are white and cute, not some vaqueros who rode over the Big River hidden in a hay truck.
There was a German exchange student in my high school PE class. They let us drive our cars to the bowling alley one day for a field trip. One of my group started smoking pot and the German kid got very upset. "If I get in trouble, I'll be back in Germany in 24 hours!" Germans know the rules. When they break them, it is no accident.
Break the rules, get sent home. I guess you were so used to the Biden era that such a simple concept doesn't make sense to you.
It's not a rule. But if you arrive in the US without hotel bookings you'll be questioned by CBP, but this has never been an excuse to strip search, lock up and then deport someone.
I assume they do that to everyone caught in the country illegally. They should, even if that was paused for four years.
I could speculate all day, but if you think the law was broken in sending these young ladies home, explain why CBP treated them differently than any other rule breakers.
Do you think that the female CPB officers that strip searched them were doing it for thrills? I think you've seen too many chicks in prison movies.
They were trying to be spontaneous, which is what they stated and is exactly why I didn’t think they were just some broke backpackers looking to rake leaves in Hawaii for a few bucks, as you’re suggesting. Spontaneity is a privilege of the wealthy or well to do.
I never said anything about raking leaves for a few bucks. Now you're just lying. One more and we're done here.
An average person much less an 18 year old couldn’t do what they did unless they were willing to burn through money needlessly in case something unexpected happened.
Oh, I see. You're not from my generation.
In my day, an eighteen year old was an adult, and we were not afraid to go out into the world, even if we didn't have much money. I guess that thing about the bowling alley field trip surprised you. The class was called "individual sports," and it was PE for kids who hated PE but needed the credit. No one thought it strange that high school "kids" could be allowed to drive themselves to a bowling alley on school time, or that I owned a car I bought with money I worked for after lying about my age to work at Church's Fried.
I suppose the participation trophy generation will never know what it is like to "light out for the territories" as Mark Twain said. Not your fault. I feel bad for you, that you missed out on it. It was a great time, and we didn't know how great it was.
I am more than willing to make concessions on any rational argument.
Clearly you are not. Not ever.
There's a bit of logic missing from your scenario. If they had access to a job like that in Hawaii, they could have simply given the address of the homeowner they would be staying at and CBP would have been forced to let them go instead of giving them the requisite cavity search for not booking a hotel.
I'm not saying that they had that job already. I'm saying that is an example of a job they might have beeen seeking. Maybe they wanted to wait tables, or become personal shoppers. Or work on a fishing boat making drinks for tourists for tips.
Whatever.
They are young and probably didn't think it through, or they would have made sure their visas were in order and that they had a place to stay. But this trip was a great learning experience, that will bring a maturity that Americans of your generation missed out on. With many, many exceptions, but it wasn't the rule as it was for my generation.
Even if this was the only thing I talked about on USMB, which it by far is not, I'm not sure why this would bother you so much. Why is it relevant to the debate?
It isn't. I was just curious. You seem like you would be a person who is very concerned that illegal aliens who were given "a legal status" get tax-funded health care, but I don't see you talking about that. You're stuck on this. Which is fine.
Sure, you talk about these young ladies all you like. I would wish for you to meet them. I think you could learn a lot from their initiative.
In a more innocent time, i.e. before the previous administrations open border disaster, I might have rooted for them to stay. But the bad apples, i.e. Border Czar Harris, spoiled it for everyone. We have to be cautious, even German girls.
Besides, if they had let the German girls go through with no scrutiny and then went over the next group - young males from the middle east - with a fine toothed comb, you would be on here crying racial profiling.
You said you could admit things?
Admit that.
But I'm not the one here critiquing why someone else chooses to talk about it. I'm not bothered by other people debating me over it.
Okay, then.
What else you got about these diese Mädchen?