Anarchy is an ultimate far right wing ideology.....
It depends on how you are defining left and right wing. Is an anarcho-communist right wing?
I'll let you decide, because I am sick of trying to distinguish the difference between left and right wing. They are trap words if anything, and semantics are dangerous to any ideology. Both words should be ridden from existence, ideally.
Unfortunately you have a propensity to disagree and denigrate posters, when they agree with you.
Clearly you are very well informed on anarchism, but your debate tactics are to denigrate all, even those who agree with you. This approach does you little benefit.
I think it is also a cultural divide.
Onyx is clearly a very well educated and intellectual poster, but my suspicion is, he is either not American, or his roots are not American.
For instance, he insists that Anarchism can only be ONE THING.
I noticed him making the claim that Anarchist MUST be violent to overthrow the machinery of the state.
However, the American brand of individual libertarian/anarchism just doesn't go there. We have a tradition of live and let live, of passive resistance, of bringing enlightenment to the masses, one person at a time. We can imagine a future where the state collapses because of it's own corruption, greed, inefficiency, bloat, etc. (In fact, I know many an American Anarchist that wouldn't mind seeing Hillary win for this very reason, they think she will hasten the demise of the State all that much quicker!

)
When Onyx speaks of all the great and notable anarchic philosophers, he leaves off Mr. Spooner.
Lysander was at the First International with all the other European notables; Marx, Bakunin, and Kropotkin.
Spooner advocated what he called Natural Law – or the "Science of Justice" – wherein acts of initiatory coercion against individuals and their property were considered "illegal" but the so-called criminal acts that violated only man-made legislation were not.[2]
Lysander Spooner - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://mises.org/system/tdf/Left and Right_3_1_7.pdf?file=1&type=document
It takes a special sort of mind to recognize that the slaves in the south had a right to a servile insurrection, but the federal government had NO RIGHT to use violence to wage war on the southern states in order to force them to remain in the union.
Spooner was vehemently against slavery, as it was coercive and against natural law. However, he also saw that the central government had no authority to force the citizens of the south to participate in a government that they had no wish to participate in.
Needless to say, he did not have many friends, either in the south or in the north. Even today, many do not see the genius of the man. If we had, we would have a much more free republic where the individual states had their proper power and sovereignty vis-à-vis the federal government. And we would have avoided a terrible, bloody conflict.
But then, we can't expect a violent European Anarchist to understand the voluntarism leanings of American Anarchists. .
I guess he doesn't realize that the greatest hope against the Orwellian NWO are these very same American Anarchists that work day in and day out to raise the consciousness of their fellow man about what is going on. It won't be European or Ukrainian anarchist philosophical underpinnings putting the breaks on and securing liberty for the individual men and women of the planet, it will be the American ones, with their firm grasp of their philosophical forefathers.
Mr. Spooner will have far more to do with that liberty and peace than violent men like Nestor Makhno.