General Michael Flynn Speaks Again

Dragonlady

Designing Woman
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
27,313
Reaction score
9,705
Points
910
Location
Niagara Escarpment
The Democrat Party has been taken over by extreme leftists and is no longer a supporter of American ideals and the rights of the American citizens. A globalist/communist movement is under way within what used to be the Democrat Party.

Notice I said "Democrat Party" instead of "Democratic Party". There is nothing democratic about it.

The elected Congress members both in the Senate and the House vote in lockstep with their own Dear Leaders rather than according to the will of the people that elected them.

There is no democratic representation of the American people.

The Epoch Times. Big whoop! Do you have a real source?
What is a real source for you Communist News Network? :D :D :D:laughing0301:
One that doesn’t come up “Tin foil hat conspiracy site” on the fact checker.

No. I have Global, CBC, and BBC. FOX is free here but I won’t even watch that shit for free.
 

The VOR

Gold Member
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
8,777
Reaction score
1,657
Points
280
Notice I said "Democrat Party" instead of "Democratic Party".
When I first saw you incorrectly spell the name of The Democratic Party, I just assumed you were an uneducated, ignorant moron like the majority of your right wing brethren who don't know how to spell.

You proved me wrong. You actually do know how to properly spell the name of the party, but you are still an ignorant moron, and delusional.

Oh, I almost forgot, Flynn is a worthless scumbag who should be in prison.
You just proved the OP's post so congrats.
Wrong, shit-for-brains.
 

bendog

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
35,984
Reaction score
4,752
Points
1,140
Location
Dog House in back yard
The Democrat Party has been taken over by extreme leftists and is no longer a supporter of American ideals and the rights of the American citizens. A globalist/communist movement is under way within what used to be the Democrat Party.

Notice I said "Democrat Party" instead of "Democratic Party". There is nothing democratic about it.

The elected Congress members both in the Senate and the House vote in lockstep with their own Dear Leaders rather than according to the will of the people that elected them.

There is no democratic representation of the American people.

 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
44,970
Reaction score
5,666
Points
1,870
General Flynn was never convicted of a crime
False.
Flynn’s alleged “crime” of “lying” to the FBI is disputed by actual notes made by agents who interviewed him


No, thats a lie.
 

Sunsettommy

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
6,786
Reaction score
4,094
Points
1,050
General Flynn was never convicted of a crime
False.
Flynn’s alleged “crime” of “lying” to the FBI is disputed by actual notes made by agents who interviewed him


No, thats a lie.
Fort Fun Indiana is too lazy to read, from the link he avoids:


Jonathan Turley tweeted: President Obama is being quoted on Flynn, saying “There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.” It is a curious statement. First and foremost, Flynn was not charged with perjury. Second, we now know Obama discussed charging Flynn under the Logan Act which has never been used successfully to convict anyone and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Third, this reaffirms reports that Obama was personally invested in this effort. Finally, there is precedent. There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals. The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case.That was requested by President Obama’s own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan. How is that for precedent?
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
44,970
Reaction score
5,666
Points
1,870
General Flynn was never convicted of a crime
False.
Flynn’s alleged “crime” of “lying” to the FBI is disputed by actual notes made by agents who interviewed him


No, thats a lie.
Fort Fun Indiana is too lazy to read, from the link he avoids:


Jonathan Turley tweeted: President Obama is being quoted on Flynn, saying “There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.” It is a curious statement. First and foremost, Flynn was not charged with perjury. Second, we now know Obama discussed charging Flynn under the Logan Act which has never been used successfully to convict anyone and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Third, this reaffirms reports that Obama was personally invested in this effort. Finally, there is precedent. There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals. The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case.That was requested by President Obama’s own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan. How is that for precedent?
Hmm, sorry.... you .lied and misrepresented what they said. You know this. You simply take these absurd positions and take them to your grave.
 

Sunsettommy

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
6,786
Reaction score
4,094
Points
1,050
General Flynn was never convicted of a crime
False.
Flynn’s alleged “crime” of “lying” to the FBI is disputed by actual notes made by agents who interviewed him


No, thats a lie.
Fort Fun Indiana is too lazy to read, from the link he avoids:


Jonathan Turley tweeted: President Obama is being quoted on Flynn, saying “There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.” It is a curious statement. First and foremost, Flynn was not charged with perjury. Second, we now know Obama discussed charging Flynn under the Logan Act which has never been used successfully to convict anyone and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Third, this reaffirms reports that Obama was personally invested in this effort. Finally, there is precedent. There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals. The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case.That was requested by President Obama’s own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan. How is that for precedent?
Hmm, sorry.... you .lied and misrepresented what they said. You know this. You simply take these absurd positions and take them to your grave.
It is so predictable that leftists like YOU can't dispute what long running Democrat Attorney Jonathan Turley states.

New Documents Show Strzok Countermanded Closure Of Flynn Case For Lack Of Crime – JONATHAN TURLEY

You keep ignoring the documented release revelations of illegal FBI harassments of Flynn who was already released from the FBI for no wrongdoing.

======

Here is a long list of expose of Flynn being screwed over:

Search Results for “General Flynn” – JONATHAN TURLEY
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
44,970
Reaction score
5,666
Points
1,870
General Flynn was never convicted of a crime
False.
Flynn’s alleged “crime” of “lying” to the FBI is disputed by actual notes made by agents who interviewed him


No, thats a lie.
Fort Fun Indiana is too lazy to read, from the link he avoids:


Jonathan Turley tweeted: President Obama is being quoted on Flynn, saying “There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.” It is a curious statement. First and foremost, Flynn was not charged with perjury. Second, we now know Obama discussed charging Flynn under the Logan Act which has never been used successfully to convict anyone and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Third, this reaffirms reports that Obama was personally invested in this effort. Finally, there is precedent. There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals. The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case.That was requested by President Obama’s own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan. How is that for precedent?
Hmm, sorry.... you .lied and misrepresented what they said. You know this. You simply take these absurd positions and take them to your grave.
It is so predictable that leftists like YOU can't dispute what long running Democrat Attorney Jonathan Turley states.

New Documents Show Strzok Countermanded Closure Of Flynn Case For Lack Of Crime – JONATHAN TURLEY

You keep ignoring the documented release revelations of illegal FBI harassments of Flynn who was already released from the FBI for no wrongdoing.

======

Here is a long list of expose of Flynn being screwed over:

Search Results for “General Flynn” – JONATHAN TURLEY
Cute red herring! Sorry, nobody claimed he didn't lie. When you said that, you were lying. And the truth of whether or not he lied isn't a matter of anyone's opinion anyway, it's a matter of the facts. Which is why Flynn pled guilty under oath twice and publicly admitted guilt a third time.
 

Thoth001

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
1,167
Reaction score
926
Points
1,893
General Flynn was never convicted of a crime
False.
Flynn’s alleged “crime” of “lying” to the FBI is disputed by actual notes made by agents who interviewed him


No, thats a lie.
Fort Fun Indiana is too lazy to read, from the link he avoids:


Jonathan Turley tweeted: President Obama is being quoted on Flynn, saying “There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.” It is a curious statement. First and foremost, Flynn was not charged with perjury. Second, we now know Obama discussed charging Flynn under the Logan Act which has never been used successfully to convict anyone and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Third, this reaffirms reports that Obama was personally invested in this effort. Finally, there is precedent. There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals. The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case.That was requested by President Obama’s own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan. How is that for precedent?
Hmm, sorry.... you .lied and misrepresented what they said. You know this. You simply take these absurd positions and take them to your grave.
It is so predictable that leftists like YOU can't dispute what long running Democrat Attorney Jonathan Turley states.

New Documents Show Strzok Countermanded Closure Of Flynn Case For Lack Of Crime – JONATHAN TURLEY

You keep ignoring the documented release revelations of illegal FBI harassments of Flynn who was already released from the FBI for no wrongdoing.

======

Here is a long list of expose of Flynn being screwed over:

Search Results for “General Flynn” – JONATHAN TURLEY
Cute red herring! Sorry, nobody claimed he didn't lie. When you said that, you were lying. And the truth of whether or not he lied isn't a matter of anyone's opinion anyway, it's a matter of the facts. Which is why Flynn pled guilty under oath twice and publicly admitted guilt a third time.
Some may wonder why an innocent man would ever plead guilty. Anyone who knows how the system works in practice would understand why an innocent man—or a defendant in a close case—might be coerced into pleading guilty. The cruel reality is that if a defendant pleads not guilty and is found guilty, the sentence will be far greater than if he had pled guilty—perhaps even 10 times greater. Moreover, in this case, it is alleged that the government threatened, if Flynn did not plead guilty, to indict his son. These are the kinds of pressures routinely used by prosecutors. Civil libertarians have long been critical of these pressures, but fair-weather civil libertarians refuse to object when these improper tactics are used against Trump's associates. Partisan hypocrisy reigns.

 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,630
Reaction score
6,956
Points
1,130
General Flynn was never convicted of a crime
False.
Flynn’s alleged “crime” of “lying” to the FBI is disputed by actual notes made by agents who interviewed him


No, thats a lie.
Fort Fun Indiana is too lazy to read, from the link he avoids:


Jonathan Turley tweeted: President Obama is being quoted on Flynn, saying “There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.” It is a curious statement. First and foremost, Flynn was not charged with perjury. Second, we now know Obama discussed charging Flynn under the Logan Act which has never been used successfully to convict anyone and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Third, this reaffirms reports that Obama was personally invested in this effort. Finally, there is precedent. There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals. The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case.That was requested by President Obama’s own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan. How is that for precedent?
Flynn was convicted of lying to the FBI.

1607588681673.png



And there's zero dispute to if Flynn lied to the FBI. Flynn admitted to doing exactly that.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top