Gen. Flynn case about to blow up in Dimwinger's faces.

[Mac-7]

The lack of an underlying crime is relevant because the FBI does not have enough people, money or time to go after all the real crimes floating around Washington and should not be piddling away its efforts on tacky-tack bullshit

Still not relevant. Lying to the FBI is still a crime. Just like lying under oath. What was Bill Clinton's underlying crime? What was Scooter Libby's underlying crime? Yet they both faced prosecution for lying under oath or to federal investigators.

The FBI agents that interviewed Flynn said he did not lie...the deep state set him up for a fall....come on man you know that is true by now don't you?...Flynn will walk even if it takes a presidential pardon....and the people will stand behind it as well....

That's not what they said. What they said was, "[Flynn] did not give any indicators of deception." Meaning his demeanor was not indicative of lying. Not that he wasn't lying. We know he lied. He even admitted it. Pence admitted it. Impeached Trump admitted to it. Flynn even pled guilty to lying to them.

Flynn had no reason to lie

or, if his lawyer advised him to say nothing the rogue FBI agents would have had NOTHING to use against flynn because there was no underlying crime

but no lawyer was there because flynn was not advised of his miranda rights

You have to be in law enforcement custody first, and then them questioning you, to be given Miranda rights. L/E can arrest you, and charge you, and never question you after the arrest, and they never give you your Miranda rights warning, because they do not apply, EXCEPT IF BEING QUESTIONED after an arrest and in their custody.

If they never question you in their custody, you are never given your Miranda warning.

The Flynn case judge addressed this, in the court, and it is in the court transcripts covering it as well.

AND if you are being questioned by law enforcement, and voluntarily come in for the L/E questioning, if you are not arrested and in their custody, miranda rights are not given...

UNLESS you say you don't want to answer the question, or request a lawyer... when you do that, then all questioning has to stop by L/E, and the investigators let you get your lawyer.... is what I just read...

The judge is a quack

if the defendant is not informed that he is under investigation and needs a lawyer then nothing he says to the rogue FBI agents should be used against him

flynn was set up by the Deep State

 

[Mac-7]

Yet is flynn had told the FBI “Sure I talked to the russians” ,which is not a crime, that would be the end of it

100% wrong. Flynn lied about the content of those discussions.

Yes, a process crime with no underlying crime

 

[Faun]

Still not relevant. Lying to the FBI is still a crime. Just like lying under oath. What was Bill Clinton's underlying crime? What was Scooter Libby's underlying crime? Yet they both faced prosecution for lying under oath or to federal investigators.

The FBI agents that interviewed Flynn said he did not lie...the deep state set him up for a fall....come on man you know that is true by now don't you?...Flynn will walk even if it takes a presidential pardon....and the people will stand behind it as well....

That's not what they said. What they said was, "[Flynn] did not give any indicators of deception." Meaning his demeanor was not indicative of lying. Not that he wasn't lying. We know he lied. He even admitted it. Pence admitted it. Impeached Trump admitted to it. Flynn even pled guilty to lying to them.

Flynn had no reason to lie

or, if his lawyer advised him to say nothing the rogue FBI agents would have had NOTHING to use against flynn because there was no underlying crime

but no lawyer was there because flynn was not advised of his miranda rights

You have to be in law enforcement custody first, and then them questioning you, to be given Miranda rights. L/E can arrest you, and charge you, and never question you after the arrest, and they never give you your Miranda rights warning, because they do not apply, EXCEPT IF BEING QUESTIONED after an arrest and in their custody.

If they never question you in their custody, you are never given your Miranda warning.

The Flynn case judge addressed this, in the court, and it is in the court transcripts covering it as well.

AND if you are being questioned by law enforcement, and voluntarily come in for the L/E questioning, if you are not arrested and in their custody, miranda rights are not given...

UNLESS you say you don't want to answer the question, or request a lawyer... when you do that, then all questioning has to stop by L/E, and the investigators let you get your lawyer.... is what I just read...

The judge is a quack

if the defendant is not informed that he is under investigation and needs a lawyer then nothing he says to the rogue FBI agents should be used against him

flynn was set up by the Deep State

Wrong. He was not in custody. Therefore, thevFBIbhad no legal obligation to read him his Miranda rights.

 

[Faun]

Yet is flynn had told the FBI “Sure I talked to the russians” ,which is not a crime, that would be the end of it

100% wrong. Flynn lied about the content of those discussions.

Yes, a process crime with no underlying crime

Like Bill Clinton?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes, a process crime with no underlying crime

I.E., a serious felony. And yes, there was an underlying crime.

 

[bodecea]

It just keeps getting better...lol

Goddamn loons are a bunch of incompetent dopes

Has that Flynn case blown up yet?

 

[Nostra]

Comey, Clapper, Strzok................their manipulation and tampering with evidence and testimony is about to get exposed.


An explosive new court filing from Michael Flynn’s legal team alleges that FBI agents manipulated official records of the former national security adviser’s 2017 interview that led to him being charged with lying to investigators. It's Flynn's lawyers latest attempt to get the case thrown out.

Sidney Powell, Flynn’s attorney, filed a 37-page motion on Thursday, outlining several big allegations, once again requesting the government produce all evidence as it relates to Flynn — urging the court to “dismiss the entire prosecution for outrageous government misconduct” and hold the prosecutors in contempt.

FLYNN LAWYER WANTS PROSECUTORS TO TURN OVER CELLPHONES FROM MYSTERIOUS PROFESSOR LINKED TO RUSSIA PROBE

The entire case stemmed from that FBI interview where Flynn was asked about his conversations with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn ultimately pleaded guilty to making false statements regarding those conversations during his interview, as part of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

But as his legal team goes on offense in the long-running and still unresolved court proceedings, Powell alleged that FBI officials manipulated Flynn’s FBI 302 — a form used by agents to report or summarize interviews. It's not clear who may have done the alleged editing, though ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok was involved in the original interview.

“Those changes added an unequivocal statement that ‘Flynn stated he did not’ — in response to whether Mr. Flynn had asked Kislyak to vote in a certain manner or slow down the UN vote [on sanctions],” Powell wrote. “This is a deceptive manipulation because, as the notes of the agents show, Mr. Flynn was not even sure he had spoken to Russia/Kislyak on the issue. He had talked to dozens of countries.”

Powell also alleged that agents added: “or if Kislyak described any Russian response to a request by Flynn.”

“That question and answer does not appear in the notes, yet it was made into a criminal offense,” Powell wrote. “The draft also shows that the agents moved a sentence to make it seem to be an answer to a question it was not.”

Powell also raised concerns about text messages between Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page days following the publication of the salacious anti-Trump dossier, which was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee through law firm Perkins Coie.

As the coverage of the dossier spread in the media, the filing said, "Strzok wrote to Page: ‘Sitting with Bill watching CNN. A TON more out…We’re discussing whether, now that this is out, we can use it as a pretext to go interview some people.’”

“In the next two weeks, there were ‘many meetings’ between Strzok and [former Deputy FBI Director Andrew] McCabe to discuss ‘whether to interview National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and if so, what interview strategies to use,’” the document continued.

Powell alleged that on Jan. 23, 2017 – the day before the FBI interviewed Flynn at the White House – “the upper echelon of the FBI met to orchestrate” strategies that would have Flynn talk “in such a way as to keep from alerting him from understanding that he was being interviewed in a criminal investigation of which he was the target.”

“In short, they planned to deceive him about the entire scenario, and keep him ‘unguarded,’” Powell claimed.

Powell went on to allege that, at former FBI Director James Comey’s direction, McCabe “personally called Flynn to pave the way for the uncounseled conversation.”

While saying "Comey and McCabe were executing their own agenda—not investigating a crime," she continued to claim the government is hiding evidence "of the original 302, other exculpatory texts, and other forms of information completely.”

Whether the combative filings will persuade the court in a case where Flynn has already pleaded guilty remains to be seen.

Prosecutors have strongly rejected claims they're hiding evidence, saying "the government has exceeded its discovery and disclosure obligations in this matter," including by providing Flynn with thousands of pages of documents.

Federal prosecutors earlier this month called the defense's filings a “fishing expedition.”

“Since the beginning of their involvement, the defendant’s new counsel, have sought to get the charges dropped, professed their client’s actual innocence, and perpetuated conspiracy theories, all while stating that the defendant does not intend to withdraw his guilty plea,” they wrote.

But Powell is also hammering the FBI and DOJ over media leaks, citing a text message from Strzok to Page in April 2017: “I had literally just gone to find this phone to tell you I want to talk to you about media leak strategy with DOJ before you go.”

Powell also referenced a purported conversation between former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Washington Post reporter David Ignatius, claiming Clapper told the reporter “words to the effect of 'take the kill shot on Flynn,'” after he reportedly obtained the transcript of Flynn’s phone calls.

A spokesman for Clapper, though, told Fox News that he "absolutely did not say those words to David Ignatius."

"It's absolutely false," the spokesman said. "It's absurd."

Ignatius did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.

Powell also claims that the official who leaked the transcripts of the calls to Ignatius was a Pentagon official who was Stefan Halper’s “handler.”

Halper, an American professor, has been widely reported as a confidential source for the FBI during the bureau’s original investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Halper, in 2016, contacted several members of the Trump campaign including former foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos and former aides Carter Page and Sam Clovis.

“The evidence the defense requests will eviscerate any factual basis for the plea and reveal the conduct so outrageous—if there is not enough already—to mandate dismissal of this prosecution for egregious government misconduct,” Powell wrote.

Also in the filing, Powell referenced U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, who accepted Flynn’s guilty plea just days before he was “suddenly and inexplicably recused.”

Fox News reported last year that Contreras and Strzok had a personal relationship, according to text messages obtained.

“The government knew that well in advance of Mr. Flynn’s plea that Judge Contreras was a friend of Peter Strzok and his recusal was even discussed in an exchange of multiple texts,” Powell wrote, referencing text messages between Strzok and Page where they discussed Strzok and Contreras speaking “in detail” on anything “meaningful enough to warrant recusal.”

Representatives for Strzok and Page did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.

Powell’s filing is just the latest in a series of motions brought to the court on behalf of Flynn. Last week, Powell demanded federal prosecutors turn over two cellphones used by Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud, whose role in the Trump-Russia investigation has long been shrouded in mystery.

Powell’s defense of Flynn has caused an escalating battle with the government, with Flynn’s sentencing still up in the air for his guilty plea. The government said in late August that the case was ready for sentencing, after months of delay. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan has set a Dec. 18 sentencing date, though it’s unclear whether it could be pushed off again.

FBI agents manipulated Flynn file, as Clapper allegedly urged ‘kill shot’: court filing

Hmmmmmmm...............

 

[MarathonMike]

General Flynn's finances should be restored directly from Comey and Stzrok's personal funds.

 

[Nostra]

General Flynn's finances should be restored directly from Comey and Stzrok's personal funds.

I like that idea.

No doubt once this is thrown out Flynn will sue a bunch of the conspirators.

 

[Ridgerunner]

General Flynn's finances should be restored directly from Comey and Stzrok's personal funds.

I like that idea.

No doubt once this is thrown out Flynn will sue a bunch of the conspirators.

I have said this more than once... The man's (Gen. Flynn's) face should be carved on Mt Rushmore...

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Do yourself a favor and watch this Jimmy Dore video if you want a complete deconstruction of the corrupt
FBI's case against General Flynn! Aaron Mate' of Push Back, a treasure trove of information is included!
EVERYTHING WILL BECOME CRYSTAL CLEAR!

Dore is a progressive and I don't agree with his overall politics but he hates DNC corpratist snakes like Pelosi
and Schummer and he is very honest about the campaign to railroad Trump out of office
I know there are several posters here still dragging that Russian collusion dead horse around and if you
want the facts to counter such tiresome bullshit you must see the video! I promise you.