GDP +3.9%

[SteadyMercury]

so are you saying that 12% unemployment, fewer full time jobs, and declining income means we are on right track and nation has it backwards?

Unemployment is 5.7%

Full time workers
January 2009: 115,818,000
October 2014: 119,632,000
Source: data.bls.gov/timeseries/
LNS12500000

You see why we say EdwardBaiamonte is slow? He has failed at everything in life because he lacks the IQ, that is why we say EdBaiamonte is slow, so very very slow.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

so are you saying that 12% unemployment, fewer full time jobs, and declining income means we are on right track and nation has it backwards?

Unemployment is 5.7%

Full time workers
January 2009: 115,818,000
October 2014: 119,632,000
Source: data.bls.gov/timeseries/
LNS12500000

You see why we say EdwardBaiamonte is slow? He has failed at everything in life because he lacks the IQ, that is why we say EdBaiamonte is slow, so very very slow.

dear, jobs are adjusted for population growth which was around 20 million as I recall. See why we say slow?

 

[SteadyMercury]

dear, jobs are adjusted for population growth which was around 20 million as I recall. See why we say slow?

dear, after getting caught in yet another lie EdwardBaiamonte is now adding adjustments for popuation growth.

So you see EdwardBaiamonte has lied about unemployment rate before the recession, lied about it after the recession, and lied about there being fewer full time jobs now.

See why we say slow? EdwardBaiamonte is a compulsive liar because he lacks the IQ to argue with actual facts.

 

[SteadyMercury]

around 20 million as I recall.

This is as good a guarantee as you can get that it wasn't 20 million. If the compulsive liar says it, it is going to be a different number.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

around 20 million as I recall.

This is as good a guarantee as you can get that it wasn't 20 million. If the compulsive liar says it, it is going to be a different number.

population growth was about 20 million and full time job growth was about 4 million under Obama. Its is worst economic performance since Great Depression. Were it not for Great Depression Obama would have worst economy in American History!! Our two biggest liberals Obama and FDR share the worst title.

Do you understand now?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear, jobs are adjusted for population growth which was around 20 million as I recall. See why we say slow?

dear, after getting caught in yet another lie EdwardBaiamonte is now adding adjustments for popuation growth.

So you see EdwardBaiamonte has lied about unemployment rate before the recession, lied about it after the recession, and lied about there being fewer full time jobs now.

See why we say slow? EdwardBaiamonte is a compulsive liar because he lacks the IQ to argue with actual facts.

so are you saying that 12% unemployment, fewer full time jobs, and declining income means we are on right track and nation has it backwards?

 

[SteadyMercury]

so are you saying that 12% unemployment, fewer full time jobs, and declining income means we are on right track and nation has it backwards?

This is how a compulsive liar works, he's so used to making shit up he doesn't even realize he's doing it, despite being called out on these exact claims over and over.

Fewer full time jobs?

Full time workers
January 2009: 115,818,000
October 2014: 119,632,000
Source: data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12500000

12% unemployment?

U-6 unemployment = 11.5%

Do you see why we say EdwardBaiamonte lacks the IQ? He lies and lies, this is why he's a failure in life. This is why we say EdwardBaiamonte is slow, so very slow.

Do you understand now?

 

[SteadyMercury]

population growth was about 20 million and full time job growth was about 4 million under Obama

Population here: US Population by Month

January 2009 = 305.52 million
Current US population = 319 million

Another day, another lie by EdwardBaiamonte. I don't think someone could say incorrect numbers as often as EdBaiamonte even if they tried, he is a compulsive liar and this is why he is a lonely divorced 61 year old bitter man.

Do you understand now?

 

[SteadyMercury]

Pathetic EdwardBaiamonte can't even keep his own lies straight.

we have fewer full time jobs than when Barry too over.

full time job growth was about 4 million under Obama.

Fewer jobs, or four million more? Do you see why we say EdwardBaiamonte is a compulsive liar?

Do you understand now?

 

[pinqy]

so are you saying that 12% unemployment, fewer full time jobs, and declining income means we are on right track and nation has it backwards?

Unemployment is 5.7%

Full time workers
January 2009: 115,818,000
October 2014: 119,632,000
Source: data.bls.gov/timeseries/
LNS12500000

You see why we say EdwardBaiamonte is slow? He has failed at everything in life because he lacks the IQ, that is why we say EdBaiamonte is slow, so very very slow.

dear, jobs are adjusted for population growth which was around 20 million as I recall. See why we say slow?

No they are not, where on earth did you get that idea?

 

[pinqy]

population growth was about 20 million and full time job growth was about 4 million under Obama

Population here: US Population by Month

January 2009 = 305.52 million
Current US population = 319 million

Another day, another lie by EdwardBaiamonte. I don't think someone could say incorrect numbers as often as EdBaiamonte even if they tried, he is a compulsive liar and this is why he is a lonely divorced 61 year old bitter man.

Do you understand now?

You're using the wrong population. For labor force data we use the adult civilian non-institutional population, not total population Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

 

[william the wie]

population growth was about 20 million and full time job growth was about 4 million under Obama

Population here: US Population by Month

January 2009 = 305.52 million
Current US population = 319 million

Another day, another lie by EdwardBaiamonte. I don't think someone could say incorrect numbers as often as EdBaiamonte even if they tried, he is a compulsive liar and this is why he is a lonely divorced 61 year old bitter man.

Do you understand now?

You're using the wrong population. For labor force data we use the adult civilian non-institutional population, not total population Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Sanity check SM and pinqy.

UE claims increasing while GDP growthrate increases isn't that the definition of Dutch Disease and isn't that what we are experiencing?

 

[pinqy]

population growth was about 20 million and full time job growth was about 4 million under Obama

Population here: US Population by Month

January 2009 = 305.52 million
Current US population = 319 million

Another day, another lie by EdwardBaiamonte. I don't think someone could say incorrect numbers as often as EdBaiamonte even if they tried, he is a compulsive liar and this is why he is a lonely divorced 61 year old bitter man.

Do you understand now?

You're using the wrong population. For labor force data we use the adult civilian non-institutional population, not total population Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Sanity check SM and pinqy.

UE claims increasing while GDP growthrate increases isn't that the definition of Dutch Disease and isn't that what we are experiencing?

No. Unemployment insurance claims have been going down.
FRED Continued Claims Insured Unemployment

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

population growth was about 20 million and full time job growth was about 4 million under Obama

Population here: US Population by Month

January 2009 = 305.52 million
Current US population = 319 million

Another day, another lie by EdwardBaiamonte. I don't think someone could say incorrect numbers as often as EdBaiamonte even if they tried, he is a compulsive liar and this is why he is a lonely divorced 61 year old bitter man.

Do you understand now?

You're using the wrong population. For labor force data we use the adult civilian non-institutional population, not total population Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Sanity check SM and pinqy.

UE claims increasing while GDP growthrate increases isn't that the definition of Dutch Disease and isn't that what we are experiencing?

No. Unemployment insurance claims have been going down.
FRED Continued Claims Insured Unemployment

most importantly, this is worst recovery in American History (except for Great Depression) with fewer full time jobs, declining income, and U6 (unemployment) about 50% higher than before recession. Imagine how bad things would be without Republicans preventing further damage.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

so are you saying that 12% unemployment, fewer full time jobs, and declining income means we are on right track and nation has it backwards?

Unemployment is 5.7%

Full time workers
January 2009: 115,818,000
October 2014: 119,632,000
Source: data.bls.gov/timeseries/
LNS12500000

You see why we say EdwardBaiamonte is slow? He has failed at everything in life because he lacks the IQ, that is why we say EdBaiamonte is slow, so very very slow.

dear, jobs are adjusted for population growth which was around 20 million as I recall. See why we say slow?

No they are not, where on earth did you get that idea?

Since mid-2007 the U.S. population has grown by 17.2 million, according to the Census Bureau, but we have 374,000 fewer jobs since a November 2007 peak and are 10 million jobs shy of where we should be. It is particularly upsetting that our current high unemployment is concentrated in the oldest and youngest workers. Older workers have been phased out as new technologies improve productivity, and young adults who lack skills are struggling to find entry-level jobs with advancement opportunities. In the process, they are losing critical time to develop workplace habits, contacts and new skills.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/mort...-time-scandal-of-part-time-america-1405291652

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Part-time jobs are no longer the domain of the young. Many are taken by adults in their prime working years—25 to 54 years of age—and many are single men and women without high-school diplomas. Why is this happening? It can't all be attributed to the unforeseen consequences of the Affordable Care Act. The longer workers have been out of a job, the more likely they are to take a part-time job to make ends meet.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/mort...-time-scandal-of-part-time-america-1405291652

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Part-time jobs are no longer the domain of the young. Many are taken by adults in their prime working years—25 to 54 years of age—and many are single men and women without high-school diplomas. Why is this happening? It can't all be attributed to the unforeseen consequences of the Affordable Care Act. The longer workers have been out of a job, the more likely they are to take a part-time job to make ends meet.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/mort...-time-scandal-of-part-time-america-1405291652

Zuckerman added a note of caution: “Most people will have the impression that the 288,000 jobs created last month were full-time” because much of the reporting “didn’t distinguish between new part-time jobs and full-time jobs.”

In fact, the number of full-time jobs in June dropped by 523,000, reported the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while part-time jobs increased by 799,000.

Placing the news about the 523,000 decline in full-time employment in June in a non-headline position, the “288,000 jobs created” headlines produced a false picture of a strong and continuing economic recovery.

In contrast, news reports headlining “523,000 full-time jobs lost in June” would have been more accurate and less rose-tinted.

 

[pinqy]

Part-time jobs are no longer the domain of the young. Many are taken by adults in their prime working years—25 to 54 years of age—and many are single men and women without high-school diplomas. Why is this happening? It can't all be attributed to the unforeseen consequences of the Affordable Care Act. The longer workers have been out of a job, the more likely they are to take a part-time job to make ends meet.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/mort...-time-scandal-of-part-time-america-1405291652

Zuckerman added a note of caution: “Most people will have the impression that the 288,000 jobs created last month were full-time” because much of the reporting “didn’t distinguish between new part-time jobs and full-time jobs.”

In fact, the number of full-time jobs in June dropped by 523,000, reported the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while part-time jobs increased by 799,000.

Placing the news about the 523,000 decline in full-time employment in June in a non-headline position, the “288,000 jobs created” headlines produced a false picture of a strong and continuing economic recovery.

In contrast, news reports headlining “523,000 full-time jobs lost in June” would have been more accurate and less rose-tinted.

So would it also have been more accurate to headline "671,000 full time jobs gained in September?"
June was the only month this year full time jobs went down.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Part-time jobs are no longer the domain of the young. Many are taken by adults in their prime working years—25 to 54 years of age—and many are single men and women without high-school diplomas. Why is this happening? It can't all be attributed to the unforeseen consequences of the Affordable Care Act. The longer workers have been out of a job, the more likely they are to take a part-time job to make ends meet.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/mort...-time-scandal-of-part-time-america-1405291652

Zuckerman added a note of caution: “Most people will have the impression that the 288,000 jobs created last month were full-time” because much of the reporting “didn’t distinguish between new part-time jobs and full-time jobs.”

In fact, the number of full-time jobs in June dropped by 523,000, reported the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while part-time jobs increased by 799,000.

Placing the news about the 523,000 decline in full-time employment in June in a non-headline position, the “288,000 jobs created” headlines produced a false picture of a strong and continuing economic recovery.

In contrast, news reports headlining “523,000 full-time jobs lost in June” would have been more accurate and less rose-tinted.

So would it also have been more accurate to headline "671,000 full time jobs gained in September?"
June was the only month this year full time jobs went down.

are you saying this is a good economy and we have had a good recovery??

 

[pinqy]

dear, jobs are adjusted for population growth which was around 20 million as I recall. See why we say slow?

No they are not, where on earth did you get that idea?

Since mid-2007 the U.S. population has grown by 17.2 million, according to the Census Bureau, but we have 374,000 fewer jobs since a November 2007 peak and are 10 million jobs shy of where we should be. It is particularly upsetting that our current high unemployment is concentrated in the oldest and youngest workers. Older workers have been phased out as new technologies improve productivity, and young adults who lack skills are struggling to find entry-level jobs with advancement opportunities. In the process, they are losing critical time to develop workplace habits, contacts and new skills.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/mort...-time-scandal-of-part-time-america-1405291652

That doesn't answer my question. Where did you get the idea that "jobs are adjusted for population growth"?