Gay Teacher Promotes Homosexuality to Little 3rd Graders, Says He Didn’t Care What Parents Thought

[Vigilante]

The teacher was wrong to not inform the parents, guys. Period. Any of you defending him are as wrong as those defending the flag because of Roof.

 

[Syriusly]

Not acting ' a little feminine'- but after kids raised by homophobic Nazi's like yourself called the boy 'gay'.

I can see why however, you would object to a teacher trying to address homophobic bullying.

Gay Teacher Promotes Homosexuality to Little 3rd Graders Says He Didn t Care What Parents Thought US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


RALEIGH, N.C. – After a third-grader tearfully recounted how another boy had called him "gay" during gym class, teacher Omar Currie chose to raise the issue during story time by reading his students a fable about a prince who falls in love with another prince, ending with a happily-ever-after royal wedding.

That decision in April ignited a public outcry from some parents in the rural hamlet of Efland, North Carolina, resulting in Currie's resignation this week from a job he loved. The assistant principal who loaned Currie her copy of "King & King" has also resigned, and outraged parents are pressuring administrators at the Orange County Schools to ban the book.

"When I read the story, the reaction of parents didn't come into my mind," Currie, 25, said Tuesday. "In that moment, it just seemed natural to me to read the book and have a conversation about treating people with respect. My focus then was on the child, and helping the child."

Currie knows firsthand what it is like to be bullied. Growing up gay and black in a small town in the eastern part of the state, his memories of middle school are of being a frequent target for teasing and slurs.

As a student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Currie entered a teaching fellows program with the intent of helping young people. He was first introduced to "King & King" during an education course that included strategies for introducing topics involving diversity in the classroom.

After graduation, Currie became a teacher at nearby Efland-Cheeks Elementary School. Though only about 15 miles west of Chapel Hill, a college town considered among the most liberal enclaves in the state, Efland is a socially conservative community of about 750 people where churches line the highway through town.

Within hours after reading the book to his students, Currie said he got a call from the school's principal requesting a meeting in her office for the following morning. The parents of three children soon filed written complaints to a school review committee, which twice upheld the use of the book after heated public meetings. But the school's principal also issued a new directive that teachers must submit an advance list of all books they intend to read with students to their parents.

"King & King" has been a subject of controversy before. In 2006, the parents of a Massachusetts second-grader sued after the book was read in their child's class. A federal judge later ruled against them, saying the rights of parents to exercise their religious and moral beliefs are not violated when children are exposed to differing ideas in public school.

In his two years at Efland elementary, Currie said his sexual orientation had never been an issue. His co-workers, and some parents, knew he lives with his male partner.

But at the committee meetings to discuss Currie's use of the book, some parents whose children were not in his class made their attacks personal, telling him he would die young and spend eternity in hell. He also began receiving hate-filled letters and emails, including one copied to other teachers at the school, described homosexuality as a "birth defect" while accusing Currie of trying to "indoctrinate" children through "psycho-emotional rape."

Bad faggot teacher. Good through by my kid doesn't go to that school.

You left out n*gger too.

That sounds racist...

Yep- the words f*ggot and n*gger are used for the same basic purpose by the same people- I was just reminding him he had left one out.

You're gonna get called all kinds of nasty things and possibly take a sever beating if not worse when you start messing with peoples kids.

Yep- like f*ggot and n*gger.

If you feel a need to beat a teacher for reading a book- approved by the school board- in class- then its not the teacher that has the problem.

 

[Jackson]

And liberals say being a homo isnt a mental illness.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The teacher was wrong to not inform the parents, guys. Period. Any of you defending him are as wrong as those defending the flag because of Roof.

I see Russia and Putin have a flag now....

Russian President Vladimir Putin's United Russia party has courted controversy by unveiling a flag celebrating heterosexual "real families" in response to the US decision to legalise gay marriage.

Homosexuality is not illegal in Russia, however the country has implemented a law since 2013 which outlaws the use of symbols which could be considered "propaganda" promoting "non traditional" values.

Putin s party unveils Russian straight pride flag

 

[Jackson]

Libs and Cons alike who are parents would have told the teacher, "bub, let us know before you do something like that."

No, that's not good enough. He had no business bringing up the topic at all. Let kids be innocent for as long as possible. At some time there will be a friend who has 2 dads or 2 moms. Let them get to know the parents involved and find that they are not the monsters some would like to claim.

You are wrong, of course. That is a legitimate subject for the teacher to bring up with the parents. If they disagreed, they had legitimate ways to stop him from doing that. You are not a parent in that class. End of story.

There are some topics that plainly are not for educators to tackle. Homosexuality is one. Let's stick to reading, writing and 'rithmetic.

 

[Anathema]

If any child of mine had a teacher do that they'd see me at their home, with a shotgun; so we could have a discussion about what's appropriate in a classroom. Especially in THIRD GRADE.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Libs and Cons alike who are parents would have told the teacher, "bub, let us know before you do something like that."

No, that's not good enough. He had no business bringing up the topic at all. Let kids be innocent for as long as possible. At some time there will be a friend who has 2 dads or 2 moms. Let them get to know the parents involved and find that they are not the monsters some would like to claim.

You are wrong, of course. That is a legitimate subject for the teacher to bring up with the parents. If they disagreed, they had legitimate ways to stop him from doing that. You are not a parent in that class. End of story.

There are some topics that plainly are not for educators to tackle. Homosexuality is one. Let's stick to reading, writing and 'rithmetic.

Your opinion, then. Share it with the school administrators if you have not.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And liberals say being a homo isnt a mental illness.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

 

[bodecea]

We've OPENED the door, now the REAL PERVERSION will pour through! Thanks SCOTUS for fucking up our decades old culture!

thepcmdgazette.com ^ | july 8, 2015
A North Carolina elementary school teacher has resigned after his decision to read a gay-themed children’s book to his third-grade class led to controversy in the small town of Efland. Omar Currie said he read his students the book “King and King,” a fairy tale about two princes having a “love” encounter, after he perceived negative gay stereotyping in his class. Currie said that he was inspired to teach the little kids about two men “hooking up” because a boy in his class acted a little feminine. “When I read the story, the reaction of parents didn’t come into my mind,”Currie, 25, said...

Not acting ' a little feminine'- but after kids raised by homophobic Nazi's like yourself called the boy 'gay'.

I can see why however, you would object to a teacher trying to address homophobic bullying.

Gay Teacher Promotes Homosexuality to Little 3rd Graders Says He Didn t Care What Parents Thought US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


RALEIGH, N.C. – After a third-grader tearfully recounted how another boy had called him "gay" during gym class, teacher Omar Currie chose to raise the issue during story time by reading his students a fable about a prince who falls in love with another prince, ending with a happily-ever-after royal wedding.

That decision in April ignited a public outcry from some parents in the rural hamlet of Efland, North Carolina, resulting in Currie's resignation this week from a job he loved. The assistant principal who loaned Currie her copy of "King & King" has also resigned, and outraged parents are pressuring administrators at the Orange County Schools to ban the book.

"When I read the story, the reaction of parents didn't come into my mind," Currie, 25, said Tuesday. "In that moment, it just seemed natural to me to read the book and have a conversation about treating people with respect. My focus then was on the child, and helping the child."

Currie knows firsthand what it is like to be bullied. Growing up gay and black in a small town in the eastern part of the state, his memories of middle school are of being a frequent target for teasing and slurs.

As a student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Currie entered a teaching fellows program with the intent of helping young people. He was first introduced to "King & King" during an education course that included strategies for introducing topics involving diversity in the classroom.

After graduation, Currie became a teacher at nearby Efland-Cheeks Elementary School. Though only about 15 miles west of Chapel Hill, a college town considered among the most liberal enclaves in the state, Efland is a socially conservative community of about 750 people where churches line the highway through town.

Within hours after reading the book to his students, Currie said he got a call from the school's principal requesting a meeting in her office for the following morning. The parents of three children soon filed written complaints to a school review committee, which twice upheld the use of the book after heated public meetings. But the school's principal also issued a new directive that teachers must submit an advance list of all books they intend to read with students to their parents.

"King & King" has been a subject of controversy before. In 2006, the parents of a Massachusetts second-grader sued after the book was read in their child's class. A federal judge later ruled against them, saying the rights of parents to exercise their religious and moral beliefs are not violated when children are exposed to differing ideas in public school.

In his two years at Efland elementary, Currie said his sexual orientation had never been an issue. His co-workers, and some parents, knew he lives with his male partner.

But at the committee meetings to discuss Currie's use of the book, some parents whose children were not in his class made their attacks personal, telling him he would die young and spend eternity in hell. He also began receiving hate-filled letters and emails, including one copied to other teachers at the school, described homosexuality as a "birth defect" while accusing Currie of trying to "indoctrinate" children through "psycho-emotional rape."

He's better off not working as a teacher in North Carolina. Seriously. They are treated like crap there.

 

[bodecea]

The first time some homo teacher reads our children a book like that will be the last time.

As a parent, I would have been pissed. How do you unring a bell? Let the kids be kids. Hope he finds another means of a career.

Hell would have no fury like I would have if a teacher read a book like that to our children. I swear on all that is Holy.

Yeah...you're real tough.

 

[koshergrl]

And liberals say being a homo isnt a mental illness.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

For many homos, kids are a sexual preference.

And liberals say being a homo isnt a mental illness.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

And therefore perfect teacher material, according to our current education system.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Given what is going on in public schools I can't see our children ever attending one. It's just not worth the risk

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

We've OPENED the door, now the REAL PERVERSION will pour through! Thanks SCOTUS for fucking up our decades old culture!

thepcmdgazette.com ^ | july 8, 2015
A North Carolina elementary school teacher has resigned after his decision to read a gay-themed children’s book to his third-grade class led to controversy in the small town of Efland. Omar Currie said he read his students the book “King and King,” a fairy tale about two princes having a “love” encounter, after he perceived negative gay stereotyping in his class. Currie said that he was inspired to teach the little kids about two men “hooking up” because a boy in his class acted a little feminine. “When I read the story, the reaction of parents didn’t come into my mind,”Currie, 25, said...

Not acting ' a little feminine'- but after kids raised by homophobic Nazi's like yourself called the boy 'gay'.

I can see why however, you would object to a teacher trying to address homophobic bullying.

Gay Teacher Promotes Homosexuality to Little 3rd Graders Says He Didn t Care What Parents Thought US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


RALEIGH, N.C. – After a third-grader tearfully recounted how another boy had called him "gay" during gym class, teacher Omar Currie chose to raise the issue during story time by reading his students a fable about a prince who falls in love with another prince, ending with a happily-ever-after royal wedding.

That decision in April ignited a public outcry from some parents in the rural hamlet of Efland, North Carolina, resulting in Currie's resignation this week from a job he loved. The assistant principal who loaned Currie her copy of "King & King" has also resigned, and outraged parents are pressuring administrators at the Orange County Schools to ban the book.

"When I read the story, the reaction of parents didn't come into my mind," Currie, 25, said Tuesday. "In that moment, it just seemed natural to me to read the book and have a conversation about treating people with respect. My focus then was on the child, and helping the child."

Currie knows firsthand what it is like to be bullied. Growing up gay and black in a small town in the eastern part of the state, his memories of middle school are of being a frequent target for teasing and slurs.

As a student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Currie entered a teaching fellows program with the intent of helping young people. He was first introduced to "King & King" during an education course that included strategies for introducing topics involving diversity in the classroom.

After graduation, Currie became a teacher at nearby Efland-Cheeks Elementary School. Though only about 15 miles west of Chapel Hill, a college town considered among the most liberal enclaves in the state, Efland is a socially conservative community of about 750 people where churches line the highway through town.

Within hours after reading the book to his students, Currie said he got a call from the school's principal requesting a meeting in her office for the following morning. The parents of three children soon filed written complaints to a school review committee, which twice upheld the use of the book after heated public meetings. But the school's principal also issued a new directive that teachers must submit an advance list of all books they intend to read with students to their parents.

"King & King" has been a subject of controversy before. In 2006, the parents of a Massachusetts second-grader sued after the book was read in their child's class. A federal judge later ruled against them, saying the rights of parents to exercise their religious and moral beliefs are not violated when children are exposed to differing ideas in public school.

In his two years at Efland elementary, Currie said his sexual orientation had never been an issue. His co-workers, and some parents, knew he lives with his male partner.

But at the committee meetings to discuss Currie's use of the book, some parents whose children were not in his class made their attacks personal, telling him he would die young and spend eternity in hell. He also began receiving hate-filled letters and emails, including one copied to other teachers at the school, described homosexuality as a "birth defect" while accusing Currie of trying to "indoctrinate" children through "psycho-emotional rape."

He's better off not working as a teacher in North Carolina. Seriously. They are treated like crap there.

I know for certain southerners would rather he work up north.

 

[Jackson]

And liberals say being a homo isnt a mental illness.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

And liberals say being a homo isnt a mental illness.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

The book never included the acts necessary to be considered gay. It talked about accepting two people of the same sex being together. It was about acceptance rather than what it takes to be "gay."

 

[Jackson]

Given what is going on in public schools I can't see our children ever attending one. It's just not worth the risk

I would agree SIL.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And liberals say being a homo isnt a mental illness.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

And liberals say being a homo isnt a mental illness.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

The book never included the acts necessary to be considered gay. It talked about accepting two people of the same sex being together. It was about acceptance rather than what it takes to be "gay."

How in the hell did you get that from my post?
Not that a teacher has a right to talk about homos to third graders under any circumstances.

 

[Jackson]

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

I don't know what it is and I'm not going to judge others' sexual preference. But keep the kids out of it.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

The book never included the acts necessary to be considered gay. It talked about accepting two people of the same sex being together. It was about acceptance rather than what it takes to be "gay."

How in the hell did you get that from my post?
Not that a teacher has a right to talk about homos to third graders under any circumstances.

I agree with you about never allowing a teacher (in elementary school) talk about homosexuals under any circumstances. But to be fair, this teacher was not "teaching the kids to be homosexual" as you claim.

 

[bodecea]

Not acting ' a little feminine'- but after kids raised by homophobic Nazi's like yourself called the boy 'gay'.

I can see why however, you would object to a teacher trying to address homophobic bullying.

Gay Teacher Promotes Homosexuality to Little 3rd Graders Says He Didn t Care What Parents Thought US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum


RALEIGH, N.C. – After a third-grader tearfully recounted how another boy had called him "gay" during gym class, teacher Omar Currie chose to raise the issue during story time by reading his students a fable about a prince who falls in love with another prince, ending with a happily-ever-after royal wedding.

That decision in April ignited a public outcry from some parents in the rural hamlet of Efland, North Carolina, resulting in Currie's resignation this week from a job he loved. The assistant principal who loaned Currie her copy of "King & King" has also resigned, and outraged parents are pressuring administrators at the Orange County Schools to ban the book.

"When I read the story, the reaction of parents didn't come into my mind," Currie, 25, said Tuesday. "In that moment, it just seemed natural to me to read the book and have a conversation about treating people with respect. My focus then was on the child, and helping the child."

Currie knows firsthand what it is like to be bullied. Growing up gay and black in a small town in the eastern part of the state, his memories of middle school are of being a frequent target for teasing and slurs.

As a student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Currie entered a teaching fellows program with the intent of helping young people. He was first introduced to "King & King" during an education course that included strategies for introducing topics involving diversity in the classroom.

After graduation, Currie became a teacher at nearby Efland-Cheeks Elementary School. Though only about 15 miles west of Chapel Hill, a college town considered among the most liberal enclaves in the state, Efland is a socially conservative community of about 750 people where churches line the highway through town.

Within hours after reading the book to his students, Currie said he got a call from the school's principal requesting a meeting in her office for the following morning. The parents of three children soon filed written complaints to a school review committee, which twice upheld the use of the book after heated public meetings. But the school's principal also issued a new directive that teachers must submit an advance list of all books they intend to read with students to their parents.

"King & King" has been a subject of controversy before. In 2006, the parents of a Massachusetts second-grader sued after the book was read in their child's class. A federal judge later ruled against them, saying the rights of parents to exercise their religious and moral beliefs are not violated when children are exposed to differing ideas in public school.

In his two years at Efland elementary, Currie said his sexual orientation had never been an issue. His co-workers, and some parents, knew he lives with his male partner.

But at the committee meetings to discuss Currie's use of the book, some parents whose children were not in his class made their attacks personal, telling him he would die young and spend eternity in hell. He also began receiving hate-filled letters and emails, including one copied to other teachers at the school, described homosexuality as a "birth defect" while accusing Currie of trying to "indoctrinate" children through "psycho-emotional rape."

Bad faggot teacher. Good through by my kid doesn't go to that school.

You left out n*gger too.

That sounds racist...

Yep- the words f*ggot and n*gger are used for the same basic purpose by the same people- I was just reminding him he had left one out.

You're gonna get called all kinds of nasty things and possibly take a sever beating if not worse when you start messing with peoples kids.

How about the bullied kid? I guess that was ok?

 

[Jackson]

Bad faggot teacher. Good through by my kid doesn't go to that school.

You left out n*gger too.

That sounds racist...

Yep- the words f*ggot and n*gger are used for the same basic purpose by the same people- I was just reminding him he had left one out.

You're gonna get called all kinds of nasty things and possibly take a sever beating if not worse when you start messing with peoples kids.

How about the bullied kid? I guess that was ok?

A teacher could have discussed bullying without bringing up the gay reference.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

Teaching kids about being a homo and never considering that the parents might take offense makes you a nutjob.

Claiming the teacher was wrong makes me a nut job? He wasn't "teaching the kids to be homo." Look in the mirror and get some comprehension lessons.

Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong suit. Go back and read it again.

The book never included the acts necessary to be considered gay. It talked about accepting two people of the same sex being together. It was about acceptance rather than what it takes to be "gay."

How in the hell did you get that from my post?
Not that a teacher has a right to talk about homos to third graders under any circumstances.

I agree with you about never allowing a teacher (in elementary school) talk about homosexuals under any circumstances. But to be fair, this teacher was not "teaching the kids to be homosexual" as you claim.

I'm gonna have to go back to that reading comprehension thing.
Nowhere did I say the teacher was teaching them to be homos.
I said teaching them "about" being a homo,not how to be a homo.