Gay Couple Says Waitress Told Them 'We Don't Serve Fags Here'

[Kondor3]

Big Earl did nothing wrong. The waitress never really said that they didn't serve fags. That was made up. What she did say was "we don't like fags here". The couple can go back every day. They will be served and possibly told they aren't liked. Their rights are not violated since there is no right to be liked.

Hmmmmm... great point !

Methinks there's a very useful tactic embedded somewhere in that idea...

 

[bodecea]

Odd...I was just called a member of the KKK today.

Someone actually had the balls to approach you?
I've seen you.
You're ******* hideous.

Sorry, it is impossible for you to have "seen me". I've never provided you with a picture of myself.

 

[Darkwind]

You want to force people to behave to YOUR definition of "normal behavior"?

genetics force us, we have nothing to do with it

We were meant to replicate, or the species dies.

Your kind is of zero relevance to the continuation of the human race.

Now, why do you feel compelled to force your obsessive compulsion on us?

You only have your weak minded self to blame for your irrational behavior.

No, not everyone was meant to reproduce...which is why a portion of the population is gay. If everyone reproduced, we'd be overpopulated and would deplete all our resources.

Idiot.

Well, no; that's not true either.

If you are a believer in evolution, then you will know that nature moves down many paths of adaptation. A vast majority of them fail.

Homosexuality is just another path of evolution. It would be a blind path if it became prevalent, but clearly, a significant minority of any given species that has this trait is so small as to not pose a real risk.

The same can be said with many birth defects. Before our medical knowledge and technology advanced to the degree we have today, many malformed and obvious defects would ensure that the defect did not procreate and thereby, cause a threat to the species. Today, we don't allow the people who have been born with bad genes to just die off. This is not a moral stance, but one made often in nature.

Homosexuality does not threaten us as a species anymore given the current population. However, it cannot ever be said that homosexuality is a normal thing in nature. Clearly, it is not.

 

[Pop23]

You want to force people to behave to YOUR definition of "normal behavior"?

genetics force us, we have nothing to do with it

We were meant to replicate, or the species dies.

Your kind is of zero relevance to the continuation of the human race.

Now, why do you feel compelled to force your obsessive compulsion on us?

You only have your weak minded self to blame for your irrational behavior.

No, not everyone was meant to reproduce...which is why a portion of the population is gay. If everyone reproduced, we'd be overpopulated and would deplete all our resources.

Idiot.

Everyone was meant to dolt. Because a few are disabled does not change that fact.

You have an obsessive compulsive disorder that you and a few others refuse to deal with. Because you found some, and recruited other enablers into your delusion does not change nature.

The species exists because males couple with females and for no other reason.

Homosexuality exists for perceived pleasure only

Heterosexuality is key to human life itself

Deal with it.

 

[protectionist]

Homosexuality does not threaten us as a species anymore given the current population. However, it cannot ever be said that homosexuality is a normal thing in nature. Clearly, it is not.

Homosexuality is about as ABNORMAL as anything could ever. The body parts are created by nature for heterosexual sex. Anything else is nuts.

 

[theHawk]

News Flash: Nobody likes fags....except fags.

 

[LockeJaw]

News Flash: Nobody likes fags....except fags.

Indeed. Society's patience is wearing thin.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Sounds like my kinda restaurant (and waitress). Make reservations for me.

Indeed. Hopefully they have a drive thru.....pull up and ask if they serve fags. When the person says "yes", tell them to fry up a dozen.....

 

[Politico]

No it isn't. He is being honest about what most people think of gay PDA's. It is disgusting like two dogs humping on a table. Don't get mad about the dog comparison, since you all use male dogs humping male dogs as proof all animals are fags...therefore it's natural. Lol! It's retarded as hell to say these things...but there ya go, it's one argument I hear all to often from fags & *** enablers.

You admit your hypocrisy again. Go ahead and embrace it. Or does it shame you to be so hypocritical that you want to deny it in the face of all you've said?

Bodecea - I think that what you and your kind fail to recognize is that normal natural healthy human beings , although some may pity you ,and display random acts of kindness directed at you , view you as subhuman . Basically defective ,unwanted , pitiful cretins and perverts to be kept at arms length.

No just a minority of idiots like you think that way.

You want to force people to behave to YOUR definition of "normal behavior"?

A relationship between a man and woman is normal. I don't force anyone to do anything. Queers are abnormal but your free to get your freak on any way you choose.

Well gee...thanks.

And this is why the topic never gets resolved.

 

[GreenBean]

genetics force us, we have nothing to do with it

We were meant to replicate, or the species dies.

Your kind is of zero relevance to the continuation of the human race.

Now, why do you feel compelled to force your obsessive compulsion on us?

You only have your weak minded self to blame for your irrational behavior.

No, not everyone was meant to reproduce...which is why a portion of the population is gay. If everyone reproduced, we'd be overpopulated and would deplete all our resources.

Idiot.

Everyone was meant to dolt. Because a few are disabled does not change that fact.

You have an obsessive compulsive disorder that you and a few others refuse to deal with. Because you found some, and recruited other enablers into your delusion does not change nature.

The species exists because males couple with females and for no other reason.

Homosexuality exists for perceived pleasure only

Heterosexuality is key to human life itself

Deal with it.

Well Put Pops.
Heterosexuality is key to human life itself
Heterosexuality represents Regeneration and New Life
Homosexuality represents Degeneration and Death

 

[Seawytch]

genetics force us, we have nothing to do with it

We were meant to replicate, or the species dies.

Your kind is of zero relevance to the continuation of the human race.

Now, why do you feel compelled to force your obsessive compulsion on us?

You only have your weak minded self to blame for your irrational behavior.

No, not everyone was meant to reproduce...which is why a portion of the population is gay. If everyone reproduced, we'd be overpopulated and would deplete all our resources.

Idiot.

Well, no; that's not true either.

If you are a believer in evolution, then you will know that nature moves down many paths of adaptation. A vast majority of them fail.

Homosexuality is just another path of evolution. It would be a blind path if it became prevalent, but clearly, a significant minority of any given species that has this trait is so small as to not pose a real risk.

The same can be said with many birth defects. Before our medical knowledge and technology advanced to the degree we have today, many malformed and obvious defects would ensure that the defect did not procreate and thereby, cause a threat to the species. Today, we don't allow the people who have been born with bad genes to just die off. This is not a moral stance, but one made often in nature.

Homosexuality does not threaten us as a species anymore given the current population. However, it cannot ever be said that homosexuality is a normal thing in nature. Clearly, it is not.

Now, I am just guessing here, but I'm willing to bet money you aren't an actual scientist...

The evolutionary puzzle of homosexuality

 

[Seawytch]

News Flash: Nobody likes fags....except fags.

Indeed. Society's patience is wearing thin.

Gosh, that must be why Gallup recorded the highest approval for gay marriage...just the other day.

 

[Iceweasel]

Now, I am just guessing here, but I'm willing to bet money you aren't an actual scientist...

The evolutionary puzzle of homosexuality

I'm just guessing here, but you aren't either.

"
17 February 2014 Last updated at 19:37 ET
Share this page

Print

Share
Facebook
Twitter

The evolutionary puzzle of homosexuality
By William Kremer BBC World Service
Ultrasound scan of baby in womb
Continue reading the main story
In today's Magazine

The football fans who are saving lives
Is it possible to be a millionaire poet?
UK taught Brazil interrogation techniques
Growing up in the shadow of the mafia

In the last two decades, dozens of scientific papers have been published on the biological origins of homosexuality - another announcement was made last week. It's becoming scientific orthodoxy. But how does it fit with Darwin's theory of evolution?

Macklemore and Ryan Lewis's hit song Same Love, which has become an unofficial anthem of the pro-gay marriage campaign in the US, reflects how many gay people feel about their sexuality.

It mocks those who "think it's a decision, and you can be cured with some treatment and religion - man-made rewiring of a predisposition". A minority of gay people disagree, maintaining that sexuality is a social construct, and they have made a conscious, proud choice to take same-sex partners.

But scientific opinion is with Macklemore. Since the early 1990s, researchers have shown that homosexuality is more common in brothers and relatives on the same maternal line, and a genetic factor is taken to be the cause. Also relevant - although in no way proof - is research identifying physical differences in the brains of adult straight and gay people, and a dizzying array of homosexual behaviour in animals."

Siblings would indicate they shared a common environment, how is that evidence of a genetic cause? That's an assumption, not science. Scientific opinion isn't scientific fact. How do they explain identical twins with different sexual preferences? They obviously rule out any human subjectivity, which is odd since sexual preferences are highly subjective. Where's the gay gene? That would be proof. The dizzying array of animal homosexual means they know zilch about animals. Animals pair up with opposite genders unless they can't. The dominant male in the mammal kingdom often gets the whole harem to himself.

It's just political correctness and it isn't the only example of agendas masquerading as science.

 

[Seawytch]

Now, I am just guessing here, but I'm willing to bet money you aren't an actual scientist...

The evolutionary puzzle of homosexuality

I'm just guessing here, but you aren't either.

Oh, very good, Sherlock. You did notice where I linked to actual scientists...well done.

 

[Iceweasel]

Now, I am just guessing here, but I'm willing to bet money you aren't an actual scientist...

The evolutionary puzzle of homosexuality

I'm just guessing here, but you aren't either.

Oh, very good, Sherlock. You did notice where I linked to actual scientists...well done.

Well done Sherlock. You couldn't deal with my points so you ignored them. A hallmark of gay activists.

 

[Seawytch]

I'm just guessing here, but you aren't either.

Oh, very good, Sherlock. You did notice where I linked to actual scientists...well done.

Well done Sherlock. You couldn't deal with my points so you ignored them. A hallmark of gay activists.

You didn't make ant points, you dismissed actual scientists. A percentage of the population has always been gay and always will be gay. That is a fact. What is your "point"?

 

[GreenBean]

No, not everyone was meant to reproduce...which is why a portion of the population is gay. If everyone reproduced, we'd be overpopulated and would deplete all our resources.

Idiot.

Well, no; that's not true either.

If you are a believer in evolution, then you will know that nature moves down many paths of adaptation. A vast majority of them fail.

Homosexuality is just another path of evolution. It would be a blind path if it became prevalent, but clearly, a significant minority of any given species that has this trait is so small as to not pose a real risk.

The same can be said with many birth defects. Before our medical knowledge and technology advanced to the degree we have today, many malformed and obvious defects would ensure that the defect did not procreate and thereby, cause a threat to the species. Today, we don't allow the people who have been born with bad genes to just die off. This is not a moral stance, but one made often in nature.

Homosexuality does not threaten us as a species anymore given the current population. However, it cannot ever be said that homosexuality is a normal thing in nature. Clearly, it is not.

Now, I am just guessing here, but I'm willing to bet money you aren't an actual scientist...

The evolutionary puzzle of homosexuality

Very good link seahag, good reading. It accentuates the point that the issue of Birth over choice in regards to homosexuality is an unsettled issue. There is no Gay Gene -per Se - there is still a distinct, viable and rational argument that some Gays may actualy be born that way and are unable to control their behavior.

There is also strong proof that many are not born that way and are simply psychologically damaged. The weakes point in your argument,or that from the link you provided is the fact that "Siblings would indicate they shared a common environment, how is that evidence of a genetic cause? That's an assumption, not science. Scientific opinion isn't scientific fact." as pointed out by iceweasel.

 

[GreenBean]

Oh, very good, Sherlock. You did notice where I linked to actual scientists...well done.

Well done Sherlock. You couldn't deal with my points so you ignored them. A hallmark of gay activists.

You didn't make ant points, you dismissed actual scientists. A percentage of the population has always been gay and always will be gay. That is a fact. What is your "point"?

Now here's where you go off the wall again.
Iceweasel most certainly did make some good points -just as you most certainly did

BUT - you are guided by your agenda and you don't care if you need to alter black to be white and white to be blue to make your puzzle fit together . Give Credit where credit is due - otherwise your doomed to being the ignorant Cookie Monster /Tasmanian Devil hybrid many envision you to be.

 

[Pop23]

I'm just guessing here, but you aren't either.

Oh, very good, Sherlock. You did notice where I linked to actual scientists...well done.

Well done Sherlock. You couldn't deal with my points so you ignored them. A hallmark of gay activists.

And of the obsessive compulsive. It's why you often hear them say "why would I choose to live this way?" Cutters, hoarders, they all claim to be normal. And they all have enablers that justify their behavior.

 

[Pop23]

Oh, very good, Sherlock. You did notice where I linked to actual scientists...well done.

Well done Sherlock. You couldn't deal with my points so you ignored them. A hallmark of gay activists.

You didn't make ant points, you dismissed actual scientists. A percentage of the population has always been gay and always will be gay. That is a fact. What is your "point"?

A percentage of the population has always cut themselves, vomited after eating, eaten in excess until they way 1000 lbs.

What is your point? That these obsessive behaviors are normal ?

Get real and look in the damn mirror.