Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 94,881
- 67,300
- 3,645
What an idiotic response.Are you referring to the dozens of cop assassinations under Obama or just a few bruised egos under Trump?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What an idiotic response.Are you referring to the dozens of cop assassinations under Obama or just a few bruised egos under Trump?
It was a logical response. It was cops who killed Trump supporters on January 6, not the other way around.What an idiotic response.
You can call the hearings a garden party if you like. It doesn't change the fact that Garland was left no choice but to reluctantly name Smith SC in light of the committee's findings. Ones you are clearly unfamiliar with so......
No. Those were all MAGAts.Was he part of the J6 goon squad who beat up 130 cops?
Talk about a witch hunt with no evidence? You fuckers are nuts! Jim Jordan is a joke!Geeeeeeee, I wonder who nominated Garland to his position? But, he's not the president's lawyer. And, he's not a prosecutor. Oh, wait a minute, he IS a prosecutor.
I'm familiar with your delusional belief on the matter. Belied by the facts you studiously avoid in the committee's report. The report you won't read for fear of having to acknowledge your delusion.There were no findings -
It was a scripted infomercial.
No actual investigating.
No finding of facts.
Nothing but a show, literally choreographed and produced for TV by TV people.
I'm familiar with your delusional belief on the matter. Belied by the facts you studiously avoid in the committee's report. The report you won't read for fear of having to acknowledge your delusion.
You rock!There were no findings -
It was a scripted infomercial.
No actual investigating.
No finding of facts.
Nothing but a show, literally choreographed and produced for TV by TV people.
You rock!
He isn't the President's lawyer. He is the United States' lawyer as AG. You need to brush up on how our government works here.Geeeeeeee, I wonder who nominated Garland to his position? But, he's not the president's lawyer. And, he's not a prosecutor. Oh, wait a minute, he IS a prosecutor.
I watched that hearing this morning and it was like watching Archie and Meathead go back and forth from All in the Family. It was fuckin' funny! Jim Jordan is a joke!I'm aware.
Were you there at the Capitol on Jan 6th? Or hiding under your bed posting sternly on social media?Still spewing those lies, huh traitor?
He isn't the President's lawyer. He is the United States' lawyer as AG. You need to brush up on how our government works here.
I watched that hearing this morning and it was like watching Archie and Meathead go back and forth from All in the Family. It was fuckin' funny! Jim Jordan is a joke!
No, you are lying. He said when he testified during his confirmation hearings he promised to leave Weiss alone. Said it several times.liar.
He said very clearly multiple times that he had not and that Weiss had said as much himself in the multiple letters he has sent the committee.![]()
Update!
Yes, they are doing their best to make it appear like this.I'm not sure what specifically you refer to. But it seems to me that Garland is making a good faith effort to steer the AG's office from making political decisions.
I realize maga is pissed that Trump lost, but his Jan 6th and records liability would disappear, just as in all "scandals," if the potus just took responsibility. Nixon, WJC. Reagan used the "I can't remember" defense, which worked for him not just because that was actually believable, but because his CIA director was prepared to die. LOL
Who could have ever guessed that would happen?
He did leave Weiss alone. That’s what the Republicans are crying about. They believe Garland should have interfered more to ensure that Weiss wasn’t so “easy” on Hunter.No, you are lying. He said when he testified during his confirmation hearings he promised to leave Weiss alone. Said it several times.
In essence, he said please refer to my earlier perjury so I don’t have to commit perjury again here today.