Garland, "I am not the president's lawyer"

[Independent thinker]

As someone who spent my career in management, Garland sucks at it. He has no leadership abilities at all. Thank the lord he's not on the Supreme Court

He doesn't need leadership abilities. All he has to do is follow the Borg Collective directive.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Nope. Trigger happy cop, only one to open fire the whole day because he panicked and was covered up for by the Dems.

Nope. Silly woman besotted with Trumper follies and fallacies that led to her death.

 

[nomadic5]

Geeeeeeee, I wonder who nominated Garland to his position? But, he's not the president's lawyer. And, he's not a prosecutor. Oh, wait a minute, he IS a prosecutor.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/20/politics/garland-congress-hunter-trump/index.html

typical lib rot: say the obvious... say something no one would argue with, even though it is NOT a valid response to the issue being addressed.

We all know that he shouldn't be the president's lawyer... sheeze... a 10 yr old knows that.

But what we don't (all) know is: Is he acting as his lawyer?

But he would claim he "cannot recollect the answer to that"

(I would add LOL but it's not funny)

 

[kaz]

He doesn't need leadership abilities. All he has to do is follow the Borg Collective directive.

I doubt even the Borg would have denied they know ANYTHING about the department they are supposed to run.

Thank you GOD the man is not on the SCOTUS. And I use "man" loosely

 

[DBA]

typical lib rot: say the obvious... say something no one would argue with, even though it is NOT a valid response to the issue being addressed.

We all know that he shouldn't be the president's lawyer... sheeze... a 10 yr old knows that.

But what we don't (all) know is: Is he acting as his lawyer?

But he would claim he "cannot recollect the answer to that"

(I would add LOL but it's not funny)

Yeah, I am sure he can't recollect it. I mean that's just ridiculous.

 

[nomadic5]

Regards of Mr. Garland's protests, the undisputed fact is that he is Biden's HAND PICKED AG, who had such a partisan reputation that he didn't even rate a hearing, much less a confirmation vote for the Supreme Court when he was nominated. Not as if he would have stood a chance anyhow.

maybe I'm tired or something (got a lot on my mind) but I don't get this... Garland was not put forth as a nominee for scotus, thanks to Mitch McConnell

 

[nomadic5]

Yeah, I am sure he can't recollect it. I mean that's just ridiculous.

If he'd become a scotus Justice and the others wanted to know how he was deciding on the issue at hand, he'd say

"I don't recall the answer to that.." LOL

weird answer regardless...

 

[Independent thinker]

I doubt even the Borg would have denied they know ANYTHING about the department they are supposed to run.

Thank you GOD the man is not on the SCOTUS. And I use "man" loosely

Obama said Garland was a moderate choice. Yeah, right.

 

[kaz]

Obama said Garland was a moderate choice. Yeah, right.

Garland has no integrity and no male genetalia

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Garland has no integrity and no male genetalia

And neither do you, apparently. Garland, in fact, was a great pick. He has let Jack Smith run his investigation without restraint from the AG. He has restored America's confidence in the DOJ that Trump was trying to collapse. With convictions and adjudged jail sentences next year, confidence will be restored as the elections begin.

 

[Polishprince]

maybe I'm tired or something (got a lot on my mind) but I don't get this... Garland was not put forth as a nominee for scotus, thanks to Mitch McConnell

Sen. McConnell was just obeying the Biden Rule, which prohibits Supreme Court nominees from being voted on during election years.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No, he was not.

 

[nomadic5]

Garland has no integrity and no male genetalia

LOL

I'm not going to ask you how you know that...

 

[nomadic5]

Sen. McConnell was just obeying the Biden Rule, which prohibits Supreme Court nominees from being voted on during election years.

He didn't have to go by that rule

I'm glad he didn't. Maybe once this admin is gone, we'll have a true American there doing justice, not playing favorites

 

[DBA]

He has restored America's confidence in the DOJ

Boy are you misniformed.

Garland is a partisan hack. The man is either REALLY stupid or lying under oath about not knowing basically anything. Most of us know he isn’t stupid and realize the latter is the case. The trust in the DOJ is at an all time low.

 

[forkup]

Boy are you misniformed.

Garland is a partisan hack. The man is either REALLY stupid or lying under oath about not knowing basically anything. Most of us know he isn’t stupid and realize the latter is the case. The trust in the DOJ is at an all time low.

The object of an independent AG is that he doesn't get involved with ongoing investigations as a rule. Doubly so when their can be a perception of bias. It's what he said he would do in regards to the Hunter Biden investigation during his conformation hearing.

It's also what you guys are denying happened.

On the other hand, if as a result of this. If the AG doesn't have specific information on that investigation he's a liar, because in your view it's unlikely that Garland did what he said he'd do.

Just out of curiosity. Does an AG have the right to put his hand on the scale of justice or should he stay as far away as possible?

 

[DBA]

The object of an independent AG is that he doesn't get involved with ongoing investigations as a rule. Doubly so when their can be a perception of bias. It's what he said he would do in regards to the Hunter Biden investigation during his conformation hearing.

It's also what you guys are denying happened.

On the other hand, if as a result of this. If the AG doesn't have specific information on that investigation he's a liar, because in your view it's unlikely that Garland did what he said he'd do.

Just out of curiosity. Does an AG have the right to put his hand on the scale of justice or should he stay as far away as possible?

He said he didn’t recall if he had any contact with anyone at the FBI regarding the Hunter Biden investigation. What a load of crap. It is the single biggest thing going on, is all over the news, and he doesn’t recall. The US attorney in DC refused to allow Weiss to pursue Hunter on tax fraud. According to Garland, Weiss had full authority to do as he pleased regarding the case. Somebody is lying.

 

[forkup]

He said he didn’t recall if he had any contact with anyone at the FBI regarding the Hunter Biden investigation. What a load of crap. It is the single biggest thing going on, is all over the news, and he doesn’t recall. The US attorney in DC refused to allow Weiss to pursue Hunter on tax fraud. According to Garland, Weiss had full authority to do as he pleased regarding the case. Somebody is lying.

Garland has taken his hands of the investigation. Nothing in his testimony is inconsistent with that premise.

I personally find it hilarious that that is now used against him. It just shows how conformation bias works.

 

[berg80]

As someone who spent my career in management, Garland sucks at it. He has no leadership abilities at all. Thank the lord he's not on the Supreme Court

Hmmmmmmm. So making a claim you have no knowledge is your way of justifying McTreason's unprecedented, unforgiveable act of treachery. Got it.

 

[Marener]

He said he didn’t recall if he had any contact with anyone at the FBI regarding the Hunter Biden investigation. What a load of crap. It is the single biggest thing going on, is all over the news, and he doesn’t recall. The US attorney in DC refused to allow Weiss to pursue Hunter on tax fraud. According to Garland, Weiss had full authority to do as he pleased regarding the case. Somebody is lying.

You actually think the Hunter Biden case is the single biggest thing going on in the DoJ?