Gabbard is DNI

Where Are Biden's 81 Million Votes? Jordan Crushes CNN 'Gotcha' Question...​


image%20%2829%29_8.png


The Big Steal​






Less people voted across the nation, what don't you get dummy?

In 2020 we were in a pandemic with people locked up at home and less to do, so it's reasonable for more people to end up voting in that year.


The suggestion that Democrats were cheating in 2020 to win California or New York, which have seen lower turnout in 2024 is incredibly fucking stupid.
 
Last edited:
So when Tulsi Gabbard was on stage with Biden and Kamala in 2020 at the DNC debates, and Tulsi was still debating after Kamala went down, how can Tulsi be a Russian asset now and not then? Democrats want to elect Russian assets? REALLY?
 
So when Tulsi Gabbard was on stage with Biden and Kamala in 2020 at the DNC debates, and Tulsi was still debating after Kamala went down, how can Tulsi be a Russian asset now and not then? Democrats want to elect Russian assets? REALLY?
see here back in 2019. -->

Gabbard has always been something of an outlier in the party and in the Democratic presidential field. After special counsel Robert Mueller released his report, detailing ten instances of alleged obstruction of justice by President Donald Trump but saying there was not enough evidence to show a conspiracy, Gabbard issued a statement that defended the president. Using words Trump employs, Gabbard said the report found "no collusion," and that the country should just move on from the issue.
 
see here back in 2019. -->
Gabbard has always been something of an outlier in the party and in the Democratic presidential field. After special counsel Robert Mueller released his report, detailing ten instances of alleged obstruction of justice by President Donald Trump but saying there was not enough evidence to show a conspiracy, Gabbard issued a statement that defended the president. Using words Trump employs, Gabbard said the report found "no collusion," and that the country should just move on from the issue.
Point remains that Tulsi was on the PRESIDENTIAL debate stage with Biden and Harris.
Was she a Russian asset then or not? There was no mention of Russia that I recall, so we know its total bullshit now.
No indictment means that the "talking point" is dead.
Tulsi was right "innocent until proven guilty" means exactly that.
 
Point remains that Tulsi was on the PRESIDENTIAL debate stage with Biden and Harris.
Was she a Russian asset then or not? There was no mention of Russia that I recall, so we know its total bullshit now.
No indictment means that the "talking point" is dead.
Tulsi was right "innocent until proven guilty" means exactly that.
this falls under the topic of security clearances.

This exists to preserve national security.
Those persons who pass the security clearance check are permitted access to secrets.
But if a person doesnt pass the security check, it doesnt mean they are criminal. It just means they should have access to our secrets.
 
this falls under the topic of security clearances.

This exists to preserve national security.
Those persons who pass the security clearance check are permitted access to secrets.
But if a person doesnt pass the security check, it doesnt mean they are criminal. It just means they should have access to our secrets.
OK. Can we agree that if the FBI says that Tulsi is a security risk, that she shouldn't be confirmed?

But, if she passes the FBI security clearance check, that. the MSM needs to STFU about her loyalty.
 
OK. Can we agree that if the FBI says that Tulsi is a security risk, that she shouldn't be confirmed?

But, if she passes the FBI security clearance check, that. the MSM needs to STFU about her loyalty.
perhaps at lower levels of security clearance, the FBI does it. but the director of national intelligence gets to see everything, so it would likely be a top secret clearance. The agency that does that is Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency
 
Tulsi can't be happy about the renewed scrutiny of her comments regarding whether Assad was responsible for using chemical weapons on his people the fall of Assad's regime will bring. Only she knows why she questioned Assad's responsibility, and went on to criticize trump over his missile strikes in Syria following the chemical weapons attacks.
Assad must have enjoyed the support he got from a member of the US House of Reps. Especially how she claimed Syria was not an enemy of the US despite Assad's alliance with Putin. No doubt she is already preparing to spin her comments in getting ready for her confirmation hearing.
 
Why are you making threads that are just you throwing temper tantrums about the news?

Why is she a supposedly bad pick? This is why you lack credibility. You just whine
You mean besides lacking executive experience running multiple agencies like the ones under the DNI umbrella and a lack of experience inside the intel community and her remarks in defense of Assad over his use of chemical weapons and her belief in this horseshit..........

Gabbard’s sympathetic views toward Russia cause alarm as Trump’s pick to lead intelligence services​

 
You mean besides lacking executive experience running multiple agencies like the ones under the DNI umbrella and a lack of experience inside the intel community and her remarks in defense of Assad over his use of chemical weapons and her belief in this horseshit..........

Gabbard’s sympathetic views toward Russia cause alarm as Trump’s pick to lead intelligence services​

Since when has lacking direct experience been a disqualified in recent context?

Hell, your loser party had an Indiana mayor head up transportation .. and put an aloof VP as border czar…

NOW you’re going to demand high standards of on-paper qualifications?

LMAO
 
Since when has lacking direct experience been a disqualified in recent context?

Hell, your loser party had an Indiana mayor head up transportation .. and put an aloof VP as border czar…

NOW you’re going to demand high standards of on-paper qualifications?

LMAO
The complexities of running our entire intel service calls for someone who is more than a political ally of trump's. It's not a position for on the job training. Unless the goal really isn't the defense of the nation. But rather trying to equal the score with those who Baby Donald thinks has done him harm.
 
The complexities of running our entire intel service calls for someone who is more than a political ally of trump's. It's not a position for on the job training. Unless the goal really isn't the defense of the nation.
Did Biden hire someone apolitical and someone who wasn’t his ally? I mean, you’re hilarious with your double standards
But rather trying to equal the score with those who Baby Donald thinks has done him harm.
Your emotional responses are very odd. You seem hung up on Trump. Are you mad your ideology got clearly rejected by the public?
 
OK. Can we agree that if the FBI says that Tulsi is a security risk, that she shouldn't be confirmed?

But, if she passes the FBI security clearance check, that. the MSM needs to STFU about her loyalty.
She has never been a security risk dumbass. You worthless leftist traitors will believe anything that you're told to.
1000000614.webp
 
Tulsi be like....she flew over the rainbow. I am delighted with and for her quite frankly.



Greg

Tulsi, like most of the criminals and con artists in MAGAt circles, simple went where the checks were.

She counts on you guys to be stupid and gullible. That's how she makes her money and gains her power.
 
Back
Top Bottom