I don’t think it is. I don however think it’s terrible to base an impeachment on parody instead of factIt's terribly disrespectful when a government official parodies other government officials.
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t think it is. I don however think it’s terrible to base an impeachment on parody instead of factIt's terribly disrespectful when a government official parodies other government officials.
![]()
This is of course, a lie. as the law does not require the President to obtain congressional approval before he acts.Trump broke the law by starting the war in Iran without Congress.
This is, of course, a lie, as the law says no such thing.Presidents can start wars by themselves ONLY if there is an IMMINENT threat to us, or have congressional authorization.
I agree but I'm 100% sure Shiff and the Dems based the impeachment on the actual transcript provided by the White House.I don’t think it is. I don however think it’s terrible to base an impeachment on parody instead of fact
Well we know that’s not true, we know he used parody. He admitted itI agree but I'm 100% sure Shiff and the Dems based the impeachment on the actual transcript provided by the White House.
Get ready for the blowback since the charge was refuted by the Senate.I agree but I'm 100% sure Shiff and the Dems based the impeachment on the actual transcript provided by the White House.
Well we know that’s not true, we know he used parody. He admitted it
The transcript itself when finally shown, showed the opposite of Shifts pardy and lead to Trump’s exoneration in the senate and public at large
You mean the charge was refuted by the REPUBLICANS in the Senate. The public is split on the issue.Get ready for the blowback since the charge was refuted by the Senate.
The public elected him againYou mean the charge was refuted by the REPUBLICANS in the Senate. The public is split on the issue.
Democrats were so stupid they impeached Trump and Republicans corrected the error.You mean the charge was refuted by the REPUBLICANS in the Senate. The public is split on the issue.
49.81% of the public elected him again.The public elected him again
The charge was dismissed because it was parody and not reality
And your point?49.81% of the public elected him again.
Like Hillary said, what difference does it make?49.81% of the public elected him again.
The law requires it to be an imminent threat, from all I've read on it, for the president to start a war without Congress.This is of course, a lie. as the law does not require the President to obtain congressional approval before he acts.
This is, of course, a lie, as the law says no such thing.
"Gabbard claims ‘coordinated effort’ by intelligence community to advance narrative to impeach Trump
Whistleblower admitted on initial form they did not have direct knowledge of Trump's private communications
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released newly declassified testimony that she alleges shows a "coordinated effort" by the intelligence community to "manufacture a conspiracy" used as the basis of President Donald Trump first impeachment.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Monday released two declassified transcripts from closed-door House Intelligence Committee hearings that Gabbard’s office says show former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson advanced as credible a whistleblower complaint based on secondhand information from an individual who had previously worked with then-Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine. Gabbard’s office argued that, based on this and other testimony, Atkinson’s actions "weaponize[d] the whistleblower process and exceed[ed] his statutory jurisdiction."
Atkinson’s investigation helped trigger the first impeachment of Trump by advancing what he deemed a "credible" whistleblower complaint regarding a July 2019 phone call between the president and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy."
![]()
Gabbard claims ‘coordinated effort’ by intelligence community to advance narrative to impeach Trump
DNI Tulsi Gabbard releases declassified testimony she says exposes a coordinated effort to manufacture a narrative behind Trump's first impeachment.www.foxnews.com
They framed Trump with heresay from a Biden man. Can you believe this?
And your point?
Trump got more voter turnout in both of his elections then Obama, more people have voted for Trump for President then any person jn history
It just serves to show how split public opinion is.Like Hillary said, what difference does it make?
What law are you even talking about?The law requires it to be an imminent threat, from all I've read on it, for the president to start a war without Congress.
Huh?It just serves to show how split public opinion is.
If the tally was so close and, if you believe Trump and the right, election results can't be trusted, maybe Trump only won due to the GOP's rampant fraud.
Not quite. All anyone has to do is read the transcript of the phone call between Trump & Zelendky to know that Trump was blackmailing Zelensky. End of story.The Ukraine and Russiagate were utter bullshit.
Ukraine: Somebody hear someone who was not in the meeting hear it from someone that Trump said something.
Russia: I asked leftists then to show these Russian ads on Facebook that interfered with the election. They can’t find the ads but insisted that Vlad was paying Facebook big money to run the ads.
Well then quote the linesNot quite. All anyone has to do is read the transcript of the phone call between Trump & Zelendky to know that Trump was blackmailing Zelensky. End of story.
Gabbard is another hack who's part of Trump's idiocracy & she's gaslighting the American people on behalf of that orange menace from Queens.
Yes."Gabbard claims ‘coordinated effort’ by intelligence community to advance narrative to impeach Trump
They framed Trump with heresay from a Biden man. Can you believe this?