Further proof global warming is a hoax!

[EMH]

I accept the scientific reality of anthropogenic climate change in the same way I accept biological evolution, and dismiss the belief that the earth was created on October 23, 4044 B.C. I also recognize that the earth is spheroidal, not flat.

I am aware that there are those who don't.

But you cannot explain the evidence, nor do you have any interest in it...

Did increasing atmospheric Co2 warm the atmosphere? According to the highly correlated satellites and balloons, the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps we have, the answer is NO.

Can you explain how Co2 melted North America and froze Greenland at the same time? NO

Can you explain a map of the Arctic today with Co2? NO

Do you have any real evidence the planet is warming? NO


Co2 does NOTHING. THAT is the TRUTH of the DATA.

Earth climate is controlled by how much ice is on Earth = ocean level, temperature, atmospheric thickness, and humidity.

How much ice Earth has is 100% about WHERE LAND IS, and LAND MOVES ....

 

[schmidlap]

For example, Gore said during a speech at the Copenhagen Climate Conference in 2009 that there was "a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years." The former vice president made similar comments at least twice before in speeches, citing research.

However, the Arctic ice cap hasn't been eliminated at any point over the last decade. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Arctic ice minimum extent, or ice coverage during the warmest month of the year, is declining at 12.6% per decade.

In addition, in his 2006 global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth," Gore predicted that the global sea level could rise as much as 20 feet "in the near future."

Al Gore has history of climate predictions, statements proven false

Former Vice President Al Gore, who warned this week that climate change was leading to "atomic bombs exploding every day," has made extreme predictions in the past.

www.foxnews.com

.

The ideological crackpots on the fringe are not preventing the global community from confronting the consequences of anthropogenic climate change. There are consequence for clinging to ignorance.

Irrationally, the deniers are promoting the mass migrations they purportedly abhor:

With at least 192 nations preparing to gather in Bonn, Germany, in June for a major climate conference, scientists at the Universities of Exeter in the UK and Nanjing in China have quantified the human cost of global warming.​

​

Their message: failing to keep temperatures in check could jeopardize the fates of 2 billion people, forcing them into intolerable circumstances. But if the global community acts quickly, it can reduce the risk by a factor of five.​

​

“There’s the potential for large-scale movements of people,” says Professor Tim Lenton, director of the Global Systems Institute at Exeter, in a conversation with this writer. “Those people who are affected are the poorer people on the planet. At higher temperatures, life becomes unbearable, affecting water, agriculture, and food. You can’t barricade yourself from climate change. There is an undeniable interconnection amongst nations.”​

​

It is easy to see how uncontrolled temperature increases would lead to extraordinary movements across borders,” says Lenton...​

​

The good news is that the corporate community is on board.​

​

Morgan Stanley MS +2.2% says that 3,152 businesses made net-zero pledges in 2022, up from 2,891 in 2021. They target emissions at their operations by deploying energy-efficient technologies and by buying cleaner fuels from third parties. They also use their financial clout to get their supply chains to take climate action.​

​

[What Is The Human Cost Of Global Warming?]​

 

[BlindBoo]

It still snows. You haven't heard that? ask the folks in California how the snow fell this year. hahahahahahahahahaa

And the arctic still has a freeze over in the fall and a break up in the spring. Do you think AGW has changed the freezing point of water? Or did you believe that stupid story from the UK? You did didn't you?

 

[Lesh]

For example, Gore said during a speech at the Copenhagen Climate Conference in 2009 that there was "a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years." The former vice president made similar comments at least twice before in speeches, citing research.

However, the Arctic ice cap hasn't been eliminated at any point over the last decade. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Arctic ice minimum extent, or ice coverage during the warmest month of the year, is declining at 12.6% per decade.

In addition, in his 2006 global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth," Gore predicted that the global sea level could rise as much as 20 feet "in the near future."

Al Gore has history of climate predictions, statements proven false

Former Vice President Al Gore, who warned this week that climate change was leading to "atomic bombs exploding every day," has made extreme predictions in the past.

www.foxnews.com

.

declining at 12.6% per decade.

That's not inconsequential

 

[BlindBoo]

For example, Gore said during a speech at the Copenhagen Climate Conference in 2009 that there was "a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years." The former vice president made similar comments at least twice before in speeches, citing research.

However, the Arctic ice cap hasn't been eliminated at any point over the last decade. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Arctic ice minimum extent, or ice coverage during the warmest month of the year, is declining at 12.6% per decade.

In addition, in his 2006 global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth," Gore predicted that the global sea level could rise as much as 20 feet "in the near future."

Al Gore has history of climate predictions, statements proven false

Former Vice President Al Gore, who warned this week that climate change was leading to "atomic bombs exploding every day," has made extreme predictions in the past.

www.foxnews.com

.

The big "if", ("might" and "could") is what you and Faux Not the News (and the alarmist who believed) forget. Al (manbearpig) Gore always qualified his alarmism in his stump speeches with a healthy portion of "IF....." If the current trend continues we might see.......(Horrible things, maybe). Al is not a scientist and most peer reviewed studies do not concur with his hyperbole. Most of them put the ice free artic event in the later half of the 21 century with worst case scenarios in the 2030's. Same thing with Greenlands' Ice sheet. They also predict that the Atlantic basin will see less hurricanes later in the century as it warms.

 

[healthmyths]

If you have convinced yourself that the over 190 nations that have signed onto the Paris Agreement have been duped into accepting falsified data and analysis contrived by an unscrupulous climatological community (that is being confirmed by demonstrable climatological consequences in recent years) while Iran, Libya, Eritrea, and Yemen champion your attitude by abstention from such a document, you sleep with strange bedfellows indeed!

Featured in the scientific data that, as apostates from the global community, Iran, Libya, Eritrea, and Yemen do not acknowledge:

• Earth’s temperature has risen by an average of 0.14° Fahrenheit (0.08° Celsius) per decade since 1880, or about 2° F in total.
  
  • The rate of warming since 1981 is more than twice as fast: 0.32° F (0.18° C) per decade.
• 2022 was the sixth-warmest year on record based on NOAA’s temperature data.
  
  • The 2022 surface temperature was 1.55 °F (0.86 °Celsius) warmer than the 20th-century average of 57.0 °F (13.9 °C) and 1.90 ˚F (1.06 ˚C) warmer than the pre-industrial period (1880-1900).
• The 10 warmest years in the historical record have all occurred since 2010.

[Climate Change: Global Temperature]

Average winter temperatures in the region typically hover around –18°C, but sometimes temperatures drop to –25°C for spans of a week or more. One northern Siberian town even saw temperatures plummet to –66°C this past January.

Why Are Siberian Temperatures Plummeting While the Arctic Warms? - Eos

The answer involves the intricacies of stratospheric circulation, which, if better represented in climate models, could help predict extreme weather events in Siberia and elsewhere.

eos.org

The number of stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present.
Only four stations, those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations… The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world’s land mass. The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.

Climategatekeeping: Siberia

Siberian temperatures are an interesting case study in CRU gatekeeping. As reported a few days ago here, in an email of Mar 31, 2004, Jones advised Climategate correspondent Michael Mann that he ha…

climateaudit.org

Global warming figure increasing by 1.7° does NOT include almost all of the world's 12.5% land mass and as a result the 1.7° increase doesn't count!

 

[schmidlap]

The big "if", ("might" and "could") is what you and Faux Not the News (and the alarmist who believed) forget. Al (manbearpig) Gore always qualified his alarmism in his stump speeches with a healthy portion of "IF....." If the current trend continues we might see.......(Horrible things, maybe). Al is not a scientist and most peer reviewed studies do not concur with his hyperbole. Most of them put the ice free artic event in the later half of the 21 century with worst case scenarios in the 2030's. Same thing with Greenlands' Ice sheet. They also predict that the Atlantic basin will see less hurricanes later in the century as it warms.

It is hardly surprising that ideologues would fixate on Al Gore, rather than science and the empirical climatological data.
I expect that even the residue of hardcore deniers will have their ranks seriously diminished over the next few year.

WMO warns greenhouse gases and El Niño to push global temps to record levels​

Over the next five years, global temperatures could reach record levels. A new report by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) warned that heat-trapping greenhouse gases and a naturally occurring El Niño event will push global temperatures between 2023 and 2027 to more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels for at least one year.​

​

A press release said that there is a 98 percent chance that “at least one of the next five years, and the five-year period as a whole, will be the warmest on record.”​

​

“A warming El Niño is expected to develop in the coming months and this will combine with human-induced climate change to push global temperatures into uncharted territory,” Professor Petteri Taalas, WMO secretary-general, said. “This will have far-reaching repercussions for health, food security, water management and the environment. We need to be prepared.”​

The report said that global temperatures will not “permanently exceed the 1.5°C level specified in the Paris Agreement which refers to long-term warming over many years, but it “will breach the 1.5°C level on a temporary basis with increasing frequency,” Taalas said. The report, which was produced by the United Kingdom’s Met Office, confirmed there is a 32 percent chance that the five-year mean will exceed the 1.5°C threshold.​

[WMO warns greenhouse gases and El Niño to push global temps to record levels | NationofChange]​

 

[EMH]

the global community from confronting the consequences of anthropogenic climate change

Tokyo actually has. The only "anthropogenic" warming ongoing on Earth now is called URBAN HEAT SINK EFFECT, which documents that urban areas warm on the surface as they grow (and convenient for any warming FRAUD, that is most of the data we have). Tokyo was the 10 degree data point of the 1 to 10 degrees of warming attributed to urban vs. neighboring undeveloped land. Tokyo mandated plants on roofs and other things, and it is no longer 10 degrees warmer.

So yeah, we can confront what man is doing but we need TRUTH to do it and we get NONE from the Co2 fraud, which is also lying about the reason for fresh water shortages globally = humans taking too much fresh water from nature, and blocking short term solutions like desalination.

The difference is that some of us care about truth and Earth, and folks like you care only about


growing government
bilking the taxpayer
taking away people's rights
screaming fear and hate while completely lying

 

[schmidlap]

Tokyo actually has. The only "anthropogenic" warming ongoing on Earth now is called URBAN HEAT SINK EFFECT, which documents that urban areas warm on the surface as they grow (and convenient for any warming FRAUD, that is most of the data we have). Tokyo was the 10 degree data point of the 1 to 10 degrees of warming attributed to urban vs. neighboring undeveloped land. Tokyo mandated plants on roofs and other things, and it is no longer 10 degrees warmer.
So yeah, we can confront what man is doing but we need TRUTH to do it and we get NONE from the Co2 fraud, which is also lying about the reason for fresh water shortages globally = humans taking too much fresh water from nature, and blocking short term solutions like desalination.The difference is that some of us care about truth and Earth, and folks like you care only about
growing government
bilking the taxpayer
taking away people's rights
screaming fear and hate while completely lying

"Some" hardly captures the consensus of over 190 nations and all all reptable climatological institutions, but if your ideological dogma requires you to align with apostates Iran, Libya, Eritrea, and Yemen instead, that is your prerogative, of course.

 

[EMH]

"Some" hardly captures the consensus of over 190 nations and all all reptable climatological institutions, but if your ideological dogma requires you to align with apostates Iran, Libya, Eritrea, and Yemen instead, that is your prerogative, of course.

Parroting is religion to the left wing science invalid. Stick to the Politics section = your IQ fits in there better...

 

[BlindBoo]

The only "anthropogenic" warming ongoing on Earth now is called URBAN HEAT SINK EFFECT, which documents that urban areas warm on the surface as they grow (and convenient for any warming FRAUD, that is most of the data we have).

Yeah our scientist are so stupid not to figure in all that heat absorbing/releasing concrete, steel, asphalt roofs and roads into their observations.........

 

[EMH]

Yeah our scientist are so stupid not to figure in all that heat absorbing/releasing concrete, steel, asphalt roofs and roads into their observations.........

Actually it is the genesis for the "warming" fraud, take that warming and blame it on Co2

It is what Mann, Hansen and Gore learned from the "Global Cooling" "scare" of the 1970s.

 

[jc456]

And the arctic still has a freeze over in the fall and a break up in the spring. Do you think AGW has changed the freezing point of water? Or did you believe that stupid story from the UK? You did didn't you?

Arctic still ice, Antarctic still ice and increasing, means snowfall!

No warming anywhere

 

[schmidlap]

Parroting is religion to the left wing science invalid. Stick to the Politics section = your IQ fits in there better...

Your parroting the science deniers doesn't change the science.

 

[BlindBoo]

Actually it is the genesis for the "warming" fraud, take that warming and blame it on Co2

It is what Mann, Hansen and Gore learned from the "Global Cooling" "scare" of the 1970s.

Yeah? Scientist are so stupid and they think we're stupid too, huh? Everyone knows Time and Newsweek always printed the literal and objective truth. They never played the 70's version of Click-Bait.

 

[EMH]

Your parroting the science deniers doesn't change the science.

WHO am I parroting??

LOL!!

You cannot find this truth anywhere else...

 

[EMH]

Scientist are so stupid

Great English!!

Always who the parrot parrots is altruistic, incapable of selfishness, greed, ambition, desire for fame and media coverage...


Your side LIES...

Sincerely,

2007 British Court

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.

• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.

• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.

• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

 

[jc456]

Your and Iran's, Libya's, Eritrea's, and Yemen's - abstention from the beverage is noted.

yeah, cause you can't say why you need to spend 50 trillion to do absolutely nothing to the atmosphere. You may be stupid, but we ain't.

 

[jc456]

Your parroting the science deniers doesn't change the science.

you don't parrot the koolaid drinkers? hahaahahhaahahhahahaha you think you're oblivious from reality. You make me laugh.

 

[jc456]

It is hardly surprising that ideologues would fixate on Al Gore, rather than science and the empirical climatological data.
I expect that even the residue of hardcore deniers will have their ranks seriously diminished over the next few year.

WMO warns greenhouse gases and El Niño to push global temps to record levels​

Over the next five years, global temperatures could reach record levels. A new report by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) warned that heat-trapping greenhouse gases and a naturally occurring El Niño event will push global temperatures between 2023 and 2027 to more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels for at least one year.​

​

A press release said that there is a 98 percent chance that “at least one of the next five years, and the five-year period as a whole, will be the warmest on record.”​

​

“A warming El Niño is expected to develop in the coming months and this will combine with human-induced climate change to push global temperatures into uncharted territory,” Professor Petteri Taalas, WMO secretary-general, said. “This will have far-reaching repercussions for health, food security, water management and the environment. We need to be prepared.”​

The report said that global temperatures will not “permanently exceed the 1.5°C level specified in the Paris Agreement which refers to long-term warming over many years, but it “will breach the 1.5°C level on a temporary basis with increasing frequency,” Taalas said. The report, which was produced by the United Kingdom’s Met Office, confirmed there is a 32 percent chance that the five-year mean will exceed the 1.5°C threshold.​

[WMO warns greenhouse gases and El Niño to push global temps to record levels | NationofChange]​

I experience 40 degree swings every fall winter and spring and you think 1.9 degree C is significant is a truly stupid thing to back. Again, you make me laugh. So what will 1.9 degree C do exactly that 40 degree swings don't?