Free speech is too dangerous to continue?

Further you said it is ultimately up to the individual to judge what is and is not disinformation and not the role of those in power to dictate that. I agree with that 100%.

But when you hear/read what Kamala, Kerry, Hillary, Gates et al are saying, it should chill the hearts of every American who values our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the unalienable rights and power to the people that our Founders intended. Because those people I named and many others like them want the power to rule the people whatever it takes, including rewriting the Constitution.

A vote for anyone other than Trump and the Republicans is a vote to give them that power.
The child was taught in school that America is the scourge of the world.

All else stems from that.
 
The child was taught in school that America is the scourge of the world.

All else stems from that.
I suspect some of these people attended school before the curriculum was deliberately anti-American though. I can't imagine how in the world they came to think as they do now. Or maybe they don't think and that's the problem.
 
Further you said it is ultimately up to the individual to judge what is and is not disinformation and not the role of those in power to dictate that. I agree with that 100%.

But when you hear/read what Kamala, Kerry, Hillary, Gates et al are saying, it should chill the hearts of every American who values our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the unalienable rights and power to the people that our Founders intended. Because those people I named and many others like them want the power to rule the people whatever it takes, including rewriting the Constitution.

A vote for anyone other than Trump and the Republicans is a vote to give them that power.
Unlike, im actually listening to what they say.

Why would we trust Trump? He had this to say:

That’s far worse than anything you can pin on Dems.
 
I have no idea whatsoever of what you are saying. Care to clarify?
I'm always glad to clarify for the peanut gallery. The democrats are prone to grabbing power for the moment without consideration that there will come a day when they are not in power and what they grabbed will be used against them. Case in point, Harry Reid nuked the filibuster for lower level court appointments because he wanted to get around the roadblocks put in his way by the opposition party exercising their authority. The usual suspects cheered and clapped their flippers, honking their horns in unison, convinced he had done a great thing. When the opposition party, however, used that same tactic to get Supreme Court Justices appointed, the usual suspects all began weeping and wailing that the court was corrupt and only if their candidate could appoint even more Justices would it be less so.
 
Unlike, im actually listening to what they say.

Why would we trust Trump? He had this to say:

That’s far worse than anything you can pin on Dems.
But he didn't suggest anybody actually do it. Angry rhetoric and policy statements are two separate things. I said worse than that about ABC but I have a very strong regard for the First Amendment as does President Trump.
 
But he didn't suggest anybody actually do it. Angry rhetoric and policy statements are two separate things. I said worse than that about ABC but I have a very strong regard for the First Amendment as does President Trump.
He said:
To be honest they are a news organization, they have to be licensed. They ought to take away their license for the way they did that.

So yes, he did suggest the FCC do it. How do you say that he respects the first amendment when he thinks that ABC should be punished by the government for engaging in speech he doesn’t like?
 
You true believers were still touting it as was USMESSAGEBOARD, itself

All the false dossier (and false Covid) information was treated as real and the posts questioning either were moved into the conspiracy section
Yep.
 
John Kerry says First Amendment is the enemy, as elites try to stamp out free speech (nypost.com)

I'm getting close to 80 years old. I don't remember anything in my early schooling about free speech being dangerous. I do recall that in the Former Soviet Union, East Germany, and Mao Tse Tung's China, free speech that criticized the status quo was criminalized and punished severely to discourage wayward thinking that might upset the power structure. The people who instructed me in say, about 1962 when the Cuban Missile Crisis happened, were all survivors of the Great Depression and World War 2. They seemed to go on ad nauseam about how important it was to think and speek freely. A steady drumbeat would leave their lips about how lucky we were to be living in a place where even speech that challenged the government was allowed. These were very different people from what is in control of my home city in New Hampshire today.

My city in New Hampshire has become a very liberal, very woke, place. Those in charge of publishing and editing the local newspaper, the academic rat's nest that leads the centrally located liberal arts college, and the little rodent that hosts the daily morning radio program are public relations for everything those Depression era survivors warned us about all those years ago. You can't say bad things about special people who are trying to do good! That's why free speech that exposes flaws is dangerous! Like the Soviets, East Germans, and the Mao's new China, these people are trying to build a better world! And saying things against it is not only treachery, it's an insurrection!

That's why Donald Trump has to be charged with crimes against the state! The state is good and it is trying to do good things for the people just like the Soviets, East Germans, and Mao's gangs were trying to do! We MAGA fools are apparently too ignorant to grasp the superior thinking taking place today that lays bare the lies we were told when Castro was aiming nuclear warheads at us! Those old teachers in our schools were telling us pack of lies when they told us to protect at all costs the free speech Donald Trump is using! They had to be lying because otherwise Donald Trump could say whatever he wanted and the people could make up their own minds if they wanted to listen! But just like the Soviets, East Germans, and Mao, the government is taking steps to shield us against Donald Trump's dangerous misuse of free speech! See? It's all for our own good!

You know, I have always been leery of people doing things for my own good. The city will go for Harris and walz there is no question about that. The rest of the state? There might be a faint glimmer of hope there.
The patriots in this country are marking the traitor that are a threat to everything we hold deer , this is a ugly hate driven group , proven by this piece of shit comment. The patriots of this great country know who the enemy of this country is and who is this countries biggest threat. How stupid is he ,ask him what communism and woke means.
 
Last edited:
Substitute Hunter's laptop for the Steele Dossier. Now, try and explain how that was not disinformation that affected the election in 2020.
The Micro dick says hunter Biden is guilty of something. Spent years trying to prove the case and couldn't . Without lies and distortions the right couldn't and wouldn't exist
 
We used to think that with enough speech, the truth will win out. That's just not the case in this day and age.
You just don't like truth, facts or reality.

Tim Walz Is DEAD WRONG—Hate Speech, Misinfo Are PROTECTED Speech: Robby Soave​

Premiered Oct 3, 2024


Matt Taibbi (‪@racketnewsbytaibbi‬) | Rescue the Republic​

Sep 30, 2024
 
The Democratic elites hate free speech.


We’ve got to boot these authoritarians out of the party.
All the governing elites hate free speech and free expression.

In fact, if Trump were not still aligning with Bill Barr and Mike Pompeo, I might actually vote for him. But I know how this works.

 
95reat.jpg
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom