Who said anything about "by itself"?
If it's slung over somebody's shoulder, then by definition that person is in control of it. Which means they can do whatever they will with it. And if that person is a stranger walking into a place that has no logical reason to be walking around armed in, but is a place where business is transacted and therefore has cash on the premises .... well do the math.
What, did I forget to post "Duh"?
Let's say the temperature suddenly drops, the wind kicks up and clouds obscure the sun. Are you going to act surprised when it rains?
Well except for the whole "it is perfectly legal" and of course has been for years. Further the protests have been going on for months.
Unfortunately for that point, the thread and the question have nothing to do with "whether it was legal" --- it's about whether it is a reasonable assumption that four guys walking into a restaurant armed --- an establishment that in no way suggests firearms would be necessary ---- are up to no good. And the answer, obviously, is yes it is a reasonable assumption. If it's not obvious enough: Luby's. If that's not enough: Louisiana Pizza Kitchen. Etc etc etc.
Once again for the terminally stupid.... the sight of a firearm does not justify in and of itself calling the cops. The person that did is an idiot. Further the claim that employees hid in the freezer is denied. Further evidenced by the fact one of them posed with the weapon carriers.
Your ilk have been claiming for YEARS now that open carry would lead to wild west shoot outs and have repeated that claim in this thread. Yet it has not happened EVER. Not in ANY State with open carry. Get a new claim, this one is so tired and ignorant as to defy logic as to it being used.
I'll have to confer with "my ilk" at the next Ilks Club meeting to see what they posted on my behalf, but from where I sit what I've heard from
your ilk is that everybody should walk around armed all the time and that the answer to a guy with a gun is... more guys with more guns!
Which is stupid. As I and my ilk actually
have said, that's like fighting a fire by pouring gasoline on it. And what Rightwinger is doing with the scenario of standing his ground is taking that fallacy to its obviously fallacious conclusion. Which exposes that nutball idea for the fallacy it is.
Further as some of you have suggested others should shot on sight anyone carrying a weapon that is in fact illegal and ignorant. And in fact you not the 2nd Amendment rights people are making the claim. All with no evidence of a threat or reason for such a claim. The simple exsistance 0f A FIREARM IN AN OPEN CARRY STATE IS NOT JUSTIFICATION OR EVEN LOGIC REASON FOR SHOOTING SOMEONE AND ANYONE stupid ENOUGH TO DO IT WILL GO STRAIGHT TO JAIL AND BE CHARGED WITH AN ACTUAL CRIME.
You knee jerk dumb asses are proof positive that you have no brains no common sense and even less intelligence to conduct a logical conversation.
Already addressed above. The fallacy loses.