Former Secret Service Agent Issues ‘Challenge’ to Liberals

[Dale Smith]

That's not entirely true, as he was only in office for a 8 months of that fiscal year, and wasn't even responsible for creating that annual budget. So how can you blame 2009 on him?

You do understand the debt owed to the Fed bankers is the responsibility of USA.INC and not us...right? USA.INC is a private corporation that was taken into receivership by the IMF with the 1950 bankruptcy after the Fed bankers bankrupted USA.INC after taking it into recievership wiht the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of 1933 where they confiscated the nation's gold. I am not employed by USA.INC....are you? USA.INC was created to provide the 19 essential services of "gubermint" and they did it as a "for profit" venture but duped us into being responsible for the bill while skimming off the top thus the reason they run a deficit while amassing HUGE sums of wealth because they can pass their bookkeeping losses off on us. The CAFR is the "mack daddy", holy grail, mother lode of information where ALL corporations have to fill one out. Everything this "gubermint" provides is incorporated...even the Supreme Court is incorporated, The FBI is incorporated and why is that significant? Because if you are incorporated, you are under the Universal Commercial Code and admiralty law. Every state is "incorporated and a subsidiary of USA.INC...ALMOST every city, town and county is incorporated and they are subsidiaries of the state which like I said is a subsidiary of USA.INC whose headquarters are in the city/state that is Washington D.C. We have been made debt slaves to this massive corporate entity because we unknowingly gave them our consent through cohesion contracts that we didn't even realize that we were making. Our ignorance of how things REALLY are is why they have been able to get away with robbing us blind...so fuck Barrypuppet and all the other corporate officers that try to tell us they they "represent us"...these barristers have only one entity that they have to be loyal to and that is what is in the best interest of USA.INC which has been owned by international bankers since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

Can you handle the truth? Because there it is...laid out for you in short form.

Wait, when is the last time you received a bill from China for the debt owed to them? Or from Russia? I've never gotten one... but I have used the health care system, driven on the paved roads, called the police...

Do you realize that you pay a mountain of taxes to provide for those? Do you realize that your income tax does not go towards paying anything that USA.INC provides? That all goes to the Fed bankers. Did you know that USA.INC has been skimming off the top since the Bretton Woods agreement and has invested that in the stock markets both foreign and domestic and that the composite "gubermints" of USA.INC are currently sitting on about 145 TRILLION dollars in assets? They own majority stock in every Fortune 500 corporation and their subsidiaries....it's in the CAFR. USA.INC takes in 4 times more in dividend payments than it actually needs even with a bloated military to pay the bill...but they always run a deficit...and why is that? Because they can run up the company credit card, send the bill to us without touching a dime of the wealth they have accrued.

BTW, even the police departments are incorporated. Their main duty is to enforce acts, statutes and codes all designed to bring in money for the city, town or county that they work for......

I hope you don't take this personally, but when I read your posts, I see a vision of a guy wearing a tinfoil hat.

Ask him about 9/11. Or go to the Conspiracy section and prepare to be amused.

Candyporn SEZ????? "My beloved gubermint would never lie to me!!!!!!"

What a blithering idiot.

 

[ogibillm]

why does his former employment matter?

Why doesn't it?

off the top of my head i'd say it doesn't matter because it didn't make him an expert on the economy. in fact his work experience would seem to be totally irrelevant when discussing economic policy.

now, why do you think his previous employment is worthy of mention?

 

[candycorn]

[

He didn’t stop being an agent…he was dismissed.

You're not known for your honesty, quite the opposite.

Care to provide a link to show that you're not just lying again?

I will when Trump releases his tax returns.

 

[P@triot]

Why is he/she a former Secret Service Agent?

Because he was disgusted having to provide security to Barack Obama (yes - he was on the Presidential Protection Detail or PPD) after listening to all of Barack lies in public and then hearing what Barack was saying and doing behind closed doors. He wants Constitutional government and he saw and heard Barack usurping the Constitution to form his own new marxist government.

Then glad he stopped being an agent, since their job is to well do their job, not decide who should and shouldn't be protected based on political views.

He didn’t stop being an agent…he was dismissed.

Another day....another lie by Candy. She never heard of him before, but she's going to tell everyone he was "fired" to protect the hands that feed her.

He left the Secret Service to run for office after he saw what was going on. These are the facts and they are indisputable.

 

[P@triot]

[

He didn’t stop being an agent…he was dismissed.

You're not known for your honesty, quite the opposite.

Care to provide a link to show that you're not just lying again?

I will when Trump releases his tax returns.

Boom! She just admitted she is lying.

I would like to propose to everyone here and now putting her on ignore. First, why waste your time sifting through posts of people who admit they are posting lies here? Second, once she has nobody to giving her the attention she desperately desires, she'll just go away and find another board to attempt to get a reaction from people.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why would only liberals have to answer? Liberals have a better record of managing the national debt.

You would have to ask Dan Bongino that. I can only speculate as to what was in his mind.

You're the one who posted this.

 

[P@triot]

Why would only liberals have to answer? Liberals have a better record of managing the national debt.

You would have to ask Dan Bongino that. I can only speculate as to what was in his mind.

You're the one who posted this.

What kind of "logic" is that? I posted a headline in the news. That makes me responsible for what the person in the news was thinking, what the person who interviewed them was thinking, and what the entire news organization that posted it was thinking, why they posted it, etc.?

I find it fascinating that you, TC, and so many other liberals are peeing down your legs over these three simple questions. Now only do all of you refuse to answer it, but it's almost like you're afraid they are out there. Because you're trying to take everyone off of the topic ("well what does his job have to do with anything", "why is he no longer with the Secret Service", "you're the one who posted this"). I mean, either answer the question or run and hide. Why the need to attempt to derail and hijack the substance of the post? What is it exactly that you are so afraid of? You know what's hilarious - I find nothing insightful from these three questions. Simply because it was a headline, I posted to see how liberals would answer - never realizing that you guys would be paralyzed by fear over it. Frankly, if these scare you, you don't want any part of me. Because I can literally come up with a 1,000 questions that are better and much more damaging to the irrational liberal ideology.

 

[Little-Acorn]

What's the point? The liberals will simply lie. It's what liberals do.

But every time they do - they have to defend that lie with yet another lie. It's why they can't engage in a debate without getting angry and resorting to violence. Lying really wears people down - especially when pressed by people loaded with facts and data.

Liberals have gotten away with it for the last fifty-plus years. Is there any reason to think they won't keep getting away with it?

 

[P@triot]

What's the point? The liberals will simply lie. It's what liberals do.

But every time they do - they have to defend that lie with yet another lie. It's why they can't engage in a debate without getting angry and resorting to violence. Lying really wears people down - especially when pressed by people loaded with facts and data.

Liberals have gotten away with it for the last fifty-plus years. Is there any reason to think they won't keep getting away with it?

I wouldn't say they have "gotten away" with anything. I think the more this stuff is pointed out, the more credibility they lose (and supporters). Just look at them losing their mind here on USMB any time their lies are proven.

 

[imawhosure]

Why would only liberals have to answer? Liberals have a better record of managing the national debt.

You would have to ask Dan Bongino that. I can only speculate as to what was in his mind.

You're the one who posted this.

What kind of "logic" is that? I posted a headline in the news. That makes me responsible for what the person in the news was thinking, what the person who interviewed them was thinking, and what the entire news organization that posted it was thinking, why they posted it, etc.?

I find it fascinating that you, TC, and so many other liberals are peeing down your legs over these three simple questions. Now only do all of you refuse to answer it, but it's almost like you're afraid they are out there. Because you're trying to take everyone off of the topic ("well what does his job have to do with anything", "why is he no longer with the Secret Service", "you're the one who posted this"). I mean, either answer the question or run and hide. Why the need to attempt to derail and hijack the substance of the post? What is it exactly that you are so afraid of? You know what's hilarious - I find nothing insightful from these three questions. Simply because it was a headline, I posted to see how liberals would answer - never realizing that you guys would be paralyzed by fear over it. Frankly, if these scare you, you don't want any part of me. Because I can literally come up with a 1,000 questions that are better and much more damaging to the irrational liberal ideology.

Again I say-------> liberals can never put limits on their ask, because if they do, once the ask or demand is passed by, they then must become conservatives. FOR INSTANCE---> If someone insists I give a percentage of my income I think is fair, once I proclaim it, if the government exceeds that number, I must switch sides to now proclaiming that I am over taxed, or I would be considered to personally be a liar.

If you ever notice, 2 things are clear.............1. when libs talk about taxes, they always talk about SOMEONE else's taxes and what they should pay, not their own. (did you see Bernie only paid in the 13% range, and Obama only paid in the 17% range, lol)

And 2, most regular people who are lefties willing to leave the tax rate an open issue and will not define fair are.......either A. Very rich and can move their money away from the taxing authority, or B. pay little or no taxes, so have no problem at all defining for everyone else what they should pay, along with what everyone else should pay for so they don't have to.

A very good test for this, is suggest EVERY working person making 1 dollar must pay tax if even 1 cent, and that nobody can ever get back more in taxes than they put in. (which is F-A-I-R) Watch them all scream like stuck pigs, because they are the pigs; pigs at the trough of free money..........money that they take from everyone else through legalized theft, use the government as the legal middle man, then vote to transfer those taxes to themselves, by which candidate they vote for.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why would only liberals have to answer? Liberals have a better record of managing the national debt.

You would have to ask Dan Bongino that. I can only speculate as to what was in his mind.

You're the one who posted this.

What kind of "logic" is that? I posted a headline in the news. That makes me responsible for what the person in the news was thinking, what the person who interviewed them was thinking, and what the entire news organization that posted it was thinking, why they posted it, etc.?

I find it fascinating that you, TC, and so many other liberals are peeing down your legs over these three simple questions. Now only do all of you refuse to answer it, but it's almost like you're afraid they are out there. Because you're trying to take everyone off of the topic ("well what does his job have to do with anything", "why is he no longer with the Secret Service", "you're the one who posted this"). I mean, either answer the question or run and hide. Why the need to attempt to derail and hijack the substance of the post? What is it exactly that you are so afraid of? You know what's hilarious - I find nothing insightful from these three questions. Simply because it was a headline, I posted to see how liberals would answer - never realizing that you guys would be paralyzed by fear over it. Frankly, if these scare you, you don't want any part of me. Because I can literally come up with a 1,000 questions that are better and much more damaging to the irrational liberal ideology.

Again I say-------> liberals can never put limits on their ask, because if they do, once the ask or demand is passed by, they then must become conservatives. FOR INSTANCE---> If someone insists I give a percentage of my income I think is fair, once I proclaim it, if the government exceeds that number, I must switch sides to now proclaiming that I am over taxed, or I would be considered to personally be a liar.

If you ever notice, 2 things are clear.............1. when libs talk about taxes, they always talk about SOMEONE else's taxes and what they should pay, not their own. (did you see Bernie only paid in the 13% range, and Obama only paid in the 17% range, lol)

And 2, most regular people who are lefties willing to leave the tax rate an open issue and will not define fair are.......either A. Very rich and can move their money away from the taxing authority, or B. pay little or no taxes, so have no problem at all defining for everyone else what they should pay, along with what everyone else should pay for so they don't have to.

A very good test for this, is suggest EVERY working person making 1 dollar must pay tax if even 1 cent, and that nobody can ever get back more in taxes than they put in. (which is F-A-I-R) Watch them all scream like stuck pigs, because they are the pigs; pigs at the trough of free money..........money that they take from everyone else through legalized theft, use the government as the legal middle man, then vote to transfer those taxes to themselves, by which candidate they vote for.

Taxes are put to a vote.

 

[imawhosure]

Why would only liberals have to answer? Liberals have a better record of managing the national debt.

You would have to ask Dan Bongino that. I can only speculate as to what was in his mind.

You're the one who posted this.

What kind of "logic" is that? I posted a headline in the news. That makes me responsible for what the person in the news was thinking, what the person who interviewed them was thinking, and what the entire news organization that posted it was thinking, why they posted it, etc.?

I find it fascinating that you, TC, and so many other liberals are peeing down your legs over these three simple questions. Now only do all of you refuse to answer it, but it's almost like you're afraid they are out there. Because you're trying to take everyone off of the topic ("well what does his job have to do with anything", "why is he no longer with the Secret Service", "you're the one who posted this"). I mean, either answer the question or run and hide. Why the need to attempt to derail and hijack the substance of the post? What is it exactly that you are so afraid of? You know what's hilarious - I find nothing insightful from these three questions. Simply because it was a headline, I posted to see how liberals would answer - never realizing that you guys would be paralyzed by fear over it. Frankly, if these scare you, you don't want any part of me. Because I can literally come up with a 1,000 questions that are better and much more damaging to the irrational liberal ideology.

Again I say-------> liberals can never put limits on their ask, because if they do, once the ask or demand is passed by, they then must become conservatives. FOR INSTANCE---> If someone insists I give a percentage of my income I think is fair, once I proclaim it, if the government exceeds that number, I must switch sides to now proclaiming that I am over taxed, or I would be considered to personally be a liar.

If you ever notice, 2 things are clear.............1. when libs talk about taxes, they always talk about SOMEONE else's taxes and what they should pay, not their own. (did you see Bernie only paid in the 13% range, and Obama only paid in the 17% range, lol)

And 2, most regular people who are lefties willing to leave the tax rate an open issue and will not define fair are.......either A. Very rich and can move their money away from the taxing authority, or B. pay little or no taxes, so have no problem at all defining for everyone else what they should pay, along with what everyone else should pay for so they don't have to.

A very good test for this, is suggest EVERY working person making 1 dollar must pay tax if even 1 cent, and that nobody can ever get back more in taxes than they put in. (which is F-A-I-R) Watch them all scream like stuck pigs, because they are the pigs; pigs at the trough of free money..........money that they take from everyone else through legalized theft, use the government as the legal middle man, then vote to transfer those taxes to themselves, by which candidate they vote for.

Taxes are put to a vote.

Really? Hey NY, are you really in New York? So tell all of us---------->how many times, and how many votes did you cast for the soda tax, or rather.....soda exclusion?