Former FBI Director James Comey: "86 47"

That’s also why the Romans were threatened by Jesus and had him crucified. They wanted the Jews to worship Caesar, and the Roman government, not a Jewish leader.
free-speech-for-me-but-not-for-thee-v0-tztfgdlw231f1.png
perhaps yes, but it was mainly due to Jesus disrupting their animal sacrifice business.
 
Right. Just like you aren’t allowed to criticize Israel and get away with it.

This is the problem with being able to redefine speech as illegal threats whenever you feel like it. You get to silence anyone you want.
Normally you say dumb things but I really have to agree with this post of yours.

It is indeed the case that we cannot criticize Israel. We cannot criticize anything bad a Jew does, either, and if we do, we get smeared as an antisemite.

And yes, these people, most Western governments, and especially my government, the Canadian government, LOVE redefining pre-existing English words in a way that allows them to jail anybody they want, for saying stuff that they don't like to hear.
 
Well this isn't at all threatening or frightening or unacceptable.

Remember he's one of the GOOD guys!



Gee, I wonder how this would play out if that were referring to a Democrat?

Let the triggered, snowflake wailing begin!
 
No one is above the law.

Not even James Comey.

THAT WAS NOT A DOG WHISTLE TO KILL TRUMP! THAT WAS A BULLHORN TO KILL TRUMP!!

Did I get your ****** mantra correct, lefties? That is what you assholes say, right?
 
The Secret Service may try to force former FBI Director James Comey to answer pointed questions into a social media post he issued depicting an image of “8647,” but a U.S. attorney whom President Trump appointed will determine whether to prosecute Comey over the post.

If Comey refuses to comply with their request for what’s known as a protective intelligence interview, the Secret Service leading the investigation into the Instagram post can apply for a subpoena through an assistant U.S. attorney. It’s that prosecutor who will determine whether the former FBI director is legally required to answer their questions, and the full U.S. attorney in the office ultimately will decide whether to bring charges against him for threatening the president, Secret Service sources tell RealClearPolitics.

As an attorney and former top law enforcement official in the nation, Comey is well aware that he can decline an interview without having an attorney present, so he may refuse to cooperate with Secret Service agents’ questioning until he can hire a lawyer to represent him. On the other hand, Comey could agree to demonstrate how open and transparent he is and immediately cooperate and sit down for an interview.

 
86 means to get rid of

Untwist your panties
 
Jimmy boy needs to get a life. He threw it out there for attention because he gets none anymore. I’m thinking he rethought it since he deleted it because he’s probably gonna get some attention now.
 
86 is “cancel that order” and its implication here is actually unambiguous.
Thats why he would never be convicted in court for it, however, i bet this DOES give them them subpoena powers to spy on everything Comey has done in recent years. They could just go to a MAGA friendly judge and make the following request.

"Your honor, if a man on Comey's level is making threats against a president, it could possibly even include collusion with a foreign enemy. For this reason, we request access to all of his phone, travel and other digital records, including his private emails over the last decade."

God only knows what they would find if they got all that info.
 
He sure triggered the cultists.
You got Prog Entertainer shills given speeches like Springsteen in front of crowds telling lies or he is just a fool like many of the species. If you suffer individual fascism from someone or more than one you know it. And I agree with that. It is the lame the whole group or groups for nothing they did wrong that is the real disease and the real fascism. In affect reverse fascism.
 
Moroner is one of the most deranged leftists on this site. He’d probably say that putting out a hit is “free speech” - as long as it’s against Trump.
leftist are just violent people that justifiy their violence and hate through whatever means necessary
 
Ignoring the fact that you can't even speak English properly:

If mere words can "incite violence" against someone, there is a good chance that this person really did do something.

If I said something like, "Let's punch Mother Teresa in the face!!" Do you think I would get a lot of support?

Some people are really, really, really stupid.
Yeah, you seem to be one of them....

Let's see here...You start out attacking my English, dead give away that you have no argument...

But, let's investigate your weak assed point....Tell us what the hypothetical, 19 year old Jewish student headed to the library said?

What's astonishing is that you start out with an off topic claim with NO particulars, just a blanket troll, then when called to explain, you attack the person asking you the question, and end it with "people are stupid".... You're absolutely correct, only you are the one exhibiting your own stupidity here...
 
It appears to be a pattern of behavior. From October '24....

1747402248466.webp
 
15th post
86 means to get rid of

Untwist your panties
Yes, this is off the charts nonsense like when the Democarts got mad when whats her face had the website with bullseyes focusing on political opponents to focus efforts on running against. But if the Secret Service want to have some some tea with him, thats fine.
 
Back
Top Bottom