Former FBI Director James Comey: "86 47"

No, they’re definitely saying it can only mean one thing both explicitly and implicitly.

Comey is a serious person and the idea that he is calling for violence is absurd.
Whether someone's done something wrong, or in this case, whether someone's calling for violence, does not depend on your personal opinion of him/her.
 
Whether someone's done something wrong, or in this case, whether someone's calling for violence, does not depend on your personal opinion of him/her.

But it does. In an ambiguous situation, we are required to make a judgment and that is mostly based on the character of the person in question.

Comey has demonstrated himself to be a serious and honest person. He’s not the kind of person to make veiled calls for violence.
 
But it does. In an ambiguous situation, we are required to make a judgment and that is mostly based on the character of the person in question.
This certainly makes sense.

However, you can't really be sure, since it's an ambiguous situation. So why did you categorically call people delusional like you're absolutely sure they're wrong?
 
Seizing personal property without proper justification is a violation of civil rights.

We will probably settle the lawsuit for $10-30 million.
Calling for the murder of the sitting U.S. president is justification enough.

In fact, it’s a Class D felony and punishable by up to 5 years in prison.

Shameful that a former FBI director thinks to do this. Shows how much TDS damages the brain.
 
This certainly makes sense.

However, you can't really be sure, since it's an ambiguous situation. So why did you categorically call people delusional like you're absolutely sure they're wrong?

But they’re absolutely sure they’re right. Don’t you agree that would be delusional?

If there’s ambiguity, the idea that it could be prosecuted is absurd.
 
Right and as a former director of the FBI he knows how the message could be perceived. Comey still the weasel trying to play stupid.
With two assassination attempts already, and one a new miss, the former FBI director should be brought up on charges. There are plenty of deranged TDSers who could be encouraged to act on it.
 
Last edited:
Calling for the murder of the sitting U.S. president is justification enough.

In fact, it’s a Class D felony and punishable by up to 5 years in prison.

Shameful that a former FBI director thinks to do this. Shows how much TDS damages the brain.

Your brain is so damaged that you think it is a call for violence.

But of course you spend much of your time attacking other people’s speech, which is what we’d expect from a wanna be fascist society.
 
But they’re absolutely sure they’re right. Don’t you agree that would be delusional?

If there’s ambiguity, the idea that it could be prosecuted is absurd.
The only reason you believe they think they are absolutely right is so that you can call them delusional and dismiss them. You literally don't know what people are thinking.

Anyway, I fail to see the point of arguing with you. You will never admit that you tried to explain away Comey's behavior.


Your brain is so damaged that you think it is a call for violence.

But of course you spend much of your time attacking other people’s speech, which is what we’d expect from a wanna be fascist society.
It's definitely a veiled call for violence.
 
Your brain is so damaged that you think it is a call for violence.

But of course you spend much of your time attacking other people’s speech, which is what we’d expect from a wanna be fascist society.
Of course it is. You don’t call to “86” the president and expect to get away with it.

Unless you consider being an accessory before the fact - which is what Comey could be charged with if there’s another assassination attempt - is merely “free speech.”

And again, riling up more violence against Jewish kids in college - especially when done by an Arab foreigner here by invitation - is not free speech.
 
And again, riling up more violence against Jewish kids in college - especially when done by an Arab foreigner - is not free speech.
Telling the truth about what Israel does is not riling up violence against Jews.
 
15th post
Telling the truth about what Israel does is not riling up violence against Jews.
P.S. Then tell me what these “anti-Israel” protests are resulting in assaults, harassment, and bullying against Jews.
Clearly, spreading HAMAS lies is indeed riling up violence against Jews
 
I’m dying to know how Comey violated Trump’s rights. Please tell.
People have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness…part of that implies a freedom of threats to one’s life

Comey is clearly threatening to murder trump

You think it’s ok for people to do that? You don’t think people should live a life free from that threat?

You clearly are a fascist
 
Back
Top Bottom