"for white people only"

That is apparently what diplomatic officials in South Africa were told when they attempted to process some folks of mixed race for the US "asylum" program.

And at the same time they are claiming the immigrant pogrom currently underway isn't about their color.

Does nobody see the problem here?

Alternet? Kook site…
 
That is apparently what diplomatic officials in South Africa were told when they attempted to process some folks of mixed race for the US "asylum" program.

And at the same time they are claiming the immigrant pogrom currently underway isn't about their color.

Does nobody see the problem here?


Apparently. From an unnamed source. A source close to. Always with the leftist media.
 
That is apparently what diplomatic officials in South Africa were told when they attempted to process some folks of mixed race for the US "asylum" program.

And at the same time they are claiming the immigrant pogrom currently underway isn't about their color.

Does nobody see the problem here?

If they are merely enforcing existing immigration law, then I see the color as irrelevant.
 
That is apparently what diplomatic officials in South Africa were told when they attempted to process some folks of mixed race for the US "asylum" program.

And at the same time they are claiming the immigrant pogrom currently underway isn't about their color.

Does nobody see the problem here?

No.
 
Why do you think 47 high-tailed to Scotland? He running away from Epstein.
He's a convicted felon, and according to him his father came here from Germany so he's an anchor baby too.

Do you suppose they will let him back in?
 
Irrelevant. It’s not a victimhood contest; if some whites are victims, they are victims.
Not a legitimate reason for why these white South Africans are the only "refugees" being allowed into the U.S.

It's only "legitimate" if you are a racist.
 
Not a legitimate reason for why these white South Africans are the only "refugees" being allowed into the U.S.

It's only "legitimate" if you are a racist.
Again, irrelevant. I didn’t say they were victims, I said IF some are victims then they are victims. Citing “400 years of the history of South Africa.” is irrelevant to that point unless you feel revenge racism is justified or proper.
 
15th post
I see the problem. . . .


"Reuters was unable to independently verify the precise language in the email which was described to the news agency by three sources familiar with its contents."

Reuters stooping to the level of clickbait and doing shoddy . . . .

a1e1oh.gif
/thread
 
But those white South Africans did come here, and black Africans have been deported. Plausible deniability just doesn't work in this case.
Links?
 
Yeah....let's just ignore the past 400 years of the history of South Africa, imbecile.
To run a nation into massive poverty as to prove racial inequalities of the past and there must be revenge is suicidal. Eventually there will be possible mass depravities of many in the population. South Africa is heading into a darkness that many nations have entered. So, from your spew, Greenland needs to be freed by the United States as Denmark is oppressive.
 
Back
Top Bottom