For the record: He never said it and he never will.

[TemplarKormac]

Should we just ignore what politicians say?

Most of the time, yes. With prejudice.

 

[GLASNOST]

Should we just ignore what politicians say?

That’s the question we are all asking and the answer we all want to know.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I know this is a waste of time -- you can't prove anything to a Trumpster -- but just for fun:

You purposefully twisted his words.

"I am your retribution" did not mean he was going to take revenge on his political enemies; he was vowing to be the paragon of the voter's retribution against Biden and the left.

He said, "In 2016 I declared, "I am your voice." Today I add, I am your warrior, I am your justice, and for those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution."

"For those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution," he said. Taken in context, what part of that suggested he was going to retaliate against his political enemies?

Try answering Fox's challenge honestly.

 

[GLASNOST]

You purposefully ...

Yes.

... twisted his words.

Yes.

"I am your retribution" did not mean he was going to take revenge on his political enemies; he was vowing to be the paragon of the voter's retribution against Biden and the left.

Thank you. The problem in the US is that very few citizens really understand English: a weak vocabulary, poor grammar, dreadful punctuation, and taking everything out of context. That's why Americans need guns ..... it's the only language they understand.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Yes.

Yes.

Thank you. The problem in the US is that very few citizens really understand English: a weak vocabulary, poor grammar, dreadful punctuation, and taking everything out of context. That's why Americans need guns ..... it's the only language they understand.

In this case, it's not a lack of understanding and comprehension. It's a mendacious will to twist vocabulary to purposefully smear someone and deceive people who do lack understanding and comprehension.

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[GLASNOST]

In this case, it's not a lack of understanding and comprehension. It's a mendacious will to twist vocabulary to purposefully smear someone and deceive people who do lack understanding and comprehension.

Yes I know, but I was trying to be diplomatic.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Yes I know, but I was trying to be diplomatic.

Fair enough.

I appreciate diplomacy. But in this political world, we must be both diplomatic and undiplomatic. You can't get punched and not punch back.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You purposefully twisted his words.

"I am your retribution" did not mean he was going to take revenge on his political enemies; he was vowing to be the picture of the voter's retribution against Biden and the left.

He said, "In 2016 I declared, "I am your voice." Today I add, I am your warrior, I am your justice, and for those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution."

"For those who have been wronged and betrayed I am your retribution," he said. Taken in context, what part of that suggested he was going to retaliate against his political enemies?

Try answering Fox's challenge honestly.

I knew I got your attention, Mac1958 . But you do run away and laugh.

Scared to take me on?

 

[GLASNOST]

Fair enough.

I appreciate diplomacy. But in this political world, we must be both diplomatic and undiplomatic. You can't get punched and not punch back.

As long as the "punch back" is a legitimate KO.

 

[TemplarKormac]

As long as the "punch back" is a legitimate KO.

Exactly. I like your style.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[GWV5903]

What was the context he used it in?

If you need my help finding where he said this, then you clearly have no understanding of the words or his intent, but I knew this already, just want to make it clear…

 

[Foxfyre]

Yes I know, but I was trying to be diplomatic.

Well having crossed swords with you a few times and not finding any compromise to agree on, I will agree that you generally are pretty diplomatic. And that is appreciated and respected.

This thread is such a great illustration though of intended or unintended intellectual dishonesty when it comes to things like the OP. The TDS crowd (and other labels you and I disagree on ) want so badly to believe that Trump said he will take revenge that they probably have convinced themselves that is what he said. Which he didn't. It is fascinating to watch them twist themselves into pretzels unsuccessfully trying to justify their point of view, but oh well.

 

[GLASNOST]

... I will agree that you generally are pretty diplomatic. And that is appreciated and respected.

Thank you.

... The TDS crowd ... want so badly to believe that Trump said he will take revenge that they probably have convinced themselves that is what he said. Which he didn't.

I agree.

 

[Kruska]

FOR THE RECORD:

I challenge any and/or every leftist/Democrat/woke person/hopelessly TDS afflicted to show me a single video or audio clip of Trump saying he intends to get revenge on his political opponents, no matter how bad they were. Never happened. Never will. He has never said that no matter how much you dishonestly spin what he actually has said.

Don't give me memes. Don't give me quotes of what others say he has said. And don't give me edited video or audio that leaves out the full context and intent of what he is saying. Plucking one line out of a conversation and leaving out all the conversation that qualifies that one line is dishonesty of the worst sort.

Let's see some integrity from the left. If you are going to accuse Trump, show your evidence.

1. Scumbag supporters don't give a rats ass about FACTS that criticize or "disgrace" their Messiahs, neither does any other radical, who adheres to whatever other political party.

2. If you, e.g. a Scumbag supporter is even too dumb to listen and evaluate Trumps PUBLIC speeches and his own social media bull contributions - then why do you place such an irrelevant question and post, being a scumbag supporter??

Because you are fully aware that your Messiahs is a pathological fraudster and Liar - who only propagates BULL and known discontent to please the dumb - but factually has never kept his "promises" and "say".

E.g. just one of his countless comments to further agitate the dumb and thus to garner their votes.
Trump had described Harris’ failure to control migration as so severe that people have been “murdered because of her action at the border.” He publicly stated in his campaign rally in Pennsylvania in September that Harris “should be impeached and prosecuted” for her role in permitting what he termed an “invasion” of the U.S. by undocumented immigrants.

I had watched that above mentioned campaign rally on TV. - And YES he clearly said it.

Now let's see if he goes after her after January 2025 - in order to prove his "sincerity" to his sheep.
If not - well no surprise - after all he is just a pathological fraudster and liar.

BTW; Democrat politicians had clearly stated - that they will go after Trump for his crimes and matters concerning breaking the laws.
And HEY you know what? - they actually did it

​

 

[Kruska]

Should we just ignore what politicians say?

NO - the public need to go after them - only then their lies and fake promises might stop.

 

[Care4all]

Lots of money made off of Trump's Revenge Tour, by his fans.....!

Amazon.com

www.amazon.com

.

Trump 2024 The Revenge Tour Flag 3x5 Ft Outdoor Fade Resistant Polyester Durable One Size​

$10.99

​

About this item​

• Trump 2024 flag: Let all the world know we are Trump supporters, fly in the pride, show our attitude.

 

[Care4all]

Anyone see the 60politicians Kash Patel named in his book that are on his REVENGE LIST of going after when Trump's in power again?

All on Trumps Hit List..... Not mentioning what CRIMES were committed for the DOJ to go after them....just that revenge WILL be sought....these people did NOTHING to hurt YOU, but Trump sees them as HIS foes....

The whole purpose of this Trump Revenge tour, is to stymie future investigations of him.....make them scared, and others who see wrong doing of Trump's, NOT speak up, or Trump's warriors will go after them.....

Y'all don't know your idol very well....

 

[Mac1958]

Anyone see the 60politicians Kash Patel named in his book that are on his REVENGE LIST of going after when Trump's in power again?

All on Trumps Hit List..... Not mentioning what CRIMES were committed for the DOJ to go after them....just that revenge WILL be sought....these people did NOTHING to hurt YOU, but Trump sees them as HIS foes....

The whole purpose of this Trump Revenge tour, is to stymie future investigations of him.....make them scared, and others who see wrong doing of Trump's, NOT speak up, or Trump's warriors will go after them.....

Y'all don't know your idol very well....

And that's the key to this. They're pretending that Trump hasn't played the revenge game at his rallies, that his groupies don't love it (and even celebrate it on this very thread), and that he's not appointing hardcore ideologues to formerly independent positions who have been even more aggressive with their accusations, right out in the open, than he has.

They're just playing a game here. There is no communicating with this, because they're not honest. They'll cheer and try to justify the revenge (and/or attempts at revenge) as it plays out, because they're consumed by manipulated rage. It has literally become a lifestyle for them.