? For liberals: If taxes go up on rich, how will you feel about consequences?

[Urkie]

Keep laughing sewer boy. Tax breaks do not add to debt. Government spending does shithead. Economics 101 shit for brains.

Politicians create the ******* DEBT with their spending. And they're spending us and future generations into slavery just to pay off their elaborate Socialist programs for those that refuse to work to even PAY taxes.

Wake the HELL up...

And what party was in power the last decade when the national debt doubled? Yeah, Republicans sure know what they're talking about.

 

[taichiliberal]

The Bush tax cuts. If they expire, massive tax hikes on rich people and rich companies will ensue.

Liberals: If you are at work in January, for a wealthy company or wealthy boss, and you the Bush cuts to expire as Obama wants, how will you feel if you get called into the office and told:


"Since Washington let the tax cuts expire, we can't afford the staff your division as is. 40% of you will be laid off. It will be a randomly selected group. You'll know within 2 weeks."

If you lose your job due to Obama allowing the companies and rich people to get their taxes hiked, how will you feel? Or, what if you come to work after watching MSNBC applaud Obama no longer allowing tax breaks for the rich, and find out your best friend at work got laid off, because it turns out the Bush tax cuts allowed enough capital for that company to expand your division 6 years ago and hire both of you, but now they cant afford you both and one has to go?????

Never forget, as much as you lefties hate the rich and hate corporations, they provide the jobs in this country. If you want a good paying, stable job, most likely it's gonna be working for a rich person or company. Thats reality, and I'm thankful for the rich who have employed me and don't want their taxes to go up, because the more money they send to Washington DC, the less money they send to their employees.

Reality check:


Five myths about the Bush tax cuts



Five myths about the Bush tax cuts

 

[8537]

. Tax breaks do not add to debt

Money just falls from heaven to enrich the pockets of government as God's way of thanking us for reducing taxes!

it's the money fairy!

Did you call someone else "shit for brains?" "Wake the HELL up.."

 

[Synthaholic]

Definition of PROFIT

1
: a valuable return : gain
2
: the excess of returns over expenditure in a transaction or series of transactions; especially : the excess of the selling price of goods over their cost
3
: net income usually for a given period of time​

I really gotta get me one of those leftist dictionaries. Apparently, it's just a ______________ after every word, so you can make up your own meaning.

You do know that non-profits make money, don't you?

Dumbass.

"...don't claim that making money isn't profit."

Dumbass.

Wow - you really are clueless about the real world. Probably from spending your adult life closed up in an AF office, secure in the knowledge that your job and your pension and your health care, etc., etc., etc. are taking care of by Nanny Government.

Non-profits make money. They are not allowed to make a profit. Now go get some businessman to explain that to you.

 

[Synthaholic]

Maybe the more adventuress Liberals could try working for a while without punching in. See how long it takes to sink in. I had a friend way back, we worked together, at a popular place in Santa Cruz, Ca., anyway, he liked to bury his pay checks like a squirrel and just let them rot. Drove the book keeper crazy, the boss loved him for it.

See daveman about that. He's the expert.


Oh, wait...I read that wrong. I thought you said 'punch in without working'.

12 broken aircraft worth a half-billion dollars safely stopped by aircraft arresting gear I maintained and certified, manned by 18 priceless aircrew. Now I manage a fleet of equipment worth a billion dollars.

All without ever leaving your computer chair!

 

[Synthaholic]

Why would spending money cause a recession? That's mental.

It's called Debt braniac.

And that debt is Generational theft and it's creating obstensively a new slavery class to pay it off.

Then you oppose adding $700 BILLION to that generational theft by extending the Bush Tax Cuts for the very wealthiest Americans?

 

[Synthaholic]

It's called Debt braniac.

And that debt is Generational theft and it's creating obstensively a new slavery class to pay it off.

LOL

Coming from a guy who advocates adding to the national debt to provide tax breaks to the wealthy

Damn! Beat me to it!

 

[rightwinger]

And that debt is Generational theft and it's creating obstensively a new slavery class to pay it off.

LOL

Coming from a guy who advocates adding to the national debt to provide tax breaks to the wealthy

Keep laughing sewer boy. Tax breaks do not add to debt. Government spending does shithead. Economics 101 shit for brains.

Politicians create the ******* DEBT with their spending. And they're spending us and future generations into slavery just to pay off their elaborate Socialist programs for those that refuse to work to even PAY taxes.

Wake the HELL up...

Even down in the sewer we know that taxes equate to money in....while spending equates to money out

If you cut back on the money in and do not cut the money out.....you have a deficit

BOTH additional spending AND decreased tax revenue add to the deficit

 

[daveman]

You do know that non-profits make money, don't you?

Dumbass.

"...don't claim that making money isn't profit."

Dumbass.

Wow - you really are clueless about the real world. Probably from spending your adult life closed up in an AF office, secure in the knowledge that your job and your pension and your health care, etc., etc., etc. are taking care of by Nanny Government.

Non-profits make money. They are not allowed to make a profit. Now go get some businessman to explain that to you.

Yet another leftist retard who doesn't think words have concrete meanings.

Actually...yet another leftist retard who doesn't think.

 

[daveman]

See daveman about that. He's the expert.


Oh, wait...I read that wrong. I thought you said 'punch in without working'.

12 broken aircraft worth a half-billion dollars safely stopped by aircraft arresting gear I maintained and certified, manned by 18 priceless aircrew. Now I manage a fleet of equipment worth a billion dollars.

All without ever leaving your computer chair!

It's tough to get out on the runway and maintain this equipment while being in an office:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W0olVhjP_c]YouTube - Stopping Aircraft Safely for over 50 Years![/ame]

But please, by all means, continue displaying your ignorance of all things military. Dumbass.

Say, how are those Kenny G cover tunes coming? You've got a wedding reception coming up, right?

 

[daveman]

LOL

Coming from a guy who advocates adding to the national debt to provide tax breaks to the wealthy

Keep laughing sewer boy. Tax breaks do not add to debt. Government spending does shithead. Economics 101 shit for brains.

Politicians create the ******* DEBT with their spending. And they're spending us and future generations into slavery just to pay off their elaborate Socialist programs for those that refuse to work to even PAY taxes.

Wake the HELL up...

Even down in the sewer we know that taxes equate to money in....while spending equates to money out

If you cut back on the money in and do not cut the money out.....you have a deficit

BOTH additional spending AND decreased tax revenue add to the deficit

Exactly. So why doesn't the left ever want to decrease spending?

 

[Synthaholic]

12 broken aircraft worth a half-billion dollars safely stopped by aircraft arresting gear I maintained and certified, manned by 18 priceless aircrew. Now I manage a fleet of equipment worth a billion dollars.

All without ever leaving your computer chair!

It's tough to get out on the runway and maintain this equipment while being in an office:

Yet, you are always here, online, and posting. And who knows how many other forums, all while collecting that 'work' check.

 

[rightwinger]

Keep laughing sewer boy. Tax breaks do not add to debt. Government spending does shithead. Economics 101 shit for brains.

Politicians create the ******* DEBT with their spending. And they're spending us and future generations into slavery just to pay off their elaborate Socialist programs for those that refuse to work to even PAY taxes.

Wake the HELL up...

Even down in the sewer we know that taxes equate to money in....while spending equates to money out

If you cut back on the money in and do not cut the money out.....you have a deficit

BOTH additional spending AND decreased tax revenue add to the deficit

Exactly. So why doesn't the left ever want to decrease spending?

Who says we don't?

But like with the right, the issue is what spending gets decreased. Fact is that neither the left nor the right has a history of decreasing spending. If the Tea Party were to get into power, they would not decrease spending either.

 

[KissMy]

Even down in the sewer we know that taxes equate to money in....while spending equates to money out

If you cut back on the money in and do not cut the money out.....you have a deficit

BOTH additional spending AND decreased tax revenue add to the deficit

Exactly. So why doesn't the left ever want to decrease spending?

Who says we don't?

But like with the right, the issue is what spending gets decreased. Fact is that neither the left nor the right has a history of decreasing spending. If the Tea Party were to get into power, they would not decrease spending either.

Bullshit! The Tea Party is more aligned with Ron Paul style of governing. He always votes against pork & to slash spending.

 

[drsmith1072]

Keep laughing sewer boy. Tax breaks do not add to debt. Government spending does shithead. Economics 101 shit for brains.

Politicians create the ******* DEBT with their spending. And they're spending us and future generations into slavery just to pay off their elaborate Socialist programs for those that refuse to work to even PAY taxes.

Wake the HELL up...

Even down in the sewer we know that taxes equate to money in....while spending equates to money out

If you cut back on the money in and do not cut the money out.....you have a deficit

BOTH additional spending AND decreased tax revenue add to the deficit

Exactly. So why doesn't the left ever want to decrease spending?

On that note why didn't the right decrease spending when they had the chance to do so??

However, rightwinger is correct. It's a little hard for any honest person to whine about the deficit when policies they support contribute to the deficit.

 

[Urkie]

However, rightwinger is correct. It's a little hard for any honest person to whine about the deficit when policies they support contribute to the deficit.

Yep, it's hypocrisy at it's finest when a Republican whines about the deficit. Yet, they'll whine when somebody wants to raise taxes so the debt doesn't grow as fast.

 

[rightwinger]

Exactly. So why doesn't the left ever want to decrease spending?

Who says we don't?

But like with the right, the issue is what spending gets decreased. Fact is that neither the left nor the right has a history of decreasing spending. If the Tea Party were to get into power, they would not decrease spending either.

Bullshit! The Tea Party is more aligned with Ron Paul style of governing. He always votes against pork & to slash spending.

Mark my word..

Tea party is still made up of politicians. Once they get in power politicians spend money....that is how they stay in power

 

[drsmith1072]

Exactly. So why doesn't the left ever want to decrease spending?

Who says we don't?

But like with the right, the issue is what spending gets decreased. Fact is that neither the left nor the right has a history of decreasing spending. If the Tea Party were to get into power, they would not decrease spending either.

Bullshit! The Tea Party is more aligned with Ron Paul style of governing. He always votes against pork & to slash spending.

Uh so they would vote against the bills claiming they are against the earmarks even as they take the money that comes from the earmarks that they claimed to be against??

It's kind of like being against the bridge to nowhere, after you were for it and then you end up taking the money anyway even though you still claim you are against it. LOL

 

[daveman]

All without ever leaving your computer chair!

It's tough to get out on the runway and maintain this equipment while being in an office:

Yet, you are always here, online, and posting. And who knows how many other forums, all while collecting that 'work' check.

It's funny how you keep deleting references to your occupation from my posts, Mullet Boi. Although I understand your desperate need to flap the shreds of your ego.

How many lives have you saved?

 

[daveman]

Even down in the sewer we know that taxes equate to money in....while spending equates to money out

If you cut back on the money in and do not cut the money out.....you have a deficit

BOTH additional spending AND decreased tax revenue add to the deficit

Exactly. So why doesn't the left ever want to decrease spending?

Who says we don't?

But like with the right, the issue is what spending gets decreased. Fact is that neither the left nor the right has a history of decreasing spending. If the Tea Party were to get into power, they would not decrease spending either.

Guess we'll find out, won't we?