For a hoax, global warming is a pretty effective destructor

Where/when is Earth closest to Sun during elliptical orbit?

Your claim was warmer = higher surface air pressure.

Why are you changing your claim?



So you are DISPUTING the "hypothesis" that "closer to Sun" = warmer?
 
Good grief dude, get a grip... you don't look at the data and evidence of fraud (yes, I call it fraud), you just launch into ad hominem attacks - at least you're consistent.

The man works for North Dakota State, which is what I meant to say, but spliced two sentences together and didn't proof read it well enough.

As for science, it is you who doesn't understand that the feedbacks are negative.

That being the case, the theory of CO2 caused climate calamity falls apart right there - that is what the data and real world observations tell us.

There is much still to learn on these subjects - but that process is hindered by those who oppress the scientific community with the religious orthodoxy that is fossil fuel hysteria.

These people are grifting through Billions of dollars, so i don't expect the fraud train to stop any time soon.

In the mean time, you'll continue to be their "Useful Idiot", like so many other hapless activists.

Still no citations ... is this person at North Dakota State too embarrassed? ...

The sad part is I'm refuting climate change ... with math AND science ... radiative physics to be exact ... have you ever heard of Stefan-Boltzmann's Law ... it states that irradiation is proportional to temperature raised to the fourth power ...

Apparently not ... I can see why "useful idiot" is so quick to your lips ... and you're math isn't good enough to understand what I posted above ...

ETA: Did you really agree with EHM and his surface pressure nonsense? ... I can see now whose "useful idiot" you believe in ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...
 
I'm disputing your stupid claim,
"Surface Air Pressure goes up when a planet's temperature goes up".

DURR


So are you disputing the data from Mars which shows Martian SAP rises the closer Mars gets to Sun, or are you disputing

closer to Sun = "warmer?"


Seasonal variation of Mars' global mean surface pressure at five ...


Terraforming Mars - USC Viterbi School of Engineering


 
I'm refuting climate change


LOL!!!

Climate change is a science.

Global Warming is a fraud that is 100% refuted and was 25 years ago... and you are part of Global Warming FRAUD as a taxpayer funded "faux skeptic"
 
So are you disputing the data from Mars which shows Martian SAP rises the closer Mars gets to Sun, or are you disputing

closer to Sun = "warmer?"


Seasonal variation of Mars' global mean surface pressure at five ...' global mean surface pressure at five ...


Terraforming Mars - USC Viterbi School of Engineering



I'm disputing your stupid claim,
Surface Air Pressure (on Earth) goes up when the temperature (on Earth) goes up.
 
Still no citations ... is this person at North Dakota State too embarrassed? ...

The sad part is I'm refuting climate change ... with math AND science ... radiative physics to be exact ... have you ever heard of Stefan-Boltzmann's Law ... it states that irradiation is proportional to temperature raised to the fourth power ...

Apparently not ... I can see why "useful idiot" is so quick to your lips ... and you're math isn't good enough to understand what I posted above ...

ETA: Did you really agree with EHM and his surface pressure nonsense? ... I can see now whose "useful idiot" you believe in ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...
He shows the graph right there in the link I provided.

Of course you refuse to watch it, so you continue to comment on something for which you have no understanding.

You're intellectually dishonest.
 
I'm disputing your stupid claim,
Surface Air Pressure (on Earth) goes up when the temperature (on Earth) goes up.



During the Jurassic Period, the Earth’s climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today.





Jurassic surface air pressure was likely higher than today's, possibly ranging from 8 to 10 bar (8 to 10 times current pressure) or a total pressure of 3.7 to 5.0 bar
 
Still no citations ... is this person at North Dakota State too embarrassed? ...

The sad part is I'm refuting climate change ... with math AND science ... radiative physics to be exact ... have you ever heard of Stefan-Boltzmann's Law ... it states that irradiation is proportional to temperature raised to the fourth power ...

Apparently not ... I can see why "useful idiot" is so quick to your lips ... and you're math isn't good enough to understand what I posted above ...

ETA: Did you really agree with EHM and his surface pressure nonsense? ... I can see now whose "useful idiot" you believe in ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...
Princeton Physicist and MIT Atmospheric Sciences Professor Emeritus Richard Lindzen on Joe Rogan recently.



 
Princeton Physicist and MIT Atmospheric Sciences Professor Emeritus Richard Lindzen on Joe Rogan recently.







Lindzen is another not to trust fully. Lindzen was "on the taxpayer dole" and "agrees there is warming" just like all of our resident "faux skeptics."

The real truth is back up at the top of Environment section, since CO2 does nothing...
 
Still no citations ... is this person at North Dakota State too embarrassed? ...

The sad part is I'm refuting climate change ... with math AND science ... radiative physics to be exact ... have you ever heard of Stefan-Boltzmann's Law ... it states that irradiation is proportional to temperature raised to the fourth power ...

Apparently not ... I can see why "useful idiot" is so quick to your lips ... and you're math isn't good enough to understand what I posted above ...

ETA: Did you really agree with EHM and his surface pressure nonsense? ... I can see now whose "useful idiot" you believe in ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...
This one of my favorite lectures from Lindzen in which he explains the physics.

As I said, and all honest scientists understand, the feedbacks are negative.

 


During the Jurassic Period, the Earth’s climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today.





Jurassic surface air pressure was likely higher than today's, possibly ranging from 8 to 10 bar (8 to 10 times current pressure) or a total pressure of 3.7 to 5.0 bar


During the Jurassic Period, the Earth’s climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today.

Jurassic surface air pressure was likely higher than today's, possibly ranging from 8 to 10 bar (8 to 10 times current pressure)


Awesome!

Now post data from the last year that shows when the temperature in any location (every location!) is higher that the surface air pressure in that location is higher.
 
During the Jurassic Period, the Earth’s climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today.

Jurassic surface air pressure was likely higher than today's, possibly ranging from 8 to 10 bar (8 to 10 times current pressure)


Awesome!

Now post data from the last year that shows when the temperature in any location (every location!) is higher that the surface air pressure in that location is higher.



CO2 FRAUD's only "hope" here is to take a planetary measure, Surface Air Pressure, and make it about local weather, like the eye of a hurricane.

The bottom line is that Earth does have a slightly elliptical orbit and when closest to Sun in January has a slight uptick in Surface Air Pressure, downtick in July for the same reason.

Mars, of course, has a much more elliptical orbit, and makes the proof quite clear

WHEN A PLANET WITH AN ATMOSPHERE WARMS, SURFACE AIR PRESSURE INCREASES

BECAUSE AIR PRESSURE IS CORRELATED WITH TEMPERATURE IN EVERY INSTANCE




Seasonal variation of Mars' global mean surface pressure at five ...


Terraforming Mars - USC Viterbi School of Engineering





Mars SAP fluctuation is really 100% about distance from Sun. There is a difference between Earth and Mars, CO2 vs H2O polar caps. But the ice cap issue is the same, since the ice on both poles on Earth is packed with compressed gas, and releasing that gas is what caused Jurassic's 3-5 fold increase in SAP. Except Earth's orbit doesn't release that gas, the movement of the tectonic plates does that...
 
CO2 FRAUD's only "hope" here is to take a planetary measure, Surface Air Pressure, and make it about local weather, like the eye of a hurricane.

The bottom line is that Earth does have a slightly elliptical orbit and when closest to Sun in January has a slight uptick in Surface Air Pressure, downtick in July for the same reason.

Mars, of course, has a much more elliptical orbit, and makes the proof quite clear

WHEN A PLANET WITH AN ATMOSPHERE WARMS, SURFACE AIR PRESSURE INCREASES

BECAUSE AIR PRESSURE IS CORRELATED WITH TEMPERATURE IN EVERY INSTANCE




Seasonal variation of Mars' global mean surface pressure at five ...' global mean surface pressure at five ...


Terraforming Mars - USC Viterbi School of Engineering





Mars SAP fluctuation is really 100% about distance from Sun. There is a difference between Earth and Mars, CO2 vs H2O polar caps. But the ice cap issue is the same, since the ice on both poles on Earth is packed with compressed gas, and releasing that gas is what caused Jurassic's 3-5 fold increase in SAP. Except Earth's orbit doesn't release that gas, the movement of the tectonic plates does that...

take a planetary measure, Surface Air Pressure, and make it about local weather, like the eye of a hurricane.

Since all surface pressure is measured locally, of course it's local, you stupid ****.

Take a spot on Earth, measure every daily temperature and SAP at the same time.

Look at the highest temperature readings, the SAP will be lowest.

Look at the lowest temperature readings, the SAP will be highest.

Only a total moron like you will see all those data points and come to
the conclusion that higher temperatures result in higher SAP readings.

But you're a total moron, so that's what you do.
 
Look at the highest temperature readings, the SAP will be lowest.

Look at the lowest temperature readings, the SAP will be highest.


bullshit, go ask WU to fudge something and hope the FBI isn't watching...
 
bullshit, go ask WU to fudge something and hope the FBI isn't watching...

Stop whining about WU and post data from a reliable source.

Then you can explain why the facts are as I said, not as you said.

Or keep whining, ****.
 
15th post
Stop whining about WU and post data from a reliable source.

Then you can explain why the facts are as I said, not as you said.

Or keep whining, ****.


I have all the data I need.

Pluto, Mars, and Earth all experience higher SAP when closer to Sun.

You have ZERO planets to the contrary....
 
Earth data, you whiny ****.


Earth SAP has a fluctuation of about 2% in total from a slightly elliptical orbit, SAP is about 2% higher in January than July.

Earth SAP skyrockets when there is little to no land near the poles and hence little to no ice. Earth today has 9 million cubic miles of ice, and inside that is enough gas to get SAP up to where it was during Jurassic, 3-5 times higher than now.


You have NO DATA AT ALL to the contrary... but you did try twice to get WU to fudge data for you....


 
Earth SAP has a fluctuation of about 2% in total from a slightly elliptical orbit, SAP is about 2% higher in January than July.

Earth SAP skyrockets when there is little to no land near the poles and hence little to no ice. Earth today has 9 million cubic miles of ice, and inside that is enough gas to get SAP up to where it was during Jurassic, 3-5 times higher than now.


You have NO DATA AT ALL to the contrary... but you did try twice to get WU to fudge data for you....



Earth SAP has a fluctuation of about 2% in total from a slightly elliptical orbit, SAP is about 2% higher in January than July.

There is no "Earth SAP".
There are many local SAP measurements.
Many more in the northern hemisphere than in the southern hemisphere.

How many readings are you averaging to get your fictious "Earth SAP"?
What is their distribution?

Come on ****, get some reliable, unfudged data of your own.

Instead of just crying like a baby.
 
Back
Top Bottom