For a hoax, global warming is a pretty effective destructor

[CrusaderFrank]

NASA satellites show Antarctica has gained ice despite rising global temperatures. How is that possible?

 

[ReinyDays]

NOAA staff has been cut to the bone. Climate Science is all but empty. YOU have an outdated conspiracy theory. I live in state with a year round wild fire season. Drought persists in several parts of California. Hurricanes are stronger and last longer.

I asked for a citation .. you have none ... I asked about formal education ... you have none ... you just make stuff up as you go ... way to go, Bubba ...

Hurricanes in California ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

 

[Grumblenuts]

However, this isn't a sign that global warming and climate change have miraculously reversed. Picture a long ski slope with a small jump at the end. That's what a line through the Antarctic ice sheet data looks like when plotted on a graph. While there have been some recent ice gains, they don't even begin to make up for almost 20 years of losses.

Poorly worded title is all.

 

[Sunsettommy]

NOAA staff has been cut to the bone. Climate Science is all but empty. YOU have an outdated conspiracy theory. I live in state with a year round wild fire season. Drought persists in several parts of California. Hurricanes are stronger and last longer.

Then your 4 C warming claim was a lie on your part gee that doesn't help your...... credibility.

 

[EMH]

Poorly worded title is all.

Clearly, if "the ice was melting"

1. oceans would rise
2. surface air pressure would rise


and neither 1 or 2 is happening....

 

[EMH]

NASA satellites show Antarctica has gained ice despite rising global temperatures. How is that possible?

Antarctica has gained ice every year for tens of millions of years, and the ice cores prove it.

 

[Oddball]

NOAA staff has been cut to the bone. Climate Science is all but empty. YOU have an outdated conspiracy theory. I live in state with a year round wild fire season. Drought persists in several parts of California.

Most of SoCal is the ******* desert....Droughts are the norm.

Hurricanes are stronger and last longer.

False.

 

[wist43]

NOAA is the science ... I also took a course in Atmospheric Science ... what college science courses have you taken? ...

I asked for a citation to back up your claim of 4ºC warming ... all I get is a Trumpazee flinging his poop ...

NOAA is not science - they are a government funded agency dedicated to producing predetermined results - fraudulent, manufactured results.

James Hanson was a laughing stock whose predictions of doom are in the rear view mirror and completely discredited.

An honest person would learn from the exposed fraud, but not you lot. You just keep plowing ahead with the fraud.

 

[wist43]

I asked for a citation .. you have none ... I asked about formal education ... you have none ... you just make stuff up as you go ... way to go, Bubba ...

Hurricanes in California ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

Here the head of North Dakota's state meteorological department - been in the position for over 30 years.

Says the NWS came in and "calibrated" the sensors for North Dakota's official temperature record, and in one day they jumped the daily readings up 3 degrees.

3 freaking degees!!!!

Now all you wing nuts will prance around and proclaim proof of warming!!!!!! ALARM, ALARM!!!!!!!

You leftists are soooooo dishonest... it's disgusting

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Here the head of North Dakota's state meteorological department - been in the position for over 30 years.

Says the NWS came in and "calibrated" the sensors for North Dakota's official temperature record, and in one day they jumped the daily readings up 3 degrees.

3 freaking degees!!!!

Now all you wing nuts will prance around and proclaim proof of warming!!!!!! ALARM, ALARM!!!!!!!

You leftists are soooooo dishonest... it's disgusting

97% of scientists agree it was 3 degrees warmer than the thermometers showed.

 

[wist43]

97% of scientists agree it was 3 degrees warmer than the thermometers showed.

So they made it so...

Lather, rinse, repeat.

 

[EMH]

Here the head of North Dakota's state meteorological department - been in the position for over 30 years.

Says the NWS came in and "calibrated" the sensors for North Dakota's official temperature record, and in one day they jumped the daily readings up 3 degrees.

3 freaking degees!!!!

Now all you wing nuts will prance around and proclaim proof of warming!!!!!! ALARM, ALARM!!!!!!!

You leftists are soooooo dishonest... it's disgusting

There is always a "need" to "correct" data showing NO WARMING...

 

[ReinyDays]

Here the head of North Dakota's state meteorological department - been in the position for over 30 years.

Says the NWS came in and "calibrated" the sensors for North Dakota's official temperature record, and in one day they jumped the daily readings up 3 degrees.

3 freaking degees!!!!

Now all you wing nuts will prance around and proclaim proof of warming!!!!!! ALARM, ALARM!!!!!!!

You leftists are soooooo dishonest... it's disgusting

North Dakota State Meteorological Agency isn't science either ... it's more government ...

YOU don't understand the science ... that's why you're so easily fooled ... one degree doesn't change weather, so it doesn't change climate ... you're so confused, you think I'm advocating the CCC rhetoric ... makes you look the fool ...

So where is your "scientific" citation for average global temperatures? ...

ETA: Oh ... there's no such thing as the "North Dakota State Meteorological Agency" ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... blind fool you are ... it's called the North Dakota Agricultural Weather Network run by NDSU ... too funny ... 103.8% of all imaginary weather offices agree we're fucked ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

​

 

[wist43]

North Dakota State Meteorological Agency isn't science either ... it's more government ...

YOU don't understand the science ... that's why you're so easily fooled ... one degree doesn't change weather, so it doesn't change climate ... you're so confused, you think I'm advocating the CCC rhetoric ... makes you look the fool ...

So where is your "scientific" citation for average global temperatures? ...

ETA: Oh ... there's no such thing as the "North Dakota State Meteorological Agency" ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... blind fool you are ... it's called the North Dakota Agricultural Weather Network run by NDSU ... too funny ... 103.8% of all imaginary weather offices agree we're fucked ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

​

Good grief dude, get a grip... you don't look at the data and evidence of fraud (yes, I call it fraud), you just launch into ad hominem attacks - at least you're consistent.

The man works for North Dakota State, which is what I meant to say, but spliced two sentences together and didn't proof read it well enough.

As for science, it is you who doesn't understand that the feedbacks are negative.

That being the case, the theory of CO2 caused climate calamity falls apart right there - that is what the data and real world observations tell us.

There is much still to learn on these subjects - but that process is hindered by those who oppress the scientific community with the religious orthodoxy that is fossil fuel hysteria.

These people are grifting through Billions of dollars, so i don't expect the fraud train to stop any time soon.

In the mean time, you'll continue to be their "Useful Idiot", like so many other hapless activists.

 

[EMH]

So where is your "scientific" citation for average global temperatures?

The best indicator of a change in global atmospheric temperature is Surface Air Pressure, which is truly a global measure no matter where it is taken.

Surface Air Pressure goes up when a planet's temperature goes up, see Mars.

Surface Air Pressure has not risen at all on Earth, proving


1. EARTH is not warming
2. EARTH is experiencing precisely ZERO ongoing net ice melt

 

[EMH]

Good grief dude, get a grip... you don't look at the data and evidence of fraud (yes, I call it fraud), you just launch into ad hominem attacks - at least you're consistent.

The man works for North Dakota State, which is what I meant to say, but spliced two sentences together and didn't proof read it well enough.

As for science, it is you who doesn't understand that the feedbacks are negative.

That being the case, the theory of CO2 caused climate calamity falls apart right there - that is what the data and real world observations tell us.

There is much still to learn on these subjects - but that process is hindered by those who oppress the scientific community with the religious orthodoxy that is fossil fuel hysteria.

These people are grifting through Billions of dollars, so i don't expect the fraud train to stop any time soon.

In the mean time, you'll continue to be their "Useful Idiot", like so many other hapless activists.

You are attempting to rationally discuss CO2 FRAUD with a taxpayer funded card carrying CO2 FRAUD "Faux Skeptic" who's job is to pretend to be a skeptic while insisting the "warming" is real...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The best indicator of a change in global atmospheric temperature is Surface Air Pressure, which is truly a global measure no matter where it is taken.

Surface Air Pressure goes up when a planet's temperature goes up, see Mars.

Surface Air Pressure has not risen at all on Earth, proving


1. EARTH is not warming
2. EARTH is experiencing precisely ZERO ongoing net ice melt

Show where surface air pressure on Earth goes up when temperature goes up.

Use Earth.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Good grief dude, get a grip... you don't look at the data and evidence of fraud (yes, I call it fraud), you just launch into ad hominem attacks - at least you're consistent.

The man works for North Dakota State, which is what I meant to say, but spliced two sentences together and didn't proof read it well enough.

As for science, it is you who doesn't understand that the feedbacks are negative.

That being the case, the theory of CO2 caused climate calamity falls apart right there - that is what the data and real world observations tell us.

There is much still to learn on these subjects - but that process is hindered by those who oppress the scientific community with the religious orthodoxy that is fossil fuel hysteria.

These people are grifting through Billions of dollars, so i don't expect the fraud train to stop any time soon.

In the mean time, you'll continue to be their "Useful Idiot", like so many other hapless activists.

one degree doesn't change weather, so it doesn't change climate ... you're so confused

This is him, refuting the useful idiots.

DURR.

 

[EMH]

Show where surface air pressure on Earth goes up when temperature goes up.

Use Earth.

Where/when is Earth closest to Sun during elliptical orbit?

Because we know that Mars SAP is highest when closest to Sun, and you and CO2 FRAUD cannot explain why Earth would be different... except by having WU fudge data again...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Where/when is Earth closest to Sun during elliptical orbit?

Because we know that Mars SAP is highest when closest to Sun, and you and CO2 FRAUD cannot explain why Earth would be different... except by having WU fudge data again...

Where/when is Earth closest to Sun during elliptical orbit?

Your claim was warmer = higher surface air pressure.

Why are you changing your claim?

Feel free to post data from the northern hemisphere.