Floyd verdict thread (moments away)

[$ecular#eckler]

 

[pknopp]

But that would be a part of the appeal process.

Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of that was detrimental to their client.

If you're the accused, that's what you want.

Absolutely. It was really stupid of her to add to that.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

So, will they celebrate by burning businesses to the ground or will they protest by burning businesses to the ground?

 

[marvin martian]

There can be only be one verdict, and it will be appealed thanks to dingbat Waters.

Yea, she was really stupid - HOWEVER, the appeal will be denied same as it was yesterday unless we can determine that one or more jurors broke their oath to avoid news while in their hotel rooms equipped with nothing but TVs and DVRs.

No appeal was denied yesterday, dipshit. You can't appeal a decision before it's announced. Damn you're stupid.

Yes it was you fucking idiot. Appeal to dismiss - DENIED ... STOOPID

It's a motion to dismiss, dipshit. Appeals happen AFTER the decision. Damn, just admit you're stupid and let's move on.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

So, will they celebrate by burning businesses to the ground or will they protest by burning businesses to the ground?

EXCELLENT NEWS!!!!!!!!!!

 

[bendog]

Do you have your cache of bricks ready for the riot?

I stocked up on Campbell soups.

Wait for the riots and bypass the Booze, TVs and Stereo aisles and go straight for old whitey soup! I'm partial to the vegetable myself. Tomato with milk is always good. Chedder melts nicely in it. Though Krogers makes a passable knock off of chicken noodle.

 

[Meathead]

But that would be a part of the appeal process.

Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of, was detrimental to their client.

If you're the accused, that's what you want.

No, if you are the accused you want a not guilty verdict, but if you're found guilty in this case you're still sitting pretty.

 

[pknopp]

But that would be a part of the appeal process.

Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of, was detrimental to their client.

If you're the accused, that's what you want.

No, if you are the accused you want a not guilty verdict, but if you're found guilty in this case you're still sitting pretty.

I don't think I would want to be sitting where I had to rely on a long appeal process.

 

[the other mike]

"Oh. This is so upsetting Andy ...I'm breakin' out in hives !"

 

[d0gbreath]

campbell?

I figured you for a Progresso type.

The brand isn't important. I get the family size chunky cans so I can slip a hand grenade inside. You should see the looks of surprise!

 

[Flash]

I hope the jury found him not guilty and awarded him $10M for pain and suffering, payable by George Floyd's family.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

This soon should be excellent news for the prosecution but we shall see!

April 20,2021 Derek Chauvin trial verdict

Former Minneapolis Police officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty of murder and manslaughter in the death of George Floyd. Follow here for live updates and analysis.

www.cnn.com

Biden and Watters have compromised the jury. Sadly.

 

[Turtlesoup]

I have always heard that a return this quick is not good for the defense. We will see if that holds true here.

Quick verdicts mean in shorter trials that the jury went in with their minds made up (not likely all would have) or that instead of emotions that they based their verdict on evidence giving them confidence in their verdict. Despite the lib medias glowing reviews and twisting of testimony----from what I understand the one defense attorney kicked the idiot communist prosecutors asses all day long most every day in court. Chances are good for Chauvin---no more than 2nd and it will be appealled with the murders 1 and 2 not allowed to be considered---and chauvin is released because biden and walters have just made any conviction NULL and void due to witness tampering and Threatening. The judge can now immediately rule a verdict invalid ...Walters should have criminal charges. The jury has a good chance to declare innocent.

No matter what the twin cities burn-----go Socialists and communist. Black activists show the world how awful and evil you are.

 

[blackhawk]

So we will either have riots to protest not getting the verdict they wanted or we will have riots to celebrate getting the verdict they wanted.

 

[Meathead]

But that would be a part of the appeal process.

Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of, was detrimental to their client.

If you're the accused, that's what you want.

No, if you are the accused you want a not guilty verdict, but if you're found guilty in this case you're still sitting pretty.

I don't think I would want to be sitting where I had to rely on a long appeal process.

No, but it's not a shot-in-the-dark appeal process. It's a given.

 

[excalibur]

Got to be guilty on something, no way they would have deliberated this fast unless early guilty.

They've been doxxed and this proves it works.

More and more this appears to be 1789.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

The verdict on Floyd is in. He be dead, dead dead.

 

[Flash]

That stupid hateful Maxine Waters said if it's not First Degree murder then she wants rioting

Too bad First Degree was not a charge

 

[pknopp]

But that would be a part of the appeal process.

Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of, was detrimental to their client.

If you're the accused, that's what you want.

No, if you are the accused you want a not guilty verdict, but if you're found guilty in this case you're still sitting pretty.

I don't think I would want to be sitting where I had to rely on a long appeal process.

No, but it's not a shot-in-the-dark appeal process. It's a given.

As I noted, if found guilty they will appeal regardless. Michael Slager just had his appeal denied and he was sentenced in 2017.

 

[Flash]

The fate of every US downtown, the mental wellbeing of 100 million shitlibs, property in the tens of billions -- It all hinges on exactly How racist Is this black Ghanaian immigrant juror.
— Gianni, DDS (@AngloRemnant) April 20, 2021