Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of that was detrimental to their client.But that would be a part of the appeal process.
If you're the accused, that's what you want.
There can be only be one verdict, and it will be appealed thanks to dingbat Waters.
Yea, she was really stupid - HOWEVER, the appeal will be denied same as it was yesterday unless we can determine that one or more jurors broke their oath to avoid news while in their hotel rooms equipped with nothing but TVs and DVRs.
No appeal was denied yesterday, dipshit. You can't appeal a decision before it's announced. Damn you're stupid.
Yes it was you fucking idiot. Appeal to dismiss - DENIED ... STOOPID
EXCELLENT NEWS!!!!!!!!!!So, will they celebrate by burning businesses to the ground or will they protest by burning businesses to the ground?
Wait for the riots and bypass the Booze, TVs and Stereo aisles and go straight for old whitey soup! I'm partial to the vegetable myself. Tomato with milk is always good. Chedder melts nicely in it. Though Krogers makes a passable knock off of chicken noodle.I stocked up on Campbell soups.Do you have your cache of bricks ready for the riot?
No, if you are the accused you want a not guilty verdict, but if you're found guilty in this case you're still sitting pretty.Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of, was detrimental to their client.But that would be a part of the appeal process.
If you're the accused, that's what you want.
No, if you are the accused you want a not guilty verdict, but if you're found guilty in this case you're still sitting pretty.Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of, was detrimental to their client.But that would be a part of the appeal process.
If you're the accused, that's what you want.
The brand isn't important. I get the family size chunky cans so I can slip a hand grenade inside. You should see the looks of surprise!campbell?
I figured you for a Progresso type.
Biden and Watters have compromised the jury. Sadly.This soon should be excellent news for the prosecution but we shall see!
April 20,2021 Derek Chauvin trial verdict
Former Minneapolis Police officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty of murder and manslaughter in the death of George Floyd. Follow here for live updates and analysis.www.cnn.com
Quick verdicts mean in shorter trials that the jury went in with their minds made up (not likely all would have) or that instead of emotions that they based their verdict on evidence giving them confidence in their verdict. Despite the lib medias glowing reviews and twisting of testimony----from what I understand the one defense attorney kicked the idiot communist prosecutors asses all day long most every day in court. Chances are good for Chauvin---no more than 2nd and it will be appealled with the murders 1 and 2 not allowed to be considered---and chauvin is released because biden and walters have just made any conviction NULL and void due to witness tampering and Threatening. The judge can now immediately rule a verdict invalid ...Walters should have criminal charges. The jury has a good chance to declare innocent.I have always heard that a return this quick is not good for the defense. We will see if that holds true here.
No, but it's not a shot-in-the-dark appeal process. It's a given.No, if you are the accused you want a not guilty verdict, but if you're found guilty in this case you're still sitting pretty.Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of, was detrimental to their client.But that would be a part of the appeal process.
If you're the accused, that's what you want.
I don't think I would want to be sitting where I had to rely on a long appeal process.
Got to be guilty on something, no way they would have deliberated this fast unless early guilty.
No, but it's not a shot-in-the-dark appeal process. It's a given.No, if you are the accused you want a not guilty verdict, but if you're found guilty in this case you're still sitting pretty.Yes, it would. There would be no other reason to ask them that question. I'm sure that the defense will have a stack of complaints starting with no change of venue, winding it's way through everything that the judge stated that irked them, and progressing into how totally unfair everything that they can think of, was detrimental to their client.But that would be a part of the appeal process.
If you're the accused, that's what you want.
I don't think I would want to be sitting where I had to rely on a long appeal process.