Florist Sued for Refusing Service to Gay Couple Pens Defiant Letter Rejecting Gov’t Settlement Offer

[bodecea]

Amazing how you continue with that revisionist history.

You mean that I fail to recite the revisionism of your party, assclown?

Keep going with your digging. It's fun to watch you put your revisionist history all down for us to read.

 

[TemplarKormac]

However, it leaned Goldwater and opposed the civil rights acts.

Barry Goldwater supported every Civil Rights act up until the 1964 version. And he didn't oppose the the 1964 version on racist grounds, but purely on states rights grounds. He believed it infringed on the right of businesses to serve whomever they chose.

 

[Katzndogz]

[

She can do pretty much whatever she likes in church, but businesses are required to follow Man's laws, not God's.

But you left out the part about the Bill of Rights protecting the right of the people to have freedom of religion and that right is not restricted to within the walls of a church.

You Libtard are always confused about things like this, aren't you?

Show us the part of her religion where she gets to lie about following the business laws she signed up for.

She followed all the laws. This was a long time customer of nine years. Certainly if she refused to sell them flowers it would have been an issue before now.

The judge disagreed.

That's why there is a good chance that this decision will be overturned. It addressed the issue as one in which the florist refused all service. That was not the case.

Without reaching any religious argument the woman should have an absolute right to artistic freedom. The right of an artist to create or not create belongs to the artist alone.

Otherwise we are one step away from putting artists in prison for their art. We are no better than those who kill cartoonists.

 

[TemplarKormac]

it's her business.

Then why is it anyone else's?

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, all you brains out there? Lets not forget Obama and Hobby Lobby!!!

 

[bodecea]

Only a truly ignorant fool would not know the Democrats of the 50s and 60s who opposed the civil rights movement were right wingers.

The Democrats and Republicans who opposed the civil rights movement back then referred to themselves as

the Conservative Coalition.

Don't tell Uncensored that...it doesn't fit his revisionism.

 

[bodecea]

She's not a dying breed, we're going to see this more and more.

Christians aren't going to participate in sacrilege. It's where they draw the line.

Christians already are participating, or are they not really Christians if they do?

That's where they get the chance to say who is and who is not a "real" Christian...........again.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

She's not a dying breed, we're going to see this more and more.

Christians aren't going to participate in sacrilege. It's where they draw the line.

Christians already are participating, or are they not really Christians if they do?

That's where they get the chance to say who is and who is not a "real" Christian...........again.

I can't wait. I always love that part.

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, bet the old lady wins?

"GTP"

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yo, bet the old lady wins?

"GTP"

She's already lost, like the others, they were just trying to give her the cheap way out and she was too stupid to take it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Keep going with your digging. It's fun to watch you put your revisionist history all down for us to read.

I realize that the owner of the democratic party, George Soros, has programmed you drones with a big lie meme that the Dixicrats were all right wing, as your fellow leftist Jake5000 has been spewing. The Soros line is sort of;

"segregationist democrats were right wing!"

Really? What made them right wing?

"they were right wing because they were segregationist."

Circular reasoning defines the big lie attempt.

Sorry, these New Deal democrats were progressives - just like you.

 

[bodecea]

Amazing how you continue with that revisionist history.

You mean that I fail to recite the revisionism of your party, assclown?

Poor Uncensored....

 

[Nosmo King]

it's her business.

Then why is it anyone else's?

If her business is open to the public, and the customers are wearing shirts and shoes and have payment in hand, her business must accommodate those customers. If she is discriminating against any customer on sectarian, racial, gender or any other immutable reason, she is breaking the law. Just as Woolworth's did just as Greyhound did, and just as every other Jim Crow business in the south did.

Is it right to make others feel less than in business transactions? Is there a reasonable rational for her actions?

Or is it just another way to make those who are different feel inferior just for kicks?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Amazing how you continue with that revisionist history.

You mean that I fail to recite the revisionism of your party, assclown?

Poor Uncensored....

Poor assclown shortbus, reduced to gibbering...

 

[bodecea]

Yo, bet the old lady wins?

"GTP"

She's already lost, like the others, they were just trying to give her the cheap way out and she was too stupid to take it.

FOX News is using her now. This will be fun.

 

[bodecea]

Amazing how you continue with that revisionist history.

You mean that I fail to recite the revisionism of your party, assclown?

Poor Uncensored....

Poor assclown shortbus, reduced to gibbering...

You should tell us more about how Liberals are the real Racists.

 

[Katzndogz]

it's her business.

Then why is it anyone else's?

If her business is open to the public, and the customers are wearing shirts and shoes and have payment in hand, her business must accommodate those customers. If she is discriminating against any customer on sectarian, racial, gender or any other immutable reason, she is breaking the law. Just as Woolworth's did just as Greyhound did, and just as every other Jim Crow business in the south did.

Is it right to make others feel less than in business transactions? Is there a reasonable rational for her actions?

Or is it just another way to make those who are different feel inferior just for kicks?

She didn't discriminate.

 

[Nosmo King]

it's her business.

Then why is it anyone else's?

If her business is open to the public, and the customers are wearing shirts and shoes and have payment in hand, her business must accommodate those customers. If she is discriminating against any customer on sectarian, racial, gender or any other immutable reason, she is breaking the law. Just as Woolworth's did just as Greyhound did, and just as every other Jim Crow business in the south did.

Is it right to make others feel less than in business transactions? Is there a reasonable rational for her actions?

Or is it just another way to make those who are different feel inferior just for kicks?

She didn't discriminate.

She agreed to arraign the flowers for the wedding?

 

[bodecea]

it's her business.

Then why is it anyone else's?

If her business is open to the public, and the customers are wearing shirts and shoes and have payment in hand, her business must accommodate those customers. If she is discriminating against any customer on sectarian, racial, gender or any other immutable reason, she is breaking the law. Just as Woolworth's did just as Greyhound did, and just as every other Jim Crow business in the south did.

Is it right to make others feel less than in business transactions? Is there a reasonable rational for her actions?

Or is it just another way to make those who are different feel inferior just for kicks?

She didn't discriminate.

The law disagrees.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If her business is open to the public, and the customers are wearing shirts and shoes and have payment in hand, her business must accommodate those customers. If she is discriminating against any customer on sectarian, racial, gender or any other immutable reason, she is breaking the law. Just as Woolworth's did just as Greyhound did, and just as every other Jim Crow business in the south did.

Is it right to make others feel less than in business transactions? Is there a reasonable rational for her actions?

Or is it just another way to make those who are different feel inferior just for kicks?

Gay is a race!

Brilliant Comrade.

Here is the new hymn of the party:

Barack loves the little children
Most of the children of the world
Red and gay and black but not white
They are precious in his sight
Barack loves the children of the world