Florist Sued for Refusing Service to Gay Couple Pens Defiant Letter Rejecting Gov’t Settlement Offer

[Ravi]

Im not sure im into businesses serving people they dont want to .....by force of the government.

If theyre known bigots and enough people decide not to shop there as a result, theyll fail.

That all said, shes a despicable bigot. **** her

I agree completely. I think that discriminating against homosexuals should not only be legal, but protected!

The only catch is that they should have to post big signs by the entrance and include a clearly visible "non fine print" disclaimer in all their advertisements that they refuse to serve homosexuals.

But what if all business in their area did that? What if there was no business in their area who would do business with them?

Where would gay people shop? How would they get food to live? How would they have a place to live?

I guess their only option is to move to a place that doesn't discriminate against them. Why should a person have to leave their home, family, friends and job just so that someone will sell goods and services to them?

That's the problem with such an attitude. You're allowing business to force someone to starve to death or not have clothes or a roof over their heads.

And what about our constitution? It clearly says everyone is equal under the law. Do you now just want to trash the constitution to be able to starve people to death?

Then they would have to go into business themselves.

Christians aren't going to cater to sacrilegious ceremonies, and the homo lobby can't force them to. It isn't going to happen. They don't have a "constitutional right" to cake baked by Christians.

A court house wedding is by definition not religiously sacred.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Im not sure im into businesses serving people they dont want to .....by force of the government.

If theyre known bigots and enough people decide not to shop there as a result, theyll fail.

That all said, shes a despicable bigot. **** her

I agree completely. I think that discriminating against homosexuals should not only be legal, but protected!

The only catch is that they should have to post big signs by the entrance and include a clearly visible "non fine print" disclaimer in all their advertisements that they refuse to serve homosexuals.

But what if all business in their area did that? What if there was no business in their area who would do business with them?

Where would gay people shop? How would they get food to live? How would they have a place to live?

I guess their only option is to move to a place that doesn't discriminate against them. Why should a person have to leave their home, family, friends and job just so that someone will sell goods and services to them?

That's the problem with such an attitude. You're allowing business to force someone to starve to death or not have clothes or a roof over their heads.

And what about our constitution? It clearly says everyone is equal under the law. Do you now just want to trash the constitution to be able to starve people to death?

Then they would have to go into business themselves.

Christians aren't going to cater to sacrilegious ceremonies, and the homo lobby can't force them to. It isn't going to happen. They don't have a "constitutional right" to cake baked by Christians.

Do tell us of this Christian revolt? We are all very interested?

 

[koshergrl]

Im not sure im into businesses serving people they dont want to .....by force of the government.

If theyre known bigots and enough people decide not to shop there as a result, theyll fail.

That all said, shes a despicable bigot. **** her

I agree completely. I think that discriminating against homosexuals should not only be legal, but protected!

The only catch is that they should have to post big signs by the entrance and include a clearly visible "non fine print" disclaimer in all their advertisements that they refuse to serve homosexuals.

But what if all business in their area did that? What if there was no business in their area who would do business with them?

Where would gay people shop? How would they get food to live? How would they have a place to live?

I guess their only option is to move to a place that doesn't discriminate against them. Why should a person have to leave their home, family, friends and job just so that someone will sell goods and services to them?

That's the problem with such an attitude. You're allowing business to force someone to starve to death or not have clothes or a roof over their heads.

And what about our constitution? It clearly says everyone is equal under the law. Do you now just want to trash the constitution to be able to starve people to death?

Then they would have to go into business themselves.

Christians aren't going to cater to sacrilegious ceremonies, and the homo lobby can't force them to. It isn't going to happen. They don't have a "constitutional right" to cake baked by Christians.

A court house wedding is by definition not religiously sacred.

Marriage is a sacrament, regardless of who or where it's performed.

And you can't force people to participate in disgusting acts of ritual sacrilege.

 

[TemplarKormac]

There was only ONE southern Republican who voted against the bill in the South

Right, right, as long as you don't count the other 10 Southern Republicans who voted against it!

Let's evaluate that claim.

First, the Senate makeup of the South beginning with the 88th Congress (1963):

Every state, who belonged to the defunct Confederacy, had both of their senate seats occupied by a Democrat. The exception was Texas.

Second, pertaining to your claim of "10 Republicans voting against" the Civil Rights Act. Those 10 Republicans were House Republicans, out of 177 Republican House members.

This is the composition of the South as it pertained to the House, and legislative plurality in those states beginning with the 88th Congress:

Legend:

Blue: 80.1-100% Democratic

Sky Blue: 60.1-80% Democratic

Aquamarine: ≤60% Democratic

Red: 80.1-100% Republican

Light Red: 60.1-80% Republican

Pink: ≤60% Republican

This is the lie you tell, g5, Boo.

So, the argument stands: Democrats are Democrats no matter where they came from or who they were in the past.

 

[bodecea]

Just like the cake shop, this florist shop has broken the state anti-discrimination law,w.

...and the law is wrong like many other laws. That doesn't excuse the fact that the State took the religious rights away from the Florists.

Democracy sucks sometimes and takes rights away from individuals and the great majority of stupid Left Wing Moon Bats that dominate Washington State politics is a great example of how abusive the majority can be sometimes.

Then work to have the law repealed...I'm sure you will get a majority behind you, right?

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, Barronelle Stutzman is a dying breed, she has every right to stand up to the Socialist Government! The gay couple didn`t even report her to the Law? The Law stuck there nose in her business!!! She has "Natural Rights" as an individual American, that GOD gave every American! Political scientists and philosophers often refer to "life, liberty, and property" as "Natural Rights" which are derived from "the natural law." Thomas Jefferson substituted "pursuit of happiness" in place of "property" in the Unalienable Rights, United States Declaration of Independence! You Go Girl, we Americans need more people like you!!!

"GTP"

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Im not sure im into businesses serving people they dont want to .....by force of the government.

If theyre known bigots and enough people decide not to shop there as a result, theyll fail.

That all said, shes a despicable bigot. **** her

I agree completely. I think that discriminating against homosexuals should not only be legal, but protected!

The only catch is that they should have to post big signs by the entrance and include a clearly visible "non fine print" disclaimer in all their advertisements that they refuse to serve homosexuals.

But what if all business in their area did that? What if there was no business in their area who would do business with them?

Where would gay people shop? How would they get food to live? How would they have a place to live?

I guess their only option is to move to a place that doesn't discriminate against them. Why should a person have to leave their home, family, friends and job just so that someone will sell goods and services to them?

That's the problem with such an attitude. You're allowing business to force someone to starve to death or not have clothes or a roof over their heads.

And what about our constitution? It clearly says everyone is equal under the law. Do you now just want to trash the constitution to be able to starve people to death?

Then they would have to go into business themselves.

Christians aren't going to cater to sacrilegious ceremonies, and the homo lobby can't force them to. It isn't going to happen. They don't have a "constitutional right" to cake baked by Christians.

A court house wedding is by definition not religiously sacred.

Marriage is a sacrament, regardless of who or where it's performed.

And you can't force people to participate in disgusting acts of ritual sacrilege.

Really? Are all divorced people going to Hell? Should a woman whose husband beats her and the children stay with him, out of faith?

 

[koshergrl]

She's not a dying breed, we're going to see this more and more.

Christians aren't going to participate in sacrilege. It's where they draw the line. They won't do it. And the government will have to kill them before they do.

Which is fine by idiots like ravtard and seawytch..this is what they've been waiting for.

 

[bodecea]

Wow.....talk about revisionist history.

Fact is not revisionist, shorbus.

Racism is predicated upon the notion that man is a product of his inclusion in a group. It is collectivist by nature. That one does not guide one's own life and views, but instead is driven by the actions of ancestors who shared a common skin color/

Racism is and always will be a leftist ideology. Big lie will not alter reality.

Amazing how you continue with that revisionist history.

 

[Flash]

Show us the part of her religion where she gets to lie about following the business laws she signed up for.

I have never in my life "signed up for a law", have you?

Laws are imposed on citizens usually under the threat of severe consequences.

It was wrong for a law to protect a despicable minority at the expense of a Constitutionally guaranteed right to be passed in the first place.

I support good laws and I oppose bad laws. Every citizen should.

Too bad this lady got fucked by those shitass Liberals that dominate Washington State politics. They are some of the most confused and ignorant voters in the country. I lived in that state for seven years. The people on the east side were decent conservative Americans. The morons that lived on the west side were mostly Looney Tune Moon Bats when it came to politics.

They got it wrong by passing a law that did away with the Florist right of religion but at least the idiots are consistent. Last November the idiots passed a law that required that every citizen of the state must get permission for the government before being allowed the right to keep and and bear arms. Even though the US Constitution and the Washington State Constitution guarantees it.

This just shows you that when Liberals get in control of government the people have no rights unless they are a special interest groups the Liberals like.

 

[Ravi]

She's not a dying breed, we're going to see this more and more.

Christians aren't going to participate in sacrilege. It's where they draw the line. They won't do it. And the government will have to kill them before they do.

Which is fine by idiots like ravtard and seawytch..this is what they've been waiting for.

Enjoy hell! That's where liars and haters like you end up. You and Jeri will have lots of fun.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

She's not a dying breed, we're going to see this more and more.

Christians aren't going to participate in sacrilege. It's where they draw the line.

Christians already are participating, or are they not really Christians if they do?

 

[bodecea]

Nope. Unlike you, I don't succumb to stereotypes.

I guess you are that stupid. The subject was specifically Southern Democrats who opposed the civil rights movement.

And you, retard, somehow heard "everyone from the South".

Isn't that what Boo said? Or do you not know a blanket statement when you see one?

I said, "the Democrats of the 50s and 60s who opposed the civil rights movement were right wingers", and Boo completed the statement with, "and from the South." So the totality of the statement became, "The Democrats of the 50s and 60s who opposed the civil rights movement were right wingers and from the South."

Exactly, it doesn't mean everyone in the south was a conservative or a racist either. But Southern Republicans, by percentage, were even more against the Civil Rights Act than the Southern Democrats were.

That's a very misleading stat since southern blacks were Democrats

Not back then....

 

[bodecea]

[

She can do pretty much whatever she likes in church, but businesses are required to follow Man's laws, not God's.

But you left out the part about the Bill of Rights protecting the right of the people to have freedom of religion and that right is not restricted to within the walls of a church.

You Libtard are always confused about things like this, aren't you?

Show us the part of her religion where she gets to lie about following the business laws she signed up for.

She followed all the laws. This was a long time customer of nine years. Certainly if she refused to sell them flowers it would have been an issue before now.

The judge disagreed.

 

[Nosmo King]

She's not a dying breed, we're going to see this more and more.

Christians aren't going to participate in sacrilege. It's where they draw the line. They won't do it. And the government will have to kill them before they do.

Which is fine by idiots like ravtard and seawytch..this is what they've been waiting for.

Making a floral arraignment is not sacrilege, it's her business.

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, the Socialist just make Laws, until someone takes them to court, and they stand corrected!!!

"GTP"

 

[bodecea]

Im not sure im into businesses serving people they dont want to .....by force of the government.

If theyre known bigots and enough people decide not to shop there as a result, theyll fail.

That all said, shes a despicable bigot. **** her

I agree completely. I think that discriminating against homosexuals should not only be legal, but protected!

The only catch is that they should have to post big signs by the entrance and include a clearly visible "non fine print" disclaimer in all their advertisements that they refuse to serve homosexuals.

But what if all business in their area did that? What if there was no business in their area who would do business with them?

Where would gay people shop? How would they get food to live? How would they have a place to live?

I guess their only option is to move to a place that doesn't discriminate against them. Why should a person have to leave their home, family, friends and job just so that someone will sell goods and services to them?

That's the problem with such an attitude. You're allowing business to force someone to starve to death or not have clothes or a roof over their heads.

And what about our constitution? It clearly says everyone is equal under the law. Do you now just want to trash the constitution to be able to starve people to death?

Then they would have to go into business themselves.

Christians aren't going to cater to sacrilegious ceremonies, and the homo lobby can't force them to. It isn't going to happen. They don't have a "constitutional right" to cake baked by Christians.

Do tell us of this Christian revolt? We are all very interested?

Was that in anyway related to "American Spring"? I understand that was going to be a huge success.

 

[bodecea]

Im not sure im into businesses serving people they dont want to .....by force of the government.

If theyre known bigots and enough people decide not to shop there as a result, theyll fail.

That all said, shes a despicable bigot. **** her

I agree completely. I think that discriminating against homosexuals should not only be legal, but protected!

The only catch is that they should have to post big signs by the entrance and include a clearly visible "non fine print" disclaimer in all their advertisements that they refuse to serve homosexuals.

But what if all business in their area did that? What if there was no business in their area who would do business with them?

Where would gay people shop? How would they get food to live? How would they have a place to live?

I guess their only option is to move to a place that doesn't discriminate against them. Why should a person have to leave their home, family, friends and job just so that someone will sell goods and services to them?

That's the problem with such an attitude. You're allowing business to force someone to starve to death or not have clothes or a roof over their heads.

And what about our constitution? It clearly says everyone is equal under the law. Do you now just want to trash the constitution to be able to starve people to death?

Then they would have to go into business themselves.

Christians aren't going to cater to sacrilegious ceremonies, and the homo lobby can't force them to. It isn't going to happen. They don't have a "constitutional right" to cake baked by Christians.

A court house wedding is by definition not religiously sacred.

Marriage is a sacrament, regardless of who or where it's performed.

And you can't force people to participate in disgusting acts of ritual sacrilege.

Pray tell...how is selling flowers "participating"?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Amazing how you continue with that revisionist history.

You mean that I fail to recite the revisionism of your party, assclown?

 

[bodecea]

Yo, Barronelle Stutzman is a dying breed, she has every right to stand up to the Socialist Government! The gay couple didn`t even report her to the Law? The Law stuck there nose in her business!!! She has "Natural Rights" as an individual American, that GOD gave every American! Political scientists and philosophers often refer to "life, liberty, and property" as "Natural Rights" which are derived from "the natural law." Thomas Jefferson substituted "pursuit of happiness" in place of "property" in the Unalienable Rights, United States Declaration of Independence! You Go Girl, we Americans need more people like you!!!

"GTP"

View attachment 37156

Oh good...another religion trumps the Constitution loony.