As a critical thinker, I can't help but notice how short and uninformative that article is. That is some of the worst journalism I have ever seen. That's what you get when you read blogs.
As a critical thinker you lack the ability to think.
1) The article makes no mention of how the new policy compares to the old policy. It is an apples and oranges comparison. Her new policy has much more coverage.
With a premium increase of of almost $6000 a year I would expect the ******* hospital to show up at her front door. Unless you want to point out which plan on the new exchanges provides that kind of benefit increase over pre-Obamacare insurance, I suggest you drop the apples to oranges bullshit.
Yes, it is absolutely wrong the woman is not being allowed to keep an insurance policy the government has decided is substandard for her needs. The government should not be deciding what is best for me.
Yet you just argued in favor of it because the ******* plan is better, what a ******* dipshit.
2) She is not being forced to buy the $591 policy. It is what her old insurance company is offering as a replacement. She is free to buy another policy from another company on the exchange.
What is the least expensive policy in Florida for someone her age?
You don't know? Then how the **** do you know the one she is talking about isn't the least expensive? Is that another example of your non-critical thinking?
3) The article makes no mention if the woman qualifies for a federal subsidy which will pay for most, if not all, of her new policy. The video DOES say she is eligible for subsidies. So she may end up actually paying LESS for her insurance. And she will have a better policy than her old one.
That makes me feel so much better that you will be paying $500+ every month for her insurance, does that make you feel good?
4) The article says, "at least 300,000 people are losing coverage". I can guarantee you this is a lie of omission and thus blows the integrity of the report right out of the water. This woman is an example. She lost her OLD coverage, but now has NEW coverage being offered to her. This is the case with most, if not all, of those 300,000 the hack writer says are losing their coverage.
Whioch is why you have solid numbers to prove it wrong.
Except, for some dipshit reason, you actually don't.
The people who are receiving cancellation notices are people who have policies that are not comprehensive enough under the ACA regulations.
But they are not actually losing their insurance policy because they get to not keep them.
Just as I did not believe the Democratic claim there were "46 million uninsured Americans", I do not believe the Republican claim flying about that "16 million Americans" are losing their health insurance.
If I recall, you were among the people able to provide ******* numbers for that one, yet you still don't have any for arguing against this one. Is the dipshit reason you can't argue with these numbers is that they are right?
Or is the real dipshit reason that you are a dipshit?
Yes, Obama's claim you could keep your insurance was a massive lie. Absolutely. But the Right is not being entirely truthful, either.
You cannot document one thing that I am saying about the number of people losing their insurance being wrong, even when I provide specific links that show where the numbers are coming from. That is not critical thinking, despite your dipshit belief that you are a critical thinker. Critical thinking is making a decision based on the examination of the evidence, not staking out a position that the other side is lying and refusing to accept the facts.