Flagging trump in the Epstein files

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

MY question to Grok: Did Pam Bondi ever say she had seen the Epstein list or had the Epstein list, or did she only say she had the file on her desk?


Response from Grok: Attorney General Pam Bondi stated in a February 2025 Fox News interview that the Jeffrey Epstein “client list” was “sitting on my desk right now” for review, implying she had a specific document listing Epstein’s clients. She told host John Roberts, “It’s sitting on my desk right now to review. That’s been a directive by President Trump. I’m reviewing that,” in response to a question about whether the Department of Justice would release such a list. She also mentioned reviewing JFK and MLK files alongside the Epstein files, suggesting she was referring to a broader set of documents but specifically highlighted the “client list” when asked.


However, in July 2025, the Justice Department released a memo concluding that no such “client list” existed, contradicting Bondi’s earlier statement. During a cabinet meeting on July 8, 2025, Bondi clarified that her February comment referred to the entire Epstein case file, not a specific client list, saying, “I did an interview on Fox, and it’s been getting a lot of attention because I said I was asked a question about the client list, and my response was, it’s sitting on my desk to be reviewed – meaning the file along with the JFK, MLK files as well.” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Justice Department spokesperson Chad Gilmartin also defended Bondi, asserting she meant the overall Epstein case files, not a distinct client list.




Bondi never explicitly said she had seen the client list, only that it was on her desk for review in February. Her later clarification and the DOJ’s findings suggest she may have misspoken or been mistaken about the existence of a specific list. The evidence indicates she claimed to have the “client list” on her desk but did not confirm reviewing its contents before the DOJ’s July memo clarified no such list existed.


PS. I hope this helps put this matter to bed.

She said she had it on her desk.

That means it exists. Or she was lying,

 

[sartre play]

What a mess,
Reality tells us that the Rich & powerful will NEVER allow there names outed.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

She said she had it on her desk.

That means it exists. Or she was lying,

For your homework, class, please reread Paradoxicals posts on the matter.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

For your homework, class, please reread Paradoxicals posts on the matter.

Paradoxical is trying to confuse us.

She said the book exists.

Release it.

 

[dblack]

For your homework, class, please reread Paradoxicals posts on the matter.

Class?

Don't skip your meds!

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Paradoxical is trying to confuse us.

She said the book exists.

Release it.

Response from Grok:




Bondi never explicitly said she had seen the client list, only that it was on her desk for review in February. Her later clarification and the DOJ’s findings suggest she may have misspoken or been mistaken about the existence of a specific list. The evidence indicates she claimed to have the “client list” on her desk but did not confirm reviewing its contents before the DOJ’s July memo clarified no such list existed.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Class?

Don't skip your meds!

Yep. I am the teacher and you guys are the students. That some of you are still in your thirties and living at home in the garage or basement doesn't matter

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yep. I am the teacher and you guys are the students. That some of you are still in your thirties and living at home in the garage or basement doesn't matter

You are only a goof ball tolerated by your betters.

Always.

 

[dblack]

Yep. I am the teacher and you guys are the students. That some of you are still in your thirties and living at home in the garage or basement doesn't matter

You rawk!

 

[The Irish Ram]

Trump is obviously guilty of something

^
Too funny. You sound like those pathetic women on the View...

 

[Paradoxical#1]

You are only a goof ball tolerated by your betters.

Always.

goof ball? Why? Because I post what Grok said about your wild claims? My betters? There are none/

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

goof ball? Why? Because I post what Grok said about your wild claims? My betters? There are none/

Yes, your better in every way. We are not MAGA. Grok has it wrong as you because you go by faith not facts.

 

[ding]

My betters? There are none/

Textbook dunning effect.

 

[ding]

Yep. I am the teacher and you guys are the students. That some of you are still in your thirties and living at home in the garage or basement doesn't matter

What’s your level of education again?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

That passage—“Yep. I am the teacher and you guys are the students…”—reflects a conversational, informal tone with simple sentence structure and everyday vocabulary. Based on readability metrics like Flesch-Kincaid or Gunning Fog Index, this type of writing typically falls around a Grade 5 to Grade 7 level.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Yes, your better in every way. We are not MAGA. Grok has it wrong as you because you go by faith not facts.

Prove your claims

 

[Paradoxical#1]

What’s your level of education again?

What? Stupid idiotic post.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Prove your claims

You prove yours. You have made them.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

What? Stupid idiotic post.

About grade 7 if we are being nice.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

You prove yours. You have made them.

I quoted facts from Grok