Flagging trump in the Epstein files

He has the answer from five threads but he keeps on like a stubborn mule.

The question to Bondi was about a list. Her incomplete answer referred to the "File" on her desk for review. Not a specific list. Shut that horse off.
The left and the politicians are using this as their fodder. It reminds me of Christians saying "Jesus helps me" and when you ask for proof, they become silent. One guy here insisted that he did, and I asked him to send me a photo of Jesus standing next to him. I'm still waiting.

So, the "list" is like Jesus/God. They can use that like Christians use Jesus and assume it exists without ever having to produce the list, a picture of it, emails, a PDF. Schumer used that Christian line last week where he said, "All this stuff Trump is doing is because he's afraid of the Epstein file." In that manner he told the believers (like Christians) what to say like Johnny slow horses and others do.

It is "The lists exists because Pam said so and Trump is in that list and unless you produce the list what we say is true." It is like telling us to prove God does not exist. Christians and leftists use identical tactics.
 
While clicking through posts.. saw this interesting photo on Talking points memo,
of the president & wife with Epstein & HER...
Yep. Trump and Melania met Epstein, and therefore that proves he's on the list. It's like saying the Grand Canyon has such a deep cavern and evidence that water went through it proves the great flood and Noah's Ark is true.
 
Blondie was specifically asked about releasing a client list

If she hadn’t looked at the file, she should have said so
Instead, she was asked about a client list and said it was on her desk
She made it vanish because of who was on it, of course.
 
So Mods merged my thread on ths into another one and then closed that.

That's why I'm bringing this back up with a new OP.

Apparently the review process was long, involved, and chaotic, Actually keep hundreds of agents locked down in the building for days on end and with fluctuating parameters. There is an actual spreadsheet of instances trump was named in the files, and video instruction on what to put in it. And if they need a spreadsheet, I can only assume there were many, because you don't put 5 or 10 things in a spreadsheet.

At first, the analysts were told to mark nothing. This was roundly rejected by the analysts, who were then told to not think about it as releasing the information - including victims names - to the public, but to think about it as releasing it to the Attorney General. It was assumed that Bondi and Patel wanted all the information, including the victim’s names and information. Analysts were told that what would be released would be solely up to Pam Bondi. Many feared that the victim’s information would be released or used for nefarious purposes. Eventually, lawyers from the Department of Justice were assigned to the project to oversee what was being flagged for redaction.

That changed pretty quickly and the analysts were next told to mark the victim’s names for redaction. Then soon after that, they were told to mark all other Personal Identifiable Information (PII) such as social security numbers and addresses. Then they were told to mark all descriptions of illicit acts for redaction. Then finally, they were instructed to keep a spreadsheet of instances when Trump was mentioned. After the spreadsheets of mentions of Trump were handed in, they were stitched together in one master list. I was not able to learn how many mentions of Donald Trump were on that master list.




So, from the first incident in 2005, it's Trump's fault. Got it.
 
Yep. Trump and Melania met Epstein, and therefore that proves he's on the list. It's like saying the Grand Canyon has such a deep cavern and evidence that water went through it proves the great flood and Noah's Ark is true.

Release the list, and if you are right, it will release Trump.

He is stuck irrevocably until he releases the list, and that hurts GOP election chances.
 
The left and the politicians are using this as their fodder. It reminds me of Christians saying "Jesus helps me" and when you ask for proof, they become silent. One guy here insisted that he did, and I asked him to send me a photo of Jesus standing next to him. I'm still waiting.

So, the "list" is like Jesus/God. They can use that like Christians use Jesus and assume it exists without ever having to produce the list, a picture of it, emails, a PDF. Schumer used that Christian line last week where he said, "All this stuff Trump is doing is because he's afraid of the Epstein file." In that manner he told the believers (like Christians) what to say like Johnny slow horses and others do.

It is "The lists exists because Pam said so and Trump is in that list and unless you produce the list what we say is true." It is like telling us to prove God does not exist. Christians and leftists use identical tactics.
You mean like tRump when he ran on releasing this list?
 
Yep. Trump and Melania met Epstein, and therefore that proves he's on the list. It's like saying the Grand Canyon has such a deep cavern and evidence that water went through it proves the great flood and Noah's Ark is true.
tRump met Melania through Epstein. When she was like 25 years old.
 
Then what was it doing on blondie's desk?
She misspoke. The FILE was on here desk. Do you really think she had the time and the only thing she had on her plate was to go through tens of thousands of documents to appease the Democrats about some file which THEY said existed before and yet NEVER produced it.
 
Release the list, and if you are right, it will release Trump.

He is stuck irrevocably until he releases the list, and that hurts GOP election chances.
If there was a list when Garland was there, where is it now. It's gone, meaning he or the FBI removed it. Garland had the file and if it contained Trumps name why did he bury it?
 
15th post
She misspoke. The FILE was on here desk. Do you really think she had the time and the only thing she had on her plate was to go through tens of thousands of documents to appease the Democrats about some file which THEY said existed before and yet NEVER produced it.
It's always. "they misspoke" or "just kidding" or some shit with you guys.

Nobody's buying that line of bull anymore.
 
He can't know that Garland would have destroyed the damming list to Democrats.
Again, if it wasn't there then why did they need dozens of agents and a spreadsheet to track tRump's appearances?

Come on kid, the cognitive dissonance is getting deafening in here.
 
And________________________?
1on8bs.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom