Flagging trump in the Epstein files

You had your chance to release it dummy... but Biden knew who was on it.... and it wasn't Trump...
View attachment 1147548
Sick people on the left... no God and no love....
We didn't make the promise....Trump did.

Trump lied to you.....remember, simp? Do you recall when I rubbed egg all over your face a little while ago?
 
I understand your frustration....a MAGA simp like you just doesn't have the intellectual guns to hang with me. TSK, TSK.

Or are you finally getting upset that Trump lied to you?? That would be some great self-improvement on your part, simp!!

Way to go....get some dignity and self-respect!! Stop letting Trump turn you into a whimpering, cowering dog!!
 
Trump lied to you, simp. --

2019 --

In August 2019, after Epstein's death, Trump retweeted a post that alleged Bill Clinton was connected to Epstein's death.

When asked about his retweet in an interview, Trump said "what we're saying is we want an investigation. I want a full investigation, and that's what I absolutely am demanding. That's what our attorney general -- our great attorney general -- is doing." The attorney general at the time was Bill Barr.



2024 --

In June 2024, Trump was asked if he would release various files -- including the John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. assassination files and the Epstein files -- during an interview with Fox News.

"Would you declassify the Epstein files?" Fox News' Rachel Campos-Duffy asked. Trump responded, "Yeah, yeah, I would."
He evolved.

Just like Barry Hussein and Hitlery on gay marriage, Simp. :auiqs.jpg:
 
1754883923904.webp
 
Your party traffics in prostitution drugs and allows criminals to reoffend.... you are in favor of children changing their sex... you lie to them and tell them if the change their mind they can change back... you burn our flag and wave the flags of our enemy... you suck and I hope you all lose your minds when we crush you in the midterms...
Matt Gaetz is not a Dem
 
LOTS of Hate, Some times short of Any facts that do not support that Hate. Sad stuff.
 
So Mods merged my thread on ths into another one and then closed that.

That's why I'm bringing this back up with a new OP.

Apparently the review process was long, involved, and chaotic, Actually keep hundreds of agents locked down in the building for days on end and with fluctuating parameters. There is an actual spreadsheet of instances trump was named in the files, and video instruction on what to put in it. And if they need a spreadsheet, I can only assume there were many, because you don't put 5 or 10 things in a spreadsheet.

At first, the analysts were told to mark nothing. This was roundly rejected by the analysts, who were then told to not think about it as releasing the information - including victims names - to the public, but to think about it as releasing it to the Attorney General. It was assumed that Bondi and Patel wanted all the information, including the victim’s names and information. Analysts were told that what would be released would be solely up to Pam Bondi. Many feared that the victim’s information would be released or used for nefarious purposes. Eventually, lawyers from the Department of Justice were assigned to the project to oversee what was being flagged for redaction.

That changed pretty quickly and the analysts were next told to mark the victim’s names for redaction. Then soon after that, they were told to mark all other Personal Identifiable Information (PII) such as social security numbers and addresses. Then they were told to mark all descriptions of illicit acts for redaction. Then finally, they were instructed to keep a spreadsheet of instances when Trump was mentioned. After the spreadsheets of mentions of Trump were handed in, they were stitched together in one master list. I was not able to learn how many mentions of Donald Trump were on that master list.




Orange bag O' shit. :rolleyes:
 
Barr is back to being a fascist. Shucks, he was a libtard hero just a few weeks ago.
 
15th post
You mean implicated and no he didn't.

What he said was that he didn't see it and it was left unclear what he saw at all.
He did so... just because you don't see it on fake news that's your problem
 
Why don't you stop posting empty assertions and simply quote him.

Quote him saying "absolutely not implicated". Double dare you bullshit peddler.
So now you admit he said it?... shutup dummy...
 
Why don't you stop posting empty assertions and simply quote him.

Quote him saying "absolutely not implicated". Double dare you bullshit peddler.
Trump is not guilty of anything involving Epstein... Barr said so and so has many others... you just hate seeing your last hope fade away... Trump is a good man unlike Biden Obama Clinton and all the other dems in your party male and female....
 
Back
Top Bottom