Finally, The Admission!

There is no such thing as 'hate speech.'

That is a term of art designed by the Left, those who cannot win a debate of ideas, to shut the other side up.

Or.....find the term in the law of the land, the Constitution, you Fascist.
If you're looking for hate speech AND fascists you need look no further than your liberal-hating friends at Stormfront:

The truth is "hate" to those who hate the truth!
We are a community of racial realists and idealists. Black, Hispanic, Asian and Jewish Nationalists openly support their racial interests, with American taxpayers even required to support the Jewish ethnostate of Israel. We are White Nationalists who support true diversity and a homeland for all peoples, including ours. We are the voice of the new, embattled White minority!​


"...your liberal-hating friends at Stormfront:"


Your lack of education is showing again.....see the disadvantage you're under never having read a book?

Nazis and Liberals share beliefs.


Example.....
Workers Welfare Programs:

In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.

LIES YOUR TEACHER TAUGHT YOU: Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies





All six of the Shameful Six are basically the same.

Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



Politically, 'my friends' would be the Founders, classical liberals, and other conservatives.



Don't make that mistake again, or it is back to summer school.
 
In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.

Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.


1. "Why America needs a hate speech law

2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]



3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s
assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]

4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]


5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/





We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.

The handwriting is on the wall.


so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok

YES. We have the Natural Right of Free Speech ESPECIALLY FOR THE SPEECH WE DON'T LIKE OR DISAGREE. Anything could potentially be defined as Hate Speech. Why do you hate Rights, Freedom and Liberty so much?



Can you imagine the government schooling that produces Fascists like that....?????
His sort favors socialism....which is theft, and silencing any speech they don't approve of.....
 
In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.

Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.


1. "Why America needs a hate speech law

2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]



3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s
assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]

4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]


5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/





We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.

The handwriting is on the wall.


so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok

No such thing.
We only have safe space punks who cant stand to be contradicted.



That's because, in the marketplace of ideas, we on the Right eat their lunch......
 
In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.

Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.


1. "Why America needs a hate speech law

2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]



3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s
assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]

4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]


5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/





We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.

The handwriting is on the wall.


so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
 
Can you imagine the government schooling that produces Fascists like that....?????
His sort favors socialism....which is theft, and silencing any speech they don't approve of.....
All Totalitarian governments must outlaw the freedoms we have in the Bill of Rights. Whether it be Fascism, Communism, Socialism, Progressivism, or some mixture of the bunch.

That's why the Founders put them there....
 
Who controls government school?????
We do. As in Americans. In my neck of the woods, voters in our county elect a school board and they control our schools. if school boards are run by Progressives....Liberals....Democrats someone is voting them in. Or are conservative too stupid and uninformed about the candidates and elections, or do they just not care about education?



Let's review.


OK, OK....let's go back to basics:

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.




" Franklin Roosevelt had pictured a place where citizens were joined in a collective enterprise ... Reagan pictured a more individualistic America where everyone would flourish once freed from the shackles of the state, and so the watchwords became self-reliance and small government."
The Liberal Crackup


Get it now????



The question was, who controls government schools.

You failed the test.

The answer is, it is Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats, who advance Marxist, and neo-Marxist and Social Justice rather than education.



This must be why you do so poorly:

"So…you’re a government school grad?

“Yes I am (and my wife and kids are too) and I'm not ashamed of it. “

Easy To Convince The Uneducated
Epic Fail! Was that really the closest snippet you could find to the question of "who controls government schools"? Sorry but I vote in my local school board elections not Reagan or FDR.

BTW, you haven't demonstrated that public schools are worse than the alternatives, at least in the US.
 
Nazis and Liberals share beliefs.
While this has some truth in it, it is also accurate to say Nazis and Conservatives share beliefs too. You can tell a lot about someone by the company they keep. I defy you find any Nazi with good things to say about communists or any US neo-Nazi that has good things to say about the Dems. I believe it was the #1 guy in the GOP who said there were 'good people' who marched with Nazis.
 
Who controls government school?

We do. As in Americans. In my neck of the woods, voters in our county elect a school board and they control our schools. if school boards are run by Progressives....Liberals....Democrats someone is voting them in. Or are conservative too stupid and uninformed about the candidates and elections, or do they just not care about education?

People that lean more conservative or Republican are typically NOT ACTIVSISTS and don't have the time to pressure and protest school boards. They have Jobs, Families and Lives.

We have thus allowed the Teacher's Unions (DEMOCRATS) to take over school districts and implement their brand of Far Left, woke, PC, SJW INDOCTRINATION. This has been going on for DECADES. Now have generations of people that hate traditional American values that made this country great.
 
In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.

Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.


1. "Why America needs a hate speech law

2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]



3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s
assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]

4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]


5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/





We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.

The handwriting is on the wall.


so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?
 
In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.

Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.


1. "Why America needs a hate speech law

2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]



3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s
assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]

4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]


5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/





We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.

The handwriting is on the wall.


so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?

YES!!! I support the free speech for all terrorist groups including ISIS, AL Queda, ANTIFA and BLM. It allows us to see exactly what they are.
 
Last edited:
Who controls government school?

We do. As in Americans. In my neck of the woods, voters in our county elect a school board and they control our schools. if school boards are run by Progressives....Liberals....Democrats someone is voting them in. Or are conservative too stupid and uninformed about the candidates and elections, or do they just not care about education?

People that lean more conservative or Republican are typically NOT ACTIVSISTS and don't have the time to pressure and protest school boards. They have Jobs, Families and Lives.

We have thus allowed the Teacher's Unions (DEMOCRATS) to take over school districts and implement their brand of Far Left, woke, PC, SJW INDOCTRINATION. This has been going on for DECADES. Now have generations of people that hate traditional American values that made this country great.
What BS. People in Red states vote. Are they too stupid to vote for a school board that reflects their values? I doubt it. You can scapegoat Teacher's Unions but any fault lies with the voters.

I'd say that people that lean more conservative or Republican don't want to pay for decent schools, either from ideology, selfishness, or because their kids are home schooled or in private schools.
 
so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?

YES!!! I support the free speech for all terrorist groups including ISIS, AL Queda, ANTIFA and BLM. It allows us to see exactly what the are.
And recruit those that don't see? Isn't the world a dangerous enough place?
 
"Student Thinks There’s Too Much Free Speech on Campus After Encountering Pro-Life Group
The College Fix reports:

Student files complaint against pro-life group, saying there’s too much free speech

While walking on the Florida State University campus earlier this year, a student noticed a pro-life group holding signs “advocating for anti-abortion propaganda.”

According to the student, the protesters “were stopping innocent students simply trying to walk to their classes by harassing them and forcing their own beliefs onto these students.”

“Campus is supposed to be a safe environment and I was extremely uncomfortable and disappointed in FSU today,” the student said. “Nothing was being done to protect students from this harassment.”

“I understand that freedom of speech is a crucial part of today’s world, however, it should not be to this extent while on a school campus,” the student wrote in a March complaint to the FSU campus behavior reporting system.

In the complaint, the student recommended “Some sort of action to prevent [groups] from being able to harass others while walking to class,” saying “this is not the first time that I have felt uncomfortable while on campus.”

This complaint is one of the 31 filed with FSU during the 2018-19 school year that have been obtained by The College Fix through a public records act request. The names of the individuals involved were redacted by the university to protect their identities."
Student Thinks There's Too Much Free Speech on Campus After Encountering Pro-Life Group



What happened to the idealism, the love of America and liberty?????


Government schooling happened.
freedom of speech is freedom of speech, period. if someone is harassing you, get the campus cops to help out and stop it, but stop trying to stop free speech overall cause you don't like what you hear.
 
In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.

Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.


1. "Why America needs a hate speech law

2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]



3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s
assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]

4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]


5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/





We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.

The handwriting is on the wall.


so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?
/——-/ By censoring ISIS hate speech the public will never know the extent of their evil. If we limit speech to the topics of rainbows and puppy dogs, ISIS is free to advance their hatred. Is that your goal?
 
In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.

Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.


1. "Why America needs a hate speech law

2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]



3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s
assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]

4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]


5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/





We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.

The handwriting is on the wall.


so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?
/——-/ By censoring ISIS hate speech the public will never know the extent of their evil. If we limit speech to the topics of rainbows and puppy dogs,
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?

YES!!! I support the free speech for all terrorist groups including ISIS, AL Queda, ANTIFA and BLM. It allows us to see exactly what the are.
And recruit those that don't see? Isn't the world a dangerous enough place?
/——/ How does restricting speech in the USA stop ISIS from spreading their hatred in the Middle East? Makes no sense.
 
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?

YES!!! I support the free speech for all terrorist groups including ISIS, AL Queda, ANTIFA and BLM. It allows us to see exactly what the are.
And recruit those that don't see? Isn't the world a dangerous enough place?
and it likely always will be. i never found screaming SHUT UP to be a good way to protect yourself from the dangers. at least if people can say what's on their mind you know how they feel. otherwise you're simply imposing how you THINK they feel onto them.

where do you draw the line at controlling what people say and think?
 
Nazis and Liberals share beliefs.
While this has some truth in it, it is also accurate to say Nazis and Conservatives share beliefs too. You can tell a lot about someone by the company they keep. I defy you find any Nazi with good things to say about communists or any US neo-Nazi that has good things to say about the Dems. I believe it was the #1 guy in the GOP who said there were 'good people' who marched with Nazis.


See.....this is your disadvantage, never having read a book.


"I defy you find any Nazi with good things to say about communists..."

Watch this, dunce:


A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925

"Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

"Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.




Next time.....take your shoe off before you put your foot in your mouth.
 
In this precinct some of us have regularly posted that Democrats/Progressives are, in fact, Fascists.

Now...right in the Liberal house organ, the Washington Post, the open admission of a desire to end the first amendment, to do away with free speech.


1. "Why America needs a hate speech law

2. Richard Stengel, a former editor of Time, is the author of “Information Wars” and was the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs from 2013 to 2016. [Whose administration was this???]



3. ...I loved Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s
assertion that the Constitution and the First Amendment are not just about protecting “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
[Before he got in touch with his inner Nazi.]

4. But as a government official traveling around the world championing the virtues of free speech, I came to see how our First Amendment standard is an outlier. Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?
[He takes his cues on freedom from 'Arab diplomats'?????]


5. ... the First Amendment protects the “thought that we hate,” but it should not protect hateful speech that can cause violence by one group against another. In an age when everyone has a megaphone, that seems like a design flaw.
[This imbecile....er, Democrat should read
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/





We have warned America for some time....if the Democrats ever gain total control of the Supreme Court, they will end free speech.
Justice Kagan has a history of opposing free speech.

The handwriting is on the wall.


so just to be clear... you stand in support of hate speech

Ok
/———/ I support all speech even the kind I find offensive.
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?



The term 'hate speech' is made up....a 'term of art,' ....to allow you Fascists to silence any opposition.


The government is not allowed to silence any speech...as per the first amendment.....outside of that described in Brandenburg.
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia




Must I be responsible for your entire education?????
 
Wow, someone even more liberal than me. I don't think ISIS should be allowed to post their hate on the web but I'm sure they are thankful for your support.


Truly a juvenile attempt to be clever.
So PoliticalChic, using small words, is ISIS an example of the 'hate speech' you claim doesn't exist?

Cellblock2429, do you support the free speech right of ISIS?

YES!!! I support the free speech for all terrorist groups including ISIS, AL Queda, ANTIFA and BLM. It allows us to see exactly what the are.
And recruit those that don't see? Isn't the world a dangerous enough place?
and it likely always will be. i never found screaming SHUT UP to be a good way to protect yourself from the dangers. at least if people can say what's on their mind you know how they feel. otherwise you're simply imposing how you THINK they feel onto them.

where do you draw the line at controlling what people say and think?




I believe the Left is pumped up at having banned one particular word, and claim it their success in 'helping' black Americans.

Now they's like to add the tactic to the entire dictionary.
 

Forum List

Back
Top