Democrats....Listen To Maher, He's Trying To Help

The difference you perceive between the two parties is only rhetorical (political stagecraft) . The combined actions / inaction of both parties throughout the iterations of power transitions have resulted in the destruction of America. This is something that anyone can verify with their their own eyes!

Two parties pretend to be different, but curiously the outcome for America is the same - destruction!
"....only rhetorical (political stagecraft)..."


I see....you aren't really stupid.......you're just a run-of-the mill liar.


None of these are simply meaningless terms....they are all impositions on a free country.


Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system



Clearly there is no similar list of Fascist agendas by the other party, only the Democrats.
 
"....only rhetorical (political stagecraft)..."


I see....you aren't really stupid.......you're just a run-of-the mill liar.


None of these are simply meaningless terms....they are all impositions on a free country.


Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system



Clearly there is no similar list of Fascist agendas by the other party, only the Democrats.

The "race and gender preferences" since the Romans, have been white and male. And that is totally contradictory of a republic, where the law is supposed to instead favor Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion.

There is still way too much "punishment for criminals".
Legally you can only defend the inherent rights of individuals, so then laws like over drugs, sex, alcohol, etc. are inherently illegal in a republic. When you dictate without being necessary to defend others, that is not legal in a republic.

Borders are supposed to be "open".
This country was built on open borders and since we are almost all the descendants of illegal Euro immigrants, it is illegal to now try to close the borders, and even worse that those we deport are almost all descendants of natives who have a legal right to be here.

However I agree that Transgender had a decade of illegal hormones that should make it illegal for them to compete in women's sports.

The word "antisemitism" is all wrong. First of all, you have to capitalize it. Second is that the word Semitic comes from Shem, the fabled son of Noah who was to have fathered all Arabs, and it means "of Arab origins" not Jewish. Since the Hebrew were Arab, it can at most include Jews, but not be exclusive to them.

Wealth tax is the only fair way to do it.
It not only reflects the ability to pay, but those who gained the most from the government spending in the first place.

All societies do and should have a "cancel culture" over things unacceptable, like racism, abusing children, religious discrimination, etc. It is the wealthy elite who try to promote racist/fascism to excuse their obvious unfair bias.

The hallmark of civilization is state welfare.
Mohammed was one of the first to ask for donations for use to support widows and orphans.
But it should not be a function of just religion, since then other religions do not pay their fair share. So obviously welfare should be done by the state instead.

It is government who should be providing free health care, because all privatized insurance companies do is double the price by adding on layers of profits.

Sanctuary cites are inherent to law since the feds are only supposed to have jurisdiction over the borders that can't be locally controlled.
If a state or city wants more immigrants, the feds should have nothing to say about it.
All of the US is actually taken from others, and the treaties when we took it said we can't block things like immigration. ICE is totally illegal. Go read the Treaty of Guadelupe Hidalgo sometime. Those south of the border are natives. Most of US citizens in the US are not and are descendants of illegal immigrant invaders.
 
The "race and gender preferences" since the Romans, have been white and male. And that is totally contradictory of a republic, where the law is supposed to instead favor Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion.

There is still way too much "punishment for criminals".
Legally you can only defend the inherent rights of individuals, so then laws like over drugs, sex, alcohol, etc. are inherently illegal in a republic. When you dictate without being necessary to defend others, that is not legal in a republic.

Borders are supposed to be "open".
This country was built on open borders and since we are almost all the descendants of illegal Euro immigrants, it is illegal to now try to close the borders, and even worse that those we deport are almost all descendants of natives who have a legal right to be here.

However I agree that Transgender had a decade of illegal hormones that should make it illegal for them to compete in women's sports.

The word "antisemitism" is all wrong. First of all, you have to capitalize it. Second is that the word Semitic comes from Shem, the fabled son of Noah who was to have fathered all Arabs, and it means "of Arab origins" not Jewish. Since the Hebrew were Arab, it can at most include Jews, but not be exclusive to them.

Wealth tax is the only fair way to do it.
It not only reflects the ability to pay, but those who gained the most from the government spending in the first place.

All societies do and should have a "cancel culture" over things unacceptable, like racism, abusing children, religious discrimination, etc. It is the wealthy elite who try to promote racist/fascism to excuse their obvious unfair bias.

The hallmark of civilization is state welfare.
Mohammed was one of the first to ask for donations for use to support widows and orphans.
But it should not be a function of just religion, since then other religions do not pay their fair share. So obviously welfare should be done by the state instead.

It is government who should be providing free health care, because all privatized insurance companies do is double the price by adding on layers of profits.

Sanctuary cites are inherent to law since the feds are only supposed to have jurisdiction over the borders that can't be locally controlled.
If a state or city wants more immigrants, the feds should have nothing to say about it.
All of the US is actually taken from others, and the treaties when we took it said we can't block things like immigration. ICE is totally illegal. Go read the Treaty of Guadelupe Hidalgo sometime. Those south of the border are natives. Most of US citizens in the US are not and are descendants of illegal immigrant invaders.
Get lost.
 
"....only rhetorical (political stagecraft)..."


I see....you aren't really stupid.......you're just a run-of-the mill liar.


None of these are simply meaningless terms....they are all impositions on a free country.


Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system



Clearly there is no similar list of Fascist agendas by the other party, only the Democrats.

Almost everything listed above has resulted from acts of traitors in government and year after year those things become increasingly entrenched in our country regardless of the party in power. How could that happen if there was genuine opposition between the parties?
 
Almost everything listed above has resulted from acts of traitors in government and year after year those things become increasingly entrenched in our country regardless of the party in power. How could that happen if there was genuine opposition between the parties?
We've been warned about it before, and it is the very reason I don't wish a one-party nation.


It is human nature.


AI Overview

The saying "power corrupts" suggests that holding a position of authority or influence tends to lead individuals to misuse their power, often for personal gain or benefit, and to act unethically. This idea implies that power can negatively impact a person's character and decision-making, potentially leading to abuse, corruption, and a disregard for the well-being of others.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Psychological Effects of Power:
  • Shifting Focus:
    Power can shift a person's focus from considering the needs and perspectives of others to prioritizing their own self-interest.

  • Reduced Empathy:
    Individuals in positions of power may experience a decline in empathy, making it harder to understand or care about the impact of their actions on others.

  • Increased Self-Importance:
    Power can foster a sense of entitlement and inflated self-importance, leading individuals to believe they are above the rules or consequences.

  • Impulsivity and Risk-Taking:
    Power can embolden individuals to take greater risks and act impulsively, as they may feel less accountable for their actions.

  • Dark Personality Traits:
    Some research suggests that power can exacerbate pre-existing tendencies towards narcissism, psychopathy, and other negative personality traits.
Historical and Societal Context:
  • The idea that power corrupts is not new. It has been observed throughout history, in various cultures and contexts.

  • Examples of abuse of power can be found in politics, business, and even within social groups.

  • The phrase "power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" is famously attributed to Lord Acton, a British historian and politician.
What Can Be Done?
 
Back
Top Bottom