FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

still not answering the question
do you or do you NOT support Goof-o-phera's concrete core hoax
 
FEMA misrepresented the core structure. The presence of butt plates joining sections of vertical stel shows that steel is not core column. the absense of diagonals and gussets proves that verticalsteel is not core columns.

panel_5.jpg
 
Mindlessly repeating the completely unpersausive canard that FEMA misrepresented anything is silly. That shit didn't work before. It doesn't improve with age.

The cores of the Twin Towers were constructed of steel. No concrete. No Invisicrete. Just steel. Floors were concrete, however.

CriscoFEARa remains an entirely dishonest and unconvincing FAIL.
 
Agents refuse to recognize evidence so it must be repeated IF the Constitution is to be supported and defended. FEMA lied.

The world really needed your text (not).
 
Agents refuse to recognize evidence so it must be repeated IF the Constitution is to be supported and defended. FEMA lied.

The world really needed your text (not).
A paranoid individual such as yourself is a poor source of reliable information. There is a valid reason people like you are locked up "for your own good".:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
Christopharter said:
So your cognitive distortions have more verification than what I post from globally published encyclopedias defining a concrete core in the Twins?

You post one quote from one book .. and the quote does not contain definitive evidence of a concrete core as you pupport.

There is no plural associated with one book and it is just one erroneous quote.. along with the multitudinous other bollocks you regurgitate so often ... adds up to one heap of steaming cow dung. :cuckoo:
 
Christopharter said:
So your cognitive distortions have more verification than what I post from globally published encyclopedias defining a concrete core in the Twins?

You post one quote from one book .. and the quote does not contain definitive evidence of a concrete core as you pupport.

There is no plural associated with one book and it is just one erroneous quote.. along with the multitudinous other bollocks you regurgitate so often ... adds up to one heap of steaming cow dung. :cuckoo:
and even what he quotes he has to distort to make it fit
 
Christophera said:
FEMA is not a constitutional entity.

Does it NEED to be ..?

We call this sort of organisation Civil Defence ... (those who manage emergency situations which endanger the general population .. such as natural disasters to name just one aspect)

In your USA case this is a Federal Authority presumably funded by the states and Federal funding.

What's your problem?

You have no proof that FEMA deceived the nation .. you are simply a delusional twit with a stupid theory.
 
Christophera said:
FEMA is not a constitutional entity.

Does it NEED to be ..?

We call this sort of organisation Civil Defence ... (those who manage emergency situations which endanger the general population .. such as natural disasters to name just one aspect)

In your USA case this is a Federal Authority presumably funded by the states and Federal funding.

What's your problem?

You have no proof that FEMA deceived the nation .. you are simply a delusional twit with a stupid theory.
and it seems none of the other troofers are willing to challenge him on it
 
Christophera said:
FEMA is not a constitutional entity.

Does it NEED to be ..?

We call this sort of organisation Civil Defence ... (those who manage emergency situations which endanger the general population .. such as natural disasters to name just one aspect)

In your USA case this is a Federal Authority presumably funded by the states and Federal funding.

What's your problem?

You have no proof that FEMA deceived the nation .. you are simply a delusional twit with a stupid theory.
and it seems none of the other troofers are willing to challenge him on it

...challenge what ?

You don't have to be a twoofer or a non twoofer to see what we are dealing with here .. he is a Christophera :ack-1: !!

:lol:
 
Does it NEED to be ..?

We call this sort of organisation Civil Defence ... (those who manage emergency situations which endanger the general population .. such as natural disasters to name just one aspect)

In your USA case this is a Federal Authority presumably funded by the states and Federal funding.

What's your problem?

You have no proof that FEMA deceived the nation .. you are simply a delusional twit with a stupid theory.
and it seems none of the other troofers are willing to challenge him on it

...challenge what ?

You don't have to be a twoofer or a non twoofer to see what we are dealing with here .. he is a Christophera :ack-1: !!

:lol:
i've asked all the other troofers posting here to comment on the concrete core hoax of his
and not one will
 
Meaning the truth movement is not using evidence, what's new? How big is the false social group?
must be about 6 billion
LOL

1,414 verified architectural and engineering professionals and 10,913 other supporters have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.


AE911Truth.org

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

1. Rapid onset of collapse

2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a second before the building's destruction

3.Symmetrical "structural failure" -- through the path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall acceleration

4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional

7. Fore-knowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:

8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples

9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses

10. Chemical signature of thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)

3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top