FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Rat in the Hat]

Typically rattie thinks that it is okay for law enforcement to violate laws and for courts to refuse to be accountable for keeping records.

However ratso cannot provide independently verified evidence for steel core columns such as what is found for the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYtE_eUeMw4&feature=related[/ame]

 

[Fizz]

Agents misrepresenting the structure. This image does not show the "inner core" it shows the crane platform in the core.

liar. its the inner core and the cranes.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

I'm hoping that unexplained rocket launch in LA was Goof-0-phera returning to his home planet.

 

[Christophera]

Agents misrepresenting the structure. This image does not show the "inner core" it shows the crane platform in the core.

liar. its the inner core and the cranes.

You mean core area and the crane platforms. If there were steel core columns they would be visible on 9-11 and they never are. Butt plates are seen and they are too weak to join "cor columns", meaning that ther vertical steel in the core is elevator guide rail support steel.

Here is the concrete core of WTC 2 on 9-11.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Dammit, he's still here re-posting the same debunked drivel.

Maybe yesterday was Citizen Pat, and Goof-0's scheduled for the next launch.

One can hope.

 

[Christophera]

Hmmmm, rat posting text has no value . . . except to the infiltrators of the US government.

The core of the Twins was a concrete tube. No no one has ever explained, reasonably, what it is if not concrete.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/southcorestands.gif

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Another blood money link. What a surprise.

Next it will be the FEMA drawing.

How predictable.

 

[Christophera]

No money made from that link. It costs to keep the truth visible.

However, in making your error, you failed, once again, to explain what this is if not concrete, agent.

 

[DiveCon]

nothing you post is the truth

 

[Christophera]

I post the .pdf of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. who describes a concrete core. Is that a lie?

 

[DiveCon]

I post the .pdf of August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. who describes a concrete core. Is that a lie?

your take on it is a lie

he is merely WRONG
and you lie by trying to make that something it isnt

 

[Christophera]

You are calling the structural engineer who is certified in 12 states wrong about his structural description of a building that supposedly collapse killing 3,000 people. He made that as a safety report for FEMA in clean up BEFORE guiliani too the WTC documents from the NYC department of buildings.

You are calling the Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 wrong? You are a joke. Oops. No, you are an agent and that behavior is typical.

 

[DiveCon]

yes, he was WRONG
and your take on what the oxford piece actually says its WRONG

 

[Obamerican]

You are calling the structural engineer who is certified in 12 states wrong about his structural description of a building that supposedly collapse killing 3,000 people. He made that as a safety report for FEMA in clean up BEFORE guiliani too the WTC documents from the NYC department of buildings.

You are calling the Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 wrong? You are a joke. Oops. No, you are an agent and that behavior is typical.

Which building killed 3,000 people? I thought there were TWO buildings?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

You are calling the structural engineer who is certified in 12 states wrong about his structural description of a building that supposedly collapse killing 3,000 people. He made that as a safety report for FEMA in clean up BEFORE guiliani too the WTC documents from the NYC department of buildings.

You are calling the Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 wrong? You are a joke. Oops. No, you are an agent and that behavior is typical.

Which building killed 3,000 people? I thought there were TWO buildings?

And 4 planes. And the Pentagon.

Goof-0 conveniently leaves those out of the equation.

 

[Christophera]

Oh, people were killed by planes, but guiliani did not steal the plans for those. What he stole the plans for killed the major part of 3,000. the cause of death on 3,000 death certificates is invalid.

 

[Fizz]

the cause of death on 3,000 death certificates is invalid.

proof please. show what is listed as the cause of death on the death certificates. (and your source, of course).

 

[Christophera]

I don't need that proof you ask for, you do not need it either. Asking is subterfude provening you are an agent. You must accept the proof available and infer. Search the NIST product and find a statement about the plans. You will find none except that they were destroyed in the towers on 9-11. Then reda the disclaimer.

NIST did not have the plans. It is impossible to conduct forensic engineering analysis of high performance skycrapers without plans. Logically the cause of death cannot be correct. We do not need the death certificates.

 

[Christophera]

The ex mayor stole the plans in violations of law of law, but you refuse to notice that.

The plans the public has come from silverstein and are obsolete and faked to appear as final drawings by the digital addition of revision tables to the scanned blue prints.

Those things, not characters of the alphabet have been sized and positioned in the table. NOT artifacts from scanning which are random.

 

[DiveCon]

more goof-o-phera lies