Rat in the Hat
Gold Member
- Mar 31, 2010
- 21,949
- 6,021
- 198
Since you cannot show this core on 9-11.
![]()
And again, Goof-0 does not fail to meet my expectations.



Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since you cannot show this core on 9-11.
![]()
Goof-O-Phera is a "special" caseCan somebody explain to me the relevance of this thread. The elephant in the room is that billions of people witnessed planes laden with jet fuel smash into buildings which acted as the catalyst for bringing them down. These conspiracy theorists are complete nut-jobs.
you are a pathetic LIARThen there are no steel columns in the upper left and none lower to the right. Concrete can look like that, but not steel columns.
the voices in his headsays who? source please.Then there are no steel columns in the upper left and none lower to the right. Concrete can look like that, but not steel columns.![]()
says who? source please.Then there are no steel columns in the upper left and none lower to the right. Concrete can look like that, but not steel columns.![]()
Then there are no steel columns in the upper left and none lower to the right. Concrete can look like that, but not steel columns.
There is a mass of Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
Since there are no projecting columns from the core seen below, there were no columns.
![]()
YOU are the only "agent of treason" hereComing from a lying manipulating agent of treason, with no evidence, that is behavior which consists of evidence. If you wish to confess to concealing felony and treason, misprision, you should post in the other thread.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...n-of-treason-filed-in-district-court-272.html
Coming from a lying manipulating agent of treason, with no evidence, that is behavior which consists of evidence. If you wish to confess to concealing felony and treason, misprision, you should post in the other thread.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...n-of-treason-filed-in-district-court-272.html
Coming from a lying manipulating agent of treason, with no evidence, that is behavior which consists of evidence. If you wish to confess to concealing felony and treason, misprision, you should post in the other thread.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...n-of-treason-filed-in-district-court-272.html
YOU are one spamming motherfucker for posting the SAME SHIT over and over. STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Since there are no projecting columns from the core seen below, there were no columns.
![]()