Because I don't need to purchase a set of the official copyrighted blueprints. I believe Mr. Robertson, not a goofball like you.
Because they grounded all of the news helicopters, who would have been able to get video from above that would have shown the structure of the buildings as they fell. All the video from the ground was obscured by the dust and smoke.
Wrong, here is a pic showing an empty core with a massive concrete wall toppling into it.
And now, some questions for you, Goof-0-phera,
Why don't you use your algoxy blood money to purchase a set of the official blueprints and prove us wrong, if you're so damned sure of your theory?
WHY?
There are no official plans to be had, whatsoever. If that were not true then all the "quasi leaders of 9-11" would have made them available.
agents pretending they are stupid really doesn't work.
Why can't you produce one image of an intact concrete core during any time period the twins were intact and occupied?
WHY?
Duh, why can't you recognize
violations of law that deprive the public of 6,000 photo files?
Why are you the only member of this message board who claims there was a concrete core? Why doesn't anyone else stand up for you and your theory?
WHY?
Why don't you answer these simple questions, Goof-0-phera?
We're still waiting for these answers.
Either there are no real truth seekers here or they are completely controlled by social fears, dependent on quasi leaders or are clueless as to structural steel and concrete.
Similar to agents attempting to assert that this is gypsum fastened to steel core columns.
That is a concrete tube. The inner tube of the "tube in a tube" construction.