One can't have a home built without structural details. A new building 105 stories high, new to its development at the time required city, state, federal and military clearances. Where are all of these agencies stamped approved plans? Congress should INSIST that these drawings be made a part of the OFFICIAL RECORD.
Citizen Pat.
I have some questions that I would appreciate you answering for me regarding Chris' evidence of a rectangular, concrete core. A concrete core with long walls of 12' thick concrete and short walls of 17' thick concrete at it's base. Chris says that the concrete core walls of WTC1 were BETWEEN the first row of core column and the first inner row of columns. That means that there was 12' of concrete between the lobby and the 12 express elevators (11 on the opposite side). Chris INSISTS that ALL elevators at the lobby level were accessed form within the concrete core and that there was no access to ANY elevators OUTSIDE the core at the lobby level.
Now read the next part closely. Chris used to believe that there was NO ACCESS to ANY elevators outside the core at the lobby level IN EITHER TOWER. Do you understand what I am saying? Let's say that again. Based on everything Chris saw and read, he ALWAYS BELIEVED THERE WAS NO ACCESS TO ANY ELEVATORS AT THE LOBBY LEVEL FROM OUTSIDE THE CORE IN EITHER WTC1 OR WTC2.
That is until I proved him wrong. To which HE ADMITTED, in a thread on another forum, he was wrong and that I finally proved access to elevators from outside the core, at the lobby level.
Then his story changed to fit this new evidence I provided. He then started saying that the towers were radically different in design and THAT WTC2 had access to elevators outside the core, but WTC1 did not.
WHAT?
Where did he get this new information all of a sudden that the towers were radically different? Why did he first believe that both towers had no access to ANY elevators outside the core? Was the supposed documentary wrong about them at first? Why the new information from Chris about WTC2 being designed like Cape Canaveral? Why did he start to say this AFTER he admitted to being wrong about the elevator access?
He still holds fast to the fact that there was no access to ANY elevators from outsdie the core at the lobby level.
Want to know a secret? I KNOW people that worked in both towers. I have spoken to them personally. One of whom I work with now. Every one of them said that WTC1 was like WTC2. They ALL said that there was access to the express elevators FROM OUTSIDE the core at the lobby in WTC1.
I can sit here and tell you this all day, but here's the kicker. Go find someone yourself that worked there and ask them what the access was like. you'll get the same answer that I have. I don't need to tell lies and make stuff up because it's the truth. This simple exercise of asking people who worked there will PROVE to you Chris is wrong about everything.
Why do you think he is fighting so hard to maintain the fact the WTC1 was different than WTC2? Because if he admits WTC1 had elevator access from outside the core, that means there could not have been a 12' thick concrete wall between the lobby area and the express elevators!
Why do you think he won't produce a scaled drawing of the lobby to show how all 48 elevators, a 16' wide hallway running the length of the core, and three stairwells, fit inside?
Because he can't! It's all made up as he goes along. He changes his story and shapes it as people present evidence against it. I can show you his past websites and threads to show how his story evolved over time.
The big question. Why do the hard facts of his theory keep changing if his evidence is from a video from way back? Did they change it or something? I've been debating Chris for years and my story never changes, why does his? Why won't he ask people who worked in the towers about what the lobby layout was like in WTC1? All these excuses to NOT get this information or answer the tough questions, yet he can accuse people of murder using blurry pictures and a mistake laden theory...
And you believe him...
That's what's sad.
