Also I know you might not care, but I am currently going through a lot and I don't deserve this treatment from you. I can forgive your anger, but it shouldn't be directed at me, I've never attacked you.
and he can also be found not responsible, so I can and will accept any outcome, kinda childish to harp onn that when neither of us especially you have no control of it,,,,
I agree with you. What should have happened was that there should have a been a well-trained, organized body of men in Kenosha who would defend the businesses that AntiFa etc were trying to destroy -- (not with guns). And when Kyle showed up, he should have been folded into that organization, in some position suitable for a 17 year old, and his weapon secured and returned to him when he went home. He should never have become isolated amidst the AntiFa vermin.
And he brought a rifle to a protest after video showing him wanting to shoot shoplifters. Criminal is not civil.
Yep. What's your point.
thats something .people keep ignoring,, kyle shouldnt have been put in a position he was because the adult men of that community should have been there doing their duty,,
That the jury will decide if that's sufficient.
Which is why when a 17 makes a poorly thought of decision, it is some of societies fault. It takes a village to raise a child, he was not prepared for that at all. who of us would be?
based on the outcome he must have thought it out and was well prepared and walked away with his life after 4 men tried to kill him,,,
They've got video of those men chasing, Rittenhouse and attacking him as he tried to escape them. That isn't murder, Mike. That's classic self defense. They can bring a civil suit but it won't change the verdict in the criminal trial and won't make Rittenhouse any more guilty.
Why would he also bring a fire extinguisher to the riot if he was there to shoot shoplifters? Was he shooting at rioters before he was attacked? The answer to that is no...he was using his fire extinguisher to put out fires that the rioters had set. Him doing THAT is what made the mob attack him! Good luck trying to win THAT case, I don't care if it's criminal or civil!
Actually, when you read about him, his personal history, he's nearly a model citizen ... even just a bit of a goody-goody. Bringing his AR15 to a riot was an error of judgement. But that reflects the immaturity of the patriot movement at the moment.
That will be his argument. Let's see how it pans out.
how does it reflect against the patriot movement?? if nothing it shows how more important it is,, due to a young man stepping up and doing what men should be doing,, let alone the politicians that allowed and even encouraged it,,
The last sentence might be as accurate as any. You need strong, responsible leaders. Sadly in Canada they are lacking. Men who firmly believe in civil liberties, accountability, transparency while also Rule of Law and will defend it against mob rule
kyle was using his civil liberties to defend rule of law against the mob,,
To attempt to defend the likes of Rittenhouse is to attempt to defend the indefensible – such is the reprehensible right.
a strong responsible leader would have never allowed the riot to take place,,, thats democrats for you,,
your premise is a lie,, a jury ruled he did legally defend himself,,
