Fear of debt default to fuel obama recession

Part of this are also some fairly clear indications that QE/Infinity has underperformed and the effects of the global commodities collapse.

Perfect storm. Good, we've been badly overdue for a good ol' correction for a long time, let's do this and get it over with.
.

ZIRP and QE are massive failures that have only prolonged the inevitable.
 
This has nothing to do with Obama.


and neither did the stock market highs right??
that doesn't follow. a better economy means a higher stock market. so perhaps he's not responsible for the entirety, but his policies have played a part in the increase.


no it doesnt mean that leftard. it USED TO FOLLOW that a high stock market meant a healthy economy. that hasnt been the case for some time now. that's why poverty reached a FIFTY YEAR HIGH on obama's watch, and income inequality grew. how have "his policies played a part in the increase"???
 
The OP's point is accurate and proven here.

Market rises and it is Obama's victory, due to shrewd policy. If it falls they blame everyone and anyone else, just like posters did here.


The markets are falling because of china's unregulated and screwed up economic structure. Of course, you blame Obama because you want to cut everything.
China's economy is unregulated?
See, the problem is you are so completely misinformed you say the stupidest stuff. You might be worse than Billy Triple Fail, who thinks people become billionaires by stuffing their money into sofa cushions.
China is a state run communist country with a free market component. A component they have screwed up royally btw.
 
This has nothing to do with Obama.


and neither did the stock market highs right??
that doesn't follow. a better economy means a higher stock market. so perhaps he's not responsible for the entirety, but his policies have played a part in the increase.


no it doesnt mean that leftard. it USED TO FOLLOW that a high stock market meant a healthy economy. that hasnt been the case for some time now. that's why poverty reached a FIFTY YEAR HIGH on obama's watch, and income inequality grew. how have "his policies played a part in the increase"???
so you're going to argue that the economy is in worse shape than it was when the president took office?
 
Part of this are also some fairly clear indications that QE/Infinity has underperformed and the effects of the global commodities collapse.

Perfect storm. Good, we've been badly overdue for a good ol' correction for a long time, let's do this and get it over with.
.
The best news is the gov't is constrained on what they can do. No more "cash for clunkers", no more zero interest rates as we're there already.
So with any luck when the recession hits we will do nothing. Well not nothing. Maybe we can cut some of the enormous taxes and onerous regulatons Obama has imposed. Then we can see what 6% growth out of a recession looks like.
 
This has nothing to do with Obama.


and neither did the stock market highs right??
that doesn't follow. a better economy means a higher stock market. so perhaps he's not responsible for the entirety, but his policies have played a part in the increase.


no it doesnt mean that leftard. it USED TO FOLLOW that a high stock market meant a healthy economy. that hasnt been the case for some time now. that's why poverty reached a FIFTY YEAR HIGH on obama's watch, and income inequality grew. how have "his policies played a part in the increase"???
so you're going to argue that the economy is in worse shape than it was when the president took office?

in some ways yes of course it is; and according to things the Left holds near and dear no less.

so you're goinng to answer a question with a question? and you're saying the economy is better since obama has been in office why again?
 
This has nothing to do with Obama.


and neither did the stock market highs right??
that doesn't follow. a better economy means a higher stock market. so perhaps he's not responsible for the entirety, but his policies have played a part in the increase.


no it doesnt mean that leftard. it USED TO FOLLOW that a high stock market meant a healthy economy. that hasnt been the case for some time now. that's why poverty reached a FIFTY YEAR HIGH on obama's watch, and income inequality grew. how have "his policies played a part in the increase"???
so you're going to argue that the economy is in worse shape than it was when the president took office?


1. when obama took office was a period, a time frame. it isnt indicative of the whole previous President's time in office. Straw man

2. 13 million more are on food stamps in obama's SEVENTH YEAR, then were under Bush
3. the very richest got richer under obama, the poorest got poorer; both at a FASTER PACE than was happening under bush
 
This has nothing to do with Obama.


and neither did the stock market highs right??
that doesn't follow. a better economy means a higher stock market. so perhaps he's not responsible for the entirety, but his policies have played a part in the increase.


no it doesnt mean that leftard. it USED TO FOLLOW that a high stock market meant a healthy economy. that hasnt been the case for some time now. that's why poverty reached a FIFTY YEAR HIGH on obama's watch, and income inequality grew. how have "his policies played a part in the increase"???
so you're going to argue that the economy is in worse shape than it was when the president took office?


1. when obama took office was a period, a time frame. it isnt indicative of the whole previous President's time in office. Straw man

2. 13 million more are on food stamps in obama's SEVENTH YEAR, then were under Bush
3. the very richest got richer under obama, the poorest got poorer; both at a FASTER PACE than was happening under bush
employment is better, savings are up...

honestly, you feel like the economy is in worse shape now than it was in 2008?
 
I knew, with absolute 100 percent certainty, when I heard about the world's stock markets falling, that the rubes on this forum would find a way to blame Obama.

Somehow.
^ that

BTW- its prolly a market correction as the Chinese are corrupt as we are. Almost.
 
and neither did the stock market highs right??
that doesn't follow. a better economy means a higher stock market. so perhaps he's not responsible for the entirety, but his policies have played a part in the increase.


no it doesnt mean that leftard. it USED TO FOLLOW that a high stock market meant a healthy economy. that hasnt been the case for some time now. that's why poverty reached a FIFTY YEAR HIGH on obama's watch, and income inequality grew. how have "his policies played a part in the increase"???
so you're going to argue that the economy is in worse shape than it was when the president took office?


1. when obama took office was a period, a time frame. it isnt indicative of the whole previous President's time in office. Straw man

2. 13 million more are on food stamps in obama's SEVENTH YEAR, then were under Bush
3. the very richest got richer under obama, the poorest got poorer; both at a FASTER PACE than was happening under bush
employment is better, savings are up...

honestly, you feel like the economy is in worse shape now than it was in 2008?


2008 was a snapshot. i already told you this is a straw man

try again
 
I knew, with absolute 100 percent certainty, when I heard about the world's stock markets falling, that the rubes on this forum would find a way to blame Obama.

Somehow.
^ that

BTW- its prolly a market correction as the Chinese are corrupt as we are. Almost.


but you gave him credit for the highs right................rube?
 
the stock market, specifically the DOW is a collection of the richest of those mean ol corporations you losers vowed to shut down and OCCUPY.
now if you want to give credit to obama for their RECORD PROFITS under obama; while the poorest got poorer; why are other people hypocrites for pointing out you reject credit for the lows?

you just want to brag he's responsible for the highs?

and others are "rubes" for pointing out your hypocrisy?'
really?

lol
 
that doesn't follow. a better economy means a higher stock market. so perhaps he's not responsible for the entirety, but his policies have played a part in the increase.


no it doesnt mean that leftard. it USED TO FOLLOW that a high stock market meant a healthy economy. that hasnt been the case for some time now. that's why poverty reached a FIFTY YEAR HIGH on obama's watch, and income inequality grew. how have "his policies played a part in the increase"???
so you're going to argue that the economy is in worse shape than it was when the president took office?


1. when obama took office was a period, a time frame. it isnt indicative of the whole previous President's time in office. Straw man

2. 13 million more are on food stamps in obama's SEVENTH YEAR, then were under Bush
3. the very richest got richer under obama, the poorest got poorer; both at a FASTER PACE than was happening under bush
employment is better, savings are up...

honestly, you feel like the economy is in worse shape now than it was in 2008?


2008 was a snapshot. i already told you this is a straw man

try again
2008 was the culmination of years of republican policies. it was not a snapshot, it was the photo finish.
 

Forum List

Back
Top