Contacting a witness and getting her to change her testimony is witness tamperingExplain how that constitutes witness tampering.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Contacting a witness and getting her to change her testimony is witness tamperingExplain how that constitutes witness tampering.
He’s shitting me by taking a quote from her own book???That's the crime here???? Provide a list of lawyers that would accept a payment plan. Loudermilk is shitting you.
By telling you some crime was committed that needs investigation.He’s shitting me by taking a quote from her own book???
he's just laying out the facts of what happened.By telling you some crime was committed that needs investigation.
please cite evidence where this is witness tampering in a hearing.Contacting a witness and getting her to change her testimony is witness tampering
The report said the witness contacted Cheney because the witness wanted to change her testimony.Contacting a witness and getting her to change her testimony is witness tampering
So it's against the law to provide a list of lawyers that accepts a payment plan? Seriously dude?he's just laying out the facts of what happened.
the law is the law, the facts broke that law
The report said the witness contacted Cheney because the witness wanted to change her testimony.
no it's against the law to contact a known represented witness and tamper with them.So it's against the law to provide a list of lawyers that accepts a payment plan? Seriously dude?
What's the tampering part?no it's against the law to contact a known represented witness and tamper with them.
Nothing in that post says that it was Cheney who initiated contact.actually that is not what the report says., It says that Liz Cheney had a third party, Ms. Griffen, reach out first
Alyssa Farah Griffin Backchanneled with Vice Chair Liz Cheney to Help Hutchinson Change her Story For nearly a month, Farah Griffin acted as an intermediary between Vice Chair Cheney and the Select Committee’s star witness, Hutchinson. As an intermediary, Farah Griffin helped coordinate Hutchinson’s third transcribed interview—without the knowledge of Hutchinson’s attorney, Stefan Passantino.75 In a television panel with a member of the Select Committee— Representative Raskin—a year following the end of the Select Committee, Hutchinson freely stated that she had “backchanneled for a third interview without my former attorney’s knowledge at the time, with one of my good friends, Alyssa Farah Griffin.”76 At this time, Farah Griffin and Hutchinson discussed the optics of Hutchinson leaking “new information” to the press instead of testifying directly to the Select Committee.77 Hutchinson’s messages indicate that she and Farah Griffin colluded to create a false story about why Hutchinson needed to do a third transcribed interview for the Select Committee to convince her attorney, Passantino
In her May 17, 2021, transcribed interview, Hutchinson testified to a series of uncorroborated and unverified stories that conveniently fit the Select Committee’s anti-Trump narrative. Despite already testifying to the Select Committee twice, Hutchinson never previously mentioned this “new information.”
The Subcommittee was only able to obtain a limited number of text messages from Hutchinson and Farah Griffin, but Representative Cheney’s influence on Hutchinson is apparent from that point forward by her dramatic change in testimony and eventual claims against President Trump using second- and thirdhand accounts. For example, Hutchinson claimed that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato (“Ornato”) told her that Trump lunged towards the driver of his car after Trump’s request to go to the Capitol was denied. This story has never been corroborated and was directly refuted by both United States Secret Service (“USSS”) agents in the vehicle with President Trump that day, and Ornato himself.
when she got the witness to change her testimony and lie under oathWhat's the tampering part?
other then when it highlights that Liz had Griffin bankchannel with the witnessNothing in that post says that it was Cheney who initiated contact.
Bullshit. If that were the case they would come after Hutchinson. But they ain't.when she got the witness to change her testimony and lie under oath
why would Congress go after her? She was the witness, not the member of Congress that tampered with her testimony.Bullshit. If that were the case they would come after Hutchinson. But they ain't.
Griffin was the backchannel, but it doesn't say Cheney initiated contact.other then when it highlights that Liz had Griffin bankchannel with the witness
Did Cheney threaten Hutchinson to change her testimony?when she got the witness to change her testimony and lie under oath
Griffin was the backchannel, but it doesn't say Cheney initiated contact.
But it's still not witness tampering.