FBI should probe 'potential' Liz Cheney 'witness tampering' in Jan 6 matter

[struth]

Did Cheney threaten Hutchinson to change her testimony?

not sure yet....we will find out at her trial.

 

[struth]

Hutchinson's Attorney:
“Ms. Hutchinson made the independent decision to part ways with her Trump-funded lawyer, freeing her to provide candid, truthful, and honorable testimony to the January 6th Committee about the attack on the Capitol, alongside dozens of Republican witnesses and law enforcement officers,” he said. “Despite baseless attacks by men with their own agendas to discredit her, Ms. Hutchinson stands by her testimony and remains committed to the truth and accountability.”

Odd, the SS says she lied. I take the word of the honorable agents that were there that day

Not the Liz Cheney hand picked lawyer for the witness she tampered with to change her testimony.

 

[Marener]

Correct Liz had Griffin act as a bankchannel before directly interacting with the witness, and getting her to change her testimony.

Yes, getting a witness to change their testimony is tampering.

Odd that you think that's ok

The text messages between Hutchinson and Farah indicate it was Hutchinson who asked Farah to reach out to Cheney.

 

[Marener]

not sure yet....we will find out at her trial.

So you have no evidence for witness tampering. Gotcha.

 

[struth]

View attachment 1055248

The text messages between Hutchinson and Farah indicate it was Hutchinson who asked Farah to reach out to Cheney.

correct, that messaage....where she was working the backchannel to change her testimony.

why do you think that helps your case? hahah weird

 

[struth]

So you have no evidence for witness tampering. Gotcha.

hahaha the report shows massive amounts of evidence, hence the criminal referral

 

[Marener]

correct, that messaage....where she was working the backchannel to change her testimony.

That message was from Hutchinson, not Cheney. It indicates Hutchinson asked Farrah to reach out to Cheney.

 

[Marener]

hahaha the report shows massive amounts of evidence, hence the criminal referral

If there’s so much evidence, why don’t you know if she intimidated her?

 

[struth]

That message was from Hutchinson, not Cheney. It indicates Hutchinson asked Farrah to reach out to Cheney.

Yes the message was between Farrah and Hutchinson

Liz’s backchannel, conspiring to change her testimony

 

[struth]

If there’s so much evidence, why don’t you know if she intimidated her?

Save your arguements for the jury

 

[blackhawk]

She trashed her career destroyed any credibility she ever had and is now irrelevant just let her fade into obscurity that would be the worst thing that could be done to her.

 

[Godboy]

The topic is Liz Cheney.

This supposed report claims to have evidence that she violated the law, but it's not explained clearly what evidence or how she broke the law.

Dude, go read a fucking article on it, and dont pick a leftwing source. They wont EVER tell you the other sides arguments and positions.

 

[Marener]

Dude, go read a fucking article on it, and dont pick a leftwing source. They wont EVER tell you the other sides arguments and positions.

I read the report. It doesn't have evidence of a crime.

 

[Marener]

Save your arguements for the jury

There won't be a jury unless you have evidence of a crime.

Since you admit there's no evidence she intimidated her, then you don't have a crime.

 

[Marener]

Yes the message was between Farrah and Hutchinson

And in that message, it indicates that Hutchinson asked Farah to reach out to Liz, which is the opposite of what you are trying to claim.

 

[struth]

There won't be a jury unless you have evidence of a crime.

Since you admit there's no evidence she intimidated her, then you don't have a crime.

I do. It’s in the report. You literally provided a text message the backchannel witness tampering

 

[struth]

And in that message, it indicates that Hutchinson asked Farah to reach out to Liz, which is the opposite of what you are trying to claim.

Yes in that moment. Farrah clearly was already talking to her

But regardless, it doesn’t matter who reached out to who first, what matters is Liz tampered with the witness and got her to change her testimony

 

[Marener]

I do. It’s in the report. You literally provided a text message the backchannel witness tampering

Post the text where it shows Cheney intimidated her.

 

[struth]

Post the text where it shows Cheney intimidated her.

When did i say I had one?!? What a weird post

 

[Marener]

Yes in that moment. Farrah clearly was already talking to her

But regardless, it doesn’t matter who reached out to who first, what matters is Liz tampered with the witness and got her to change her testimony

There's no evidence of witness tampering in that text message.

There is evidence that Hutchinson reached out to the committee because she wanted to be more forthcoming with her testimony.